Suppr超能文献

科学教育:内容过多但涉猎过浅。

Science education: too much of too little.

作者信息

Malvin R L

机构信息

Department of Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-0622.

出版信息

Am J Physiol. 1990 Jun;258(6 Pt 3):S3-7. doi: 10.1152/advances.1990.258.6.S3.

Abstract

By all measures attempted, scientific literacy of the American public is sadly wanting. The vast majority of our secondary school children and adults have no knowledge of most of the basic terms or concepts of science. The reasons for this shortcoming are many but prominent among them are sadly deficient texts, teachers untrained in the subject matter they teach, and college and university scientists who divorce themselves from the problem, although probably deploring it. Our institutions are no aid. They reward scientific productivity (read: number of papers published per year and research dollars), not teaching. Some suggested cures are production of better texts, training of science teachers in the field in which they teach, and, most importantly, involvement of scientists in the process. We must be willing to spend some of our time with secondary school pupils and their teachers. All will gain from the experience.

摘要

从所有尝试的衡量标准来看,美国公众的科学素养令人遗憾地欠缺。我们绝大多数的中学生和成年人对大多数科学基本术语或概念一无所知。造成这一缺陷的原因有很多,但其中突出的原因是教材严重不足、教师在所教科目方面未经培训,以及大学科学家虽可能对此感到遗憾但却置身于这个问题之外。我们的教育机构也没有起到帮助作用。它们奖励科研成果(即:每年发表的论文数量和研究经费),而不是教学。一些建议的解决办法包括编写更好的教材、对科学教师进行他们所教领域的培训,以及最重要的是,让科学家参与到这个过程中来。我们必须愿意花一些时间与中学生及其教师在一起。所有人都将从这种经历中受益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验