• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统腹腔镜与机器人辅助腹腔镜术后疼痛及恢复比较。

Postoperative pain and recovery after conventional laparoscopy compared with robotically assisted laparoscopy.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;121(3):547-553. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318280da64.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0b013e318280da64
PMID:23635617
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare postoperative pain after conventional laparoscopic and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecology.

METHODS

This is a prospective nonrandomized analysis of patients undergoing conventional laparoscopy or robotically assisted laparoscopy in a university-affiliated hospital between March 2011 and March 2012. Postoperative pain was measured using the Numeric Rating Scale and the narcotic use converted to morphine sulfate equivalents. The primary outcome was the Numeric Rating Scale pain score obtained on the first postoperative day.

RESULTS

One hundred ten patients were enrolled; 91 were included in the statistical analysis. Both groups were similar with regard to race, history of abdominopelvic surgeries, psychiatric history, and substance abuse. Patients undergoing robotically assisted laparoscopy were 6 years older and had a body mass index 6 points higher. Median length of hospital stay for conventional laparoscopy and robotically assisted laparoscopy was 2 days and 3 days, respectively (P<.001); median to being off narcotics was 4 days and 4.5 days, respectively (P=.336); and median return to normal activities was 13 days and 21 days, respectively (P=.021). There were no significant differences in mean Numeric Rating Scale pain scores over time (P=.499) or mean narcotic requirements (P=.393) between groups.

CONCLUSION

Robotically assisted laparoscopy is equivalent to conventional laparoscopy in terms of subjective and objective measures of postoperative pain.

摘要

目的

比较妇科常规腹腔镜手术和机器人辅助腹腔镜手术后的术后疼痛。

方法

这是 2011 年 3 月至 2012 年 3 月期间在一所大学附属医院接受常规腹腔镜或机器人辅助腹腔镜手术的患者的前瞻性非随机分析。使用数字评分量表测量术后疼痛,并将麻醉药物用量转换为硫酸吗啡当量。主要结局是术后第 1 天的数字评分量表疼痛评分。

结果

共纳入 110 例患者,其中 91 例纳入统计分析。两组在种族、腹部盆腔手术史、精神病史和药物滥用方面相似。接受机器人辅助腹腔镜手术的患者年龄大 6 岁,体重指数高 6 分。常规腹腔镜和机器人辅助腹腔镜的中位住院时间分别为 2 天和 3 天(P<.001);中位停用麻醉药物的时间分别为 4 天和 4.5 天(P=.336);中位恢复正常活动的时间分别为 13 天和 21 天(P=.021)。两组之间的数字评分量表疼痛评分的平均值(P=.499)或麻醉药物需求量的平均值(P=.393)在时间上均无显著差异。

结论

机器人辅助腹腔镜手术在术后疼痛的主观和客观测量方面与常规腹腔镜手术相当。

相似文献

1
Postoperative pain and recovery after conventional laparoscopy compared with robotically assisted laparoscopy.传统腹腔镜与机器人辅助腹腔镜术后疼痛及恢复比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;121(3):547-553. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318280da64.
2
Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.接受计算机辅助(“机器人”)和标准腹腔镜手术治疗新发子宫内膜癌患者的术后疼痛药物需求。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(11):3561-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3064-9.
3
Liposomal bupivacaine efficacy for postoperative pain following posterior vaginal surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.脂质体布比卡因用于阴道后壁手术后的术后疼痛:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):500.e1-500.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.029. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
4
A cost analysis of postoperative management in endometrial cancer patients treated by robotics versus laparoscopic approach.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜癌患者术后管理的成本分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Dec;123(3):528-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.08.021. Epub 2011 Oct 2.
5
Transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain relief after hand-assisted laparoscopic colon surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.腹横肌平面阻滞用于手辅助腹腔镜结肠手术后的术后疼痛缓解:一项随机、安慰剂对照临床试验
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Dec;20(12):835-844. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1550-3. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
6
Systemic lidocaine to improve postoperative quality of recovery after ambulatory laparoscopic surgery.全身应用利多卡因以改善日间腹腔镜手术后的恢复质量。
Anesth Analg. 2012 Aug;115(2):262-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318257a380. Epub 2012 May 14.
7
Perioperative pain after robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection.机器人辅助与腹腔镜直肠切除术后的围手术期疼痛
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Mar;33(3):285-289. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2943-0. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
8
Liposome Bupivacaine for Postsurgical Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Robotically Assisted Cardiac Surgery.脂质体布比卡因用于机器人辅助心脏手术患者术后镇痛
Innovations (Phila). 2015 Nov-Dec;10(6):416-9. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000190.
9
Impact of single-incision laparoscopic surgery on postoperative analgesia requirements after total colectomy for ulcerative colitis: a propensity-matched comparison with multiport laparoscopy.单切口腹腔镜手术对溃疡性结肠炎全结肠切除术后镇痛需求的影响:与多孔腹腔镜的倾向评分匹配比较。
Colorectal Dis. 2019 Aug;21(8):953-960. doi: 10.1111/codi.14668. Epub 2019 May 20.
10
Transversus abdominis plane block versus perioperative intravenous lidocaine versus patient-controlled intravenous morphine for postoperative pain control after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: study protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial.腹腔镜结直肠手术后腹横肌平面阻滞与围手术期静脉注射利多卡因及患者自控静脉注射吗啡用于术后疼痛控制的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲对照临床试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Dec 4;15:476. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-476.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Post-Operative Pain Outcomes in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery With and Without a Hysterectomy.比较有子宫切除术和无子宫切除术的盆腔器官脱垂手术的术后疼痛结果。
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 May 10. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06162-6.
2
Robotic and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after learning curve: 30-day and 12-month outcomes.学习曲线后机器人和腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术:30 天和 12 个月的结果。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Dec;16(6):1257-1263. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01384-y. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
3
Long-term satisfaction of patients after laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy.
腹腔镜和机器人辅助子宫切除术患者的长期满意度。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Jun;305(6):1481-1490. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06360-9. Epub 2021 Dec 26.
4
Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Large Uterus.大型子宫机器人辅助与腹腔镜子宫切除术的比较
JSLS. 2019 Jan-Mar;23(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00068.
5
Use of Paracervical Block Before Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy.腹腔镜次全子宫切除术前行宫颈旁阻滞的应用
JSLS. 2018 Jul-Sep;22(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00023.
6
Comparison of postoperative pain between laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomies for renal tumors: A propensity score matching analysis.腹腔镜与机器人辅助肾部分切除术治疗肾肿瘤术后疼痛的比较:倾向评分匹配分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jul;96(29):e7581. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007581.
7
Analysis of postoperative pain in robotic versus traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术术后疼痛分析
J Robot Surg. 2014 Mar;8(1):35-41. doi: 10.1007/s11701-013-0418-z. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
8
Robotic surgery: disruptive innovation or unfulfilled promise? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the first 30 years.机器人手术:颠覆性创新还是未兑现的承诺?对前30年的系统评价和荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4330-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4752-x. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
9
Improvement in quality of life after robotic surgery results in patient satisfaction.机器人手术后生活质量的改善带来了患者满意度。
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Sep;138(3):727-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.07.013. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
10
Ultrasound-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane infiltration with liposomal bupivacaine for patients undergoing robotic-assisted hysterectomy: a retrospective study.超声引导下脂质体布比卡因肋下腹横肌平面浸润用于机器人辅助子宫切除术患者:一项回顾性研究
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Jun;25(5):937-41. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000429.