Padian Kevin, Matzke Nicholas
Department of Integrative Biology and Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3140, USA.
Biochem J. 2009 Jan 1;417(1):29-42. doi: 10.1042/BJ20081534.
ID ('intelligent design') is not science, but a form of creationism; both are very different from the simple theological proposition that a divine Creator is responsible for the natural patterns and processes of the Universe. Its current version maintains that a 'Designer' must intervene miraculously to accomplish certain natural scientific events. The verdict in the 2005 case Kitzmiller, et al. v. Dover School District, et al. (in Harrisburg, PA, U.S.A.) was a landmark of American jurisprudence that prohibited the teaching of ID as science, identified it as religiously based, and forbade long-refuted 'criticisms of evolution' from introduction into public school classes. Much of the science of the trial was based on biochemistry; biochemists and other scientists have several important opportunities to improve scientific literacy and science education in American public schools ('state schools') by working with teachers, curriculum developers and textbook writers.
“智能设计论”并非科学,而是神创论的一种形式;这两者与“神圣造物者对宇宙的自然模式和过程负责”这一简单神学命题截然不同。其当前版本坚称,“设计者”必须进行奇迹干预才能促成某些自然科学事件。2005年基茨米勒等人诉多佛学区等人一案(在美国宾夕法尼亚州哈里斯堡)的裁决是美国法学的一个里程碑,该裁决禁止将“智能设计论”作为科学进行教学,认定其基于宗教,并禁止将长期遭到驳斥的“对进化论的批判”引入公立学校课堂。该审判中的许多科学内容都基于生物化学;生物化学家及其他科学家有几个重要机会,可通过与教师、课程开发者和教科书编写者合作,提高美国公立学校(“国立学校”)的科学素养和科学教育水平。