Division of Cell and Molecular Biology, Department of Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mol Cancer Ther. 2013 May;12(5):787-98. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-1240. Epub 2013 May 1.
Drugs that target the tumor vasculature and inhibit angiogenesis are widely used for cancer treatment. Individual tumors show large differences in vascularity, but it is uncertain how these differences affect responsiveness to antiangiogenesis. We investigated this question using two closely related prostate cancer models that differ markedly in tumor vascularity: PC3, which has very low vascularity, and the PC3-derived cancer stem-like cell holoclone PC3/2G7, which forms tumors with high microvessel density, high tumor blood flow, and low hypoxia compared with parental PC3 tumors. Three angiogenesis inhibitors (axitinib, sorafenib, and DC101) all induced significantly greater decreases in tumor blood flow and microvessel density in PC3/2G7 tumors compared with PC3 tumors, as well as significantly greater decreases in tumor cell proliferation and cell viability and a greater increase in apoptosis. The increased sensitivity of PC3/2G7 tumors to antiangiogenesis indicates they are less tolerant of low vascularity and suggests they become addicted to their oxygen- and nutrient-rich environment. PC3/2G7 tumors showed strong upregulation of the proangiogenic factors chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) and VEGFA compared with PC3 tumors, which may contribute to their increased vascularity, and they have significantly lower endothelial cell pericyte coverage, which may contribute to their greater sensitivity to antiangiogenesis. Interestingly, high levels of VEGF receptor-2 were expressed on PC3 but not PC3/2G7 tumor cells, which may contribute to the growth static response of PC3 tumors to VEGF-targeted antiangiogenesis. Finally, prolonged antiangiogenic treatment led to resumption of PC3/2G7 tumor growth and neovascularization, indicating these cancer stem-like cell-derived tumors can adapt and escape from antiangiogenesis.
针对肿瘤血管生成并抑制其生成的药物被广泛应用于癌症治疗。不同肿瘤的血管生成具有较大差异,但目前尚不清楚这些差异对血管生成抑制的反应性有何影响。我们使用两个密切相关的前列腺癌模型对此进行了研究,这两个模型在血管生成方面存在显著差异:PC3 肿瘤血管生成极低,而源自 PC3 的肿瘤干细胞样克隆 PC3/2G7 形成的肿瘤具有高微血管密度、高肿瘤血流和低缺氧,与亲本 PC3 肿瘤相比。三种血管生成抑制剂(阿昔替尼、索拉非尼和 DC101)均能显著降低 PC3/2G7 肿瘤的肿瘤血流和微血管密度,与 PC3 肿瘤相比,还能显著降低肿瘤细胞增殖和细胞活力,并增加细胞凋亡。PC3/2G7 肿瘤对血管生成抑制的敏感性增加表明它们对低血管生成的耐受性降低,这表明它们对富含氧气和营养的环境产生了依赖。与 PC3 肿瘤相比,PC3/2G7 肿瘤强烈上调了促血管生成因子趋化因子配体 2(CCL2)和 VEGFA,这可能有助于增加其血管生成,并且它们的内皮细胞周细胞覆盖率显著降低,这可能有助于其对血管生成抑制的敏感性增加。有趣的是,PC3 肿瘤而非 PC3/2G7 肿瘤细胞高表达血管内皮生长因子受体-2(VEGFR-2),这可能有助于 PC3 肿瘤对 VEGFA 靶向血管生成抑制的生长静止反应。最后,延长抗血管生成治疗导致 PC3/2G7 肿瘤的重新生长和新生血管形成,表明这些肿瘤干细胞样细胞衍生的肿瘤能够适应并逃避血管生成抑制。