• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理健康统计改进计划(MHSIP)家庭与青少年满意度调查的因子结构

Factor structure of the Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program (MHSIP) Family and Youth satisfaction surveys.

作者信息

Shafer Alan B, Temple Judith M

机构信息

Decision Support, Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Division, Texas Department of State Health Services, 909 West 45th St, Mail Code 2866, Austin, TX 78751, USA.

出版信息

J Behav Health Serv Res. 2013 Jul;40(3):306-16. doi: 10.1007/s11414-013-9332-4.

DOI:10.1007/s11414-013-9332-4
PMID:23636620
Abstract

Two studies of the Mental Health Statics Improvement Project (MHSIP) Family and Youth consumer satisfaction surveys factor structure and psychometrics were conducted. In study 1, the 2002-2006 Youth Services Survey for Families (N = 6,007) was administered to parents of children receiving services, and in study 2, the 2002-2004 Youth Services Survey (N = 1,718) was administered to children age 12-18 receiving services. Factor analyses across both studies found five factors that strongly supported the hypothesized scale domains of outcomes, satisfaction, cultural sensitivity, participation, and access. Scales based on these factors had good reliability with an average coefficient alpha of 0.85. The average convergent validity correlation between scale scores from the parent and child surveys was r = 0.62. Overall, the results supported the structure, reliability, and validity of the surveys.

摘要

开展了两项关于心理健康统计数据改善项目(MHSIP)家庭与青少年消费者满意度调查的因子结构和心理测量学的研究。在研究1中,对接受服务儿童的家长进行了2002 - 2006年家庭青少年服务调查(N = 6,007),在研究2中,对接受服务的12至18岁儿童进行了2002 - 2004年青少年服务调查(N = 1,718)。两项研究的因子分析均发现了五个因子,这些因子有力地支持了结果、满意度、文化敏感性、参与度和可及性等假设量表领域。基于这些因子的量表具有良好的信度,平均α系数为0.85。家长和儿童调查的量表得分之间的平均收敛效度相关性为r = 0.62。总体而言,结果支持了调查的结构、信度和效度。

相似文献

1
Factor structure of the Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program (MHSIP) Family and Youth satisfaction surveys.心理健康统计改进计划(MHSIP)家庭与青少年满意度调查的因子结构
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2013 Jul;40(3):306-16. doi: 10.1007/s11414-013-9332-4.
2
The Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program (MHSIP) Adult Consumer Satisfaction Survey Factor Structure and Relation to External Criteria.心理健康统计改进计划(MHSIP)成人消费者满意度调查的因子结构及其与外部标准的关系。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct;45(4):565-578. doi: 10.1007/s11414-018-9607-x.
3
Psychometrics of the MHSIP Adult Consumer Survey.MHSIP成人消费者调查的心理测量学
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct;33(4):483-8. doi: 10.1007/s11414-006-9033-3.
4
Toward a national consumer survey: evaluation of the CABHS and MHSIP instruments.迈向全国消费者调查:对CABHS和MHSIP工具的评估。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2001 Aug;28(3):347-69. doi: 10.1007/BF02287249.
5
The Parent Participation Engagement Measure (PPEM): Reliability and Validity in Child and Adolescent Community Mental Health Services.家长参与度评估量表(PPEM):儿童和青少年社区心理健康服务中的信度与效度
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2016 Sep;43(5):813-823. doi: 10.1007/s10488-015-0698-x.
6
Development and testing of a scale measuring parent satisfaction with staff interactions.一项衡量家长对员工互动满意度的量表的开发与测试。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2005 Jan-Mar;32(1):61-73. doi: 10.1007/BF02287328.
7
Satisfaction with Mental Health Navigation Services: Piloting an Evaluation with a New Scale.对心理健康导航服务的满意度:使用新量表进行试点评估
Community Ment Health J. 2018 Jul;54(5):521-532. doi: 10.1007/s10597-017-0201-0. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
8
The Youth Client Satisfaction Questionnaire: development, construct validation, and factor structure.青少年客户满意度调查问卷:编制、结构效度和因子结构
J Clin Child Psychol. 1997 Mar;26(1):87-98. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp2601_9.
9
Validation of the Children's Intrinsic Needs Satisfaction Scale among Canadian youth: psychometric properties, criterion-related validity and multitrait multimethod confirmatory factor analysis.验证加拿大青少年内在需求满足量表的心理测量特性、效标关联效度和多特质多方法验证性因子分析。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2019 Jan;39(1):25-32. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.39.1.03.
10
Evaluating a measure of social health derived from two mental health recovery measures: the California Quality of Life (CA-QOL) and Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program Consumer Survey (MHSIP).评估源自两项心理健康康复措施的社会健康衡量标准:加利福尼亚生活质量(CA-QOL)和心理健康统计数据改进计划消费者调查(MHSIP)。
Community Ment Health J. 2011 Aug;47(4):454-62. doi: 10.1007/s10597-010-9347-8. Epub 2010 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Community-based family peer navigator programme to facilitate linkage to coordinated specialty care for early psychosis among Black families in the USA: A protocol for a hybrid type I feasibility study.基于社区的家庭同伴导医计划,以促进美国黑人家庭早期精神病患者与协调专业护理的联系:一项混合 I 型可行性研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 5;13(7):e075729. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075729.
2
Revisiting caregiver satisfaction with children's mental health services in the United States.重新审视美国儿童心理健康服务中照顾者的满意度。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2021 Aug 28;15(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13033-021-00493-9.
3
Developing and implementing a culturally informed mily otivational ngagement trategy (FAMES) to increase family engagement in first episode psychosis programs: mixed methods pilot study protocol.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometrics of the MHSIP Adult Consumer Survey.MHSIP成人消费者调查的心理测量学
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct;33(4):483-8. doi: 10.1007/s11414-006-9033-3.
2
Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.提高邮寄问卷的回复率:系统评价
BMJ. 2002 May 18;324(7347):1183. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183.
3
How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies.患者满意度数据的有效性和可靠性如何?对195项研究的分析。
制定并实施一项基于文化的家庭动机参与策略(FAMES)以提高家庭对首发精神病项目的参与度:混合方法试点研究方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 26;10(8):e036907. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036907.
4
The Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program (MHSIP) Adult Consumer Satisfaction Survey Factor Structure and Relation to External Criteria.心理健康统计改进计划(MHSIP)成人消费者满意度调查的因子结构及其与外部标准的关系。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct;45(4):565-578. doi: 10.1007/s11414-018-9607-x.
5
The Parent Participation Engagement Measure (PPEM): Reliability and Validity in Child and Adolescent Community Mental Health Services.家长参与度评估量表(PPEM):儿童和青少年社区心理健康服务中的信度与效度
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2016 Sep;43(5):813-823. doi: 10.1007/s10488-015-0698-x.
Int J Qual Health Care. 1999 Aug;11(4):319-28. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/11.4.319.
4
The MHSIP mental health report card. A consumer-oriented approach to monitoring the quality of mental health plans. Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program.MHSIP心理健康报告卡。一种以消费者为导向的监测心理健康计划质量的方法。心理健康统计改进计划。
Eval Rev. 1997 Jun;21(3):330-41. doi: 10.1177/0193841X9702100307.
5
Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts.患者满意度:问题与概念综述
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Dec;45(12):1829-43. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00128-7.
6
Consumer satisfaction with mental health treatment.消费者对心理健康治疗的满意度。
Psychol Bull. 1982 Mar;91(2):244-59.