Exercise Sciences Department, Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2013 May-Jun;33(3):173-9. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3182930c9f.
Despite its well-established benefits, cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is greatly underutilized globally. Barriers to its utilization have been identified in high-income countries. Given the growing epidemic of noncommunicable diseases in low- to middle-income countries, the identification of barriers to use of these low-cost interventions is warranted. The aim of this study was to describe and compare barriers to CR use in Brazilian and Canadian cardiac outpatients.
Two cardiac samples consisting of 237 Brazilian (recruited from 2 CR centers in southern Brazil) and 1434 Canadian (recruited from 11 community and academic hospitals in Ontario) outpatients were compared cross-sectionally. Barriers were assessed by using the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale, psychometrically validated in English and Portuguese. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare barriers between samples.
Overall, 139 (58.6%) Brazilian and 779 (54.3%) Canadian respondents were enrolled in CR. The mean total barriers score for Brazilian respondents was 1.71 ± 0.63, and 2.37 ± 1.0 (P < .01) for the Canadians. For 17 of 21 barriers, Canadians reported significantly greater barriers than Brazilians (P < .02). As their greatest barriers, Canadians rated already exercising at home or in the community and personal travel, while Brazilians identified distance to and cost of the CR program.
Despite the significantly lower availability of CR in Brazil and the universal health care system in Canada, cardiac outpatients in Canada perceived significantly greater CR barriers. Arguably, however, these barriers were more modifiable.
尽管心脏康复(CR)已被证实具有诸多益处,但它在全球范围内的应用仍远远不足。高收入国家已经确定了其应用的障碍。鉴于中低收入国家非传染性疾病的流行日益加剧,有必要确定这些低成本干预措施的应用障碍。本研究的目的是描述和比较巴西和加拿大心脏门诊患者使用 CR 的障碍。
本研究比较了 237 名巴西(招募自巴西南部的 2 个 CR 中心)和 1434 名加拿大(招募自安大略省的 11 个社区和学术医院)门诊患者的两个心脏样本。使用经过心理测量验证的英文和葡萄牙文版的心脏康复障碍量表评估障碍。采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验比较两组样本之间的障碍。
总体而言,139 名(58.6%)巴西和 779 名(54.3%)加拿大受访者参加了 CR。巴西受访者的平均总障碍得分为 1.71 ± 0.63,加拿大受访者的平均总障碍得分为 2.37 ± 1.0(P <.01)。在 21 个障碍中有 17 个,加拿大受访者报告的障碍明显大于巴西受访者(P <.02)。加拿大受访者认为最大的障碍是已经在家或在社区锻炼以及个人旅行,而巴西受访者则认为最大的障碍是 CR 项目的距离和费用。
尽管巴西的 CR 服务明显较少,而加拿大则实行全民医疗保健系统,但加拿大的心脏门诊患者感知到的 CR 障碍要大得多。然而,可以说这些障碍更具可操作性。