Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, 8-120 Clinical Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G3, Canada.
Can J Anaesth. 2013 Jul;60(7):692-9. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9951-5. Epub 2013 May 1.
Single-shot delivery of a supraclavicular brachial plexus block is effective for providing outpatient surgical anesthesia; however, patients generally must use oral analgesics to control pain shortly after discharge from the hospital. Catheterized delivery of supraclavicular blocks can be challenging to perform. We aimed to show that administering a second postoperative bolus of local anesthetic through a catheter placed by a catheter-over-needle assembly not only avoids time-consuming steps but also provides an extended analgesic effect compared with the traditional single-shot approach.
Patients were randomized into two groups: one group received a single-shot supraclavicular block with 25-30 mL of local anesthetic (1.5% lidocaine and 0.125% bupivacaine mixture), while the other group received a supraclavicular block via a catheter-over-needle assembly with the same volume and concentration of local anesthetic as for the single-shot block, which was followed by a second bolus of analgesic solution (0.2 % ropivacaine 20 mL) administered postoperatively through the catheter before its removal. The duration between the initial bolus and onset of pain was measured as well as the duration of pain relief from the last bolus.
Thirty patients were enrolled and randomized into the single-shot supraclavicular block group (n = 15) and the catheter-over-needle group (n = 15). One patient withdrew from the study, and five patients were lost to follow-up. We observed no significant difference between the two groups in time to perform the blocks. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) times were 3.1 (1.9) min and 4.4 (2.7) min for the top-up group and single-shot group, respectively (single-shot took 1.3 min longer than the catheter-over-needle group; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.65 to 3.25; P = 0.17). The mean (SD) duration of analgesia, measured from the beginning of the local anesthetic bolus to the onset of pain requiring rescue analgesia was 617.5 (288) min in the catheter-over-needle group and 377.2 (161.3) min in the single-shot control group (difference = 240.3 min; 95% CI: 46.8 to 433.8; P = 0.03).
Using the catheter-over-needle assembly for supraclavicular brachial plexus block facilitated effective delivery of a supplementary bolus of local anesthetic without extending the time to perform the block or increasing the number of steps. It also prolonged analgesia significantly compared with the single-shot approach. This trial was registered at: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT01522066.
单次肩胛上臂丛神经阻滞可有效提供门诊手术麻醉;然而,患者通常必须在出院后使用口服止痛药来控制疼痛。经导管置管的肩胛上神经阻滞可能难以操作。我们旨在表明,通过导管 - 针组件置入的导管给予第二次术后局部麻醉冲击不仅可以避免耗时的步骤,而且与传统的单次注射方法相比,还可以提供延长的镇痛效果。
患者随机分为两组:一组接受单次肩胛上神经阻滞,注入 25-30ml 局部麻醉剂(1.5%利多卡因和 0.125%布比卡因混合物);另一组通过导管 - 针组件接受肩胛上神经阻滞,注入与单次注射相同体积和浓度的局部麻醉剂,随后通过导管给予术后第二剂镇痛溶液(0.2%罗哌卡因 20ml),在导管拔除前使用。测量从初始冲击到疼痛发作的时间以及从最后一次冲击开始到疼痛缓解的时间。
30 名患者入组并随机分为单次肩胛上神经阻滞组(n=15)和导管 - 针组(n=15)。1 名患者退出研究,5 名患者失访。我们观察到两组进行阻滞的时间没有显著差异。单次注射组和导管 - 针组的平均(标准差[SD])时间分别为 3.1(1.9)min 和 4.4(2.7)min(单次注射组比导管 - 针组多 1.3min;95%置信区间[CI]:-0.65 至 3.25;P=0.17)。导管 - 针组的平均(SD)镇痛持续时间,从局部麻醉冲击开始到需要解救性镇痛的疼痛发作,为 617.5(288)min,单次注射对照组为 377.2(161.3)min(差异=240.3min;95%CI:46.8 至 433.8;P=0.03)。
使用导管 - 针组件进行肩胛上臂丛神经阻滞可方便地给予补充局部麻醉冲击,而不会延长阻滞时间或增加操作步骤。与单次注射方法相比,它还显著延长了镇痛时间。本试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号:NCT01522066。