• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经健侧 C7 神经移位直接吻合修复外伤性臂丛根性撕脱后下干功能。

Contralateral C7 nerve transfer with direct coaptation to restore lower trunk function after traumatic brachial plexus avulsion.

机构信息

Department of Hand Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, No. 31 East Street of Xinjiekou, West District, Beijing 100035, Republic of China.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 May 1;95(9):821-7, S1-2. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00039.

DOI:10.2106/JBJS.L.00039
PMID:23636189
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contralateral C7 nerve transfer to the median nerve has been used in an attempt to restore finger flexion in patients with total brachial plexus avulsion injury. However, the results have not been satisfactory mainly because of the requirement to use a long bridging nerve graft, which causes an extended nerve regeneration process and irreversible muscle atrophy. A new procedure involving contralateral C7 nerve transfer via a modified prespinal route and direct coaptation with the injured lower trunk is presented here.

METHODS

Contralateral C7 nerve transfer via the modified prespinal route and direct coaptation with the injured lower trunk was performed in seventy-five patients with total brachial plexus avulsion injury. Thirty-five required humeral shortening osteotomy (3 to 4.5 cm) in order to accomplish the direct coaptation. The contralateral C7 nerve was also transferred to the musculocutaneous nerve through the bridging medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve arising from the lower trunk in forty-seven of the seventy-five patients. Recovery of finger, wrist, and elbow flexion was evaluated with use of the modified British Medical Research Council muscle grading system.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period (and standard deviation) was 57 ± 6 months (range, forty-eight to seventy-eight months). Motor function with a grade of M3+ or greater was attained in 60% of the patients for elbow flexion, 64% of the patients for finger flexion, 53% of the patients for thumb flexion, and 72% of the patients for wrist flexion.

CONCLUSIONS

Contralateral C7 nerve transfer via a modified prespinal route and direct coaptation with the injured lower trunk decreases the distance for nerve regeneration in patients with total brachial plexus avulsion injury. There was satisfactory recovery of finger flexion and wrist flexion in this series. In addition, contralateral C7 nerve transfer was successfully used to repair two different target nerves: the lower trunk and the musculocutaneous nerve.

摘要

背景

为了恢复全臂丛神经撕脱伤患者的手指屈曲功能,已经尝试进行对侧 C7 神经移位至正中神经。然而,结果并不令人满意,主要是因为需要使用长的桥接神经移植物,这导致了延长的神经再生过程和不可逆转的肌肉萎缩。本文介绍了一种新的手术方法,即通过改良的脊前途径进行对侧 C7 神经移位,并直接与损伤的下干吻合。

方法

对 75 例全臂丛神经撕脱伤患者进行了改良脊前途径对侧 C7 神经移位并直接与损伤的下干吻合。为了实现直接吻合,35 例患者需要肱骨缩短截骨术(3 至 4.5 厘米)。在这 75 例患者中的 47 例中,将对侧 C7 神经通过发自下干的桥接正中神经皮支转移至肌皮神经。采用改良的英国医学研究理事会肌肉分级系统评估手指、腕和肘屈曲的恢复情况。

结果

平均随访时间(标准差)为 57±6 个月(范围,48 至 78 个月)。60%的患者肘部屈曲运动功能达到 M3+或以上,64%的患者手指屈曲运动功能达到 M3+或以上,53%的患者拇指屈曲运动功能达到 M3+或以上,72%的患者腕部屈曲运动功能达到 M3+或以上。

结论

通过改良的脊前途径进行对侧 C7 神经移位并直接与损伤的下干吻合,可缩短全臂丛神经撕脱伤患者的神经再生距离。本系列患者的手指屈曲和腕部屈曲恢复情况令人满意。此外,对侧 C7 神经移位成功用于修复两个不同的靶神经:下干和肌皮神经。

相似文献

1
Contralateral C7 nerve transfer with direct coaptation to restore lower trunk function after traumatic brachial plexus avulsion.经健侧 C7 神经移位直接吻合修复外伤性臂丛根性撕脱后下干功能。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 May 1;95(9):821-7, S1-2. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00039.
2
[EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTRALATERAL C7 NERVE ROOT AND MULTIPLE NERVES TRANSFER FOR TREATMENT OF BRACHIAL PLEXUS ROOT AVULSION].[对侧C7神经根及多神经移位治疗臂丛神经根性撕脱伤的疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jun;28(6):737-40.
3
Complications of contralateral C-7 transfer through the modified prespinal route for repairing brachial plexus root avulsion injury: a retrospective study of 425 patients.经改良脊髓前入路行对侧C7神经移位修复臂丛神经根性撕脱伤的并发症:425例患者的回顾性研究
J Neurosurg. 2015 Jun;122(6):1421-8. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS131574. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
4
Contralateral C7 nerve root transfer to neurotize the upper trunk via a modified prespinal route in repair of brachial plexus avulsion injury.经改良椎管前置路对侧 C7 神经根移位至上干,修复臂丛神经撕脱伤。
Microsurgery. 2012 Mar;32(3):183-8. doi: 10.1002/micr.20963. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
5
Restoration of active pick-up function in patients with total brachial plexus avulsion injuries.全臂丛神经撕脱伤患者主动拾物功能的恢复
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2018 Mar;43(3):269-274. doi: 10.1177/1753193417728405. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
6
Contralateral C7 transfer via the prespinal and retropharyngeal route to repair brachial plexus root avulsion: a preliminary report.经脊柱前和咽后途径进行对侧C7转移修复臂丛神经根撕脱伤:初步报告
Neurosurgery. 2008 Sep;63(3):553-8; discussion 558-9. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000324729.03588.BA.
7
Minimum 4-year follow-up on contralateral C7 nerve transfers for brachial plexus injuries.对臂丛神经损伤进行对侧C7神经移位的至少4年随访。
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Feb;37(2):270-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.10.014. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
8
Contralateral C-7 transfer: is direct repair really superior to grafting?健侧 C7 神经移位术:直接修复真的优于移植吗?
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Jul;43(1):E3. doi: 10.3171/2017.4.FOCUS1794.
9
Prespinal Versus Conventional Hemicontralateral C7 Nerve Transfer in the Treatment of Total Brachial Plexus Roots Avulsion Injuries: A Retrospective Study With a Minimum Follow-Up Period of 4 Years.颈椎前路与传统半侧颈 7 神经移位术治疗全臂丛神经根撕脱伤:至少 4 年随访的回顾性研究。
J Hand Surg Am. 2023 Nov;48(11):1175.e1-1175.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.07.012. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
10
Comparative study of phrenic nerve transfers with and without nerve graft for elbow flexion after global brachial plexus injury.全臂丛神经损伤后带神经移植与不带神经移植的膈神经移位用于屈肘的比较研究
Injury. 2014 Jan;45(1):227-31. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.12.013. Epub 2013 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute shortening of upper extremity in orthopaedic patients: a scoping review.骨科患者上肢急性缩短:一项范围综述
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jun 11;51(1):225. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02904-9.
2
Femoral to sciatic nerve transfer: A cadaver study.股神经至坐骨神经移位术:一项尸体研究。
Surg Neurol Int. 2025 Feb 28;16:73. doi: 10.25259/SNI_60_2025. eCollection 2025.
3
Variation in the Distribution of the Middle Trunk: Potential Contraindication for C7 Harvest?中干分布的变异:C7 取骨的潜在禁忌证?
Indian J Plast Surg. 2024 Aug 12;57(Suppl 1):S133. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788897. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Restoration of intrinsic hand function by superficial radial nerve: an anatomical study.通过桡浅神经恢复手内在功能:解剖学研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Aug 2;24(1):628. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06758-3.
5
Is it possible to follow the risk of rupture after end-to-end nerve repairs in brachial plexus surgery? Technical note.神经端端吻合后臂丛神经外科手术中破裂风险能否得到随访?技术说明。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2023 May;57(3):120-123. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2023.22157.
6
CORR Insights®: What is the Elbow Flexion Strength After Free Functional Gracilis Muscle Transfer for Adult Traumatic Complete Brachial Plexus Injuries?CORR见解®:成人创伤性完全性臂丛神经损伤行游离功能性股薄肌转移术后的肘屈曲力量如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Dec 1;480(12):2406-2408. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002407. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
7
An electroencephalography-based human-machine interface combined with contralateral C7 transfer in the treatment of brachial plexus injury.一种基于脑电图的人机接口结合对侧C7转移术治疗臂丛神经损伤
Neural Regen Res. 2022 Dec;17(12):2600-2605. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.335838.
8
Improving Assessment of Disease Severity and Strategies for Monitoring Progression in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 4].改善退行性颈椎脊髓病严重程度评估及病情进展监测策略[AO脊柱RECODE-DCM研究优先事项编号4]
Global Spine J. 2022 Feb;12(1_suppl):64S-77S. doi: 10.1177/21925682211063854. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
9
Contralateral C7 Nerve Transfer for Stroke Recovery: New Frontier for Peripheral Nerve Surgery.对侧C7神经移位术促进中风恢复:周围神经外科的新前沿
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 29;10(15):3344. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153344.
10
"All in One or (W)hole in One Repair" for Adult Total Brachial Plexus Palsy.成人全臂丛神经麻痹的“一体化或整体修复”
Indian J Plast Surg. 2021 Jan;54(1):29-37. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1719196. Epub 2021 Mar 10.