• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健中的跨专业实践:定制过程模型的开发。

Interprofessional practice in primary care: development of a tailored process model.

机构信息

Research Center of Autonomy and Participation for Persons with a Chronic Illness, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2013 Apr 17;6:139-47. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S42594. Print 2013.

DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S42594
PMID:23637540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3634320/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study investigated the improvement of interprofessional practice in primary care by performing the first three steps of the implementation model described by Grol et al. This article describes the targets for improvement in a setting for children with complex care needs (step 1), the identification of barriers and facilitators influencing interprofessional practice (step 2), and the development of a tailored interprofessional process model (step 3).

METHODS

In step 2, thirteen qualitative semistructured interviews were held with several stakeholders, including parents of children, an occupational therapist, a speech and language therapist, a physical therapist, the manager of the team, two general practitioners, a psychologist, and a primary school teacher. The data were analyzed using directed content analysis and using the domains of the Chronic Care Model as a framework. In step 3, a project group was formed to develop helpful strategies, including the development of an interprofessional process through process mapping.

RESULTS

In step 2, it was found that the most important barriers to implementing interprofessional practice related to the lack of structure in the care process. A process model for interprofessional primary care was developed for the target group.

CONCLUSION

The lack of a shared view of what is involved in the process of interprofessional practice was the most important barrier to its successful implementation. It is suggested that the tailored process developed, supported with the appropriate tools, may provide both professional staff and their clients, in this setting but also in other areas of primary care, with insight to the care process and a clear representation of "who should do what, when, and how."

摘要

目的

本研究通过执行 Grol 等人描述的实施模型的前三步,探讨了在初级保健中改善跨专业实践的方法。本文描述了在有复杂护理需求的儿童环境中(第 1 步)需要改进的目标、识别影响跨专业实践的障碍和促进因素(第 2 步),以及制定量身定制的跨专业流程模型(第 3 步)。

方法

在第 2 步中,与多个利益相关者(包括儿童的父母、职业治疗师、言语和语言治疗师、物理治疗师、团队经理、两名全科医生、心理学家和小学教师)进行了 13 次半结构化访谈。使用定向内容分析对数据进行分析,并使用慢性病护理模型的领域作为框架。在第 3 步中,成立了一个项目小组来制定有益的策略,包括通过流程映射制定跨专业流程。

结果

在第 2 步中,发现实施跨专业实践的最重要障碍是护理过程缺乏结构。为目标群体制定了跨专业初级保健的流程模型。

结论

缺乏对跨专业实践过程的共同理解是其成功实施的最大障碍。建议,为特定环境中的专业人员及其客户(也包括初级保健的其他领域)量身定制的流程,并辅以适当的工具,可能提供对护理过程的深入了解,并清楚地表示“谁应该在何时、何地以及如何做什么”。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7217/3634320/d969d4b7d67c/jmdh-6-139f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7217/3634320/d969d4b7d67c/jmdh-6-139f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7217/3634320/d969d4b7d67c/jmdh-6-139f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Interprofessional practice in primary care: development of a tailored process model.初级保健中的跨专业实践:定制过程模型的开发。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2013 Apr 17;6:139-47. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S42594. Print 2013.
2
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
3
External facilitators and interprofessional facilitation teams: a qualitative study of their roles in supporting practice change.外部促进者与跨专业促进团队:关于其在支持实践变革中所起作用的定性研究
Implement Sci. 2016 Jul 16;11:97. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0458-7.
4
Medication reviews in hospitalized patients: a qualitative study on perceptions of primary and secondary care providers on interprofessional collaboration.住院患者的药物治疗审查:一项关于初级和二级保健提供者对跨专业合作的看法的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):902. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05744-y.
5
Barriers and Facilitators Affecting Patient Portal Implementation from an Organizational Perspective: Qualitative Study.从组织角度看影响患者门户网站实施的障碍与促进因素:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 11;20(5):e183. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8989.
6
Models of maternity care in rural environments: barriers and attributes of interprofessional collaboration with midwives.农村环境中的孕产护理模式:与助产士开展跨专业合作的障碍和特征。
Midwifery. 2013 Jun;29(6):646-52. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
7
Interprofessional collaboration regarding patients' care plans in primary care: a focus group study into influential factors.基层医疗中关于患者护理计划的跨专业协作:一项关于影响因素的焦点小组研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 May 28;17:58. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0456-5.
8
[Interprofessional education for patient-centred practice: development of outcome-focused competencies for a Bachelor Programme Interprofessional Health Care].以患者为中心的跨专业实践教育:本科跨专业医疗保健课程聚焦成果的能力培养
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(7):523-32. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 May 9.
9
Shared decision-making and interprofessional collaboration in mental healthcare: a qualitative study exploring perceptions of barriers and facilitators.精神卫生保健中的共同决策和跨专业合作:探索障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
J Interprof Care. 2013 Sep;27(5):373-9. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2013.785503. Epub 2013 May 16.
10
Facilitators and Barriers for Interprofessional Rounding: A Qualitative Study.跨专业查房的促进因素与障碍:一项定性研究。
Clin Nurse Spec. 2017 Jul/Aug;31(4):219-228. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000310.

引用本文的文献

1
Process mapping in healthcare: a systematic review.医疗保健中的流程映射:一项系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 14;21(1):342. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06254-1.
2
Interprofessional collaboration among health professionals in cleft lip and palate treatment and care in the public health sector of South Africa.南非公共卫生部门中从事唇腭裂治疗和护理的卫生专业人员之间的跨专业合作。
Hum Resour Health. 2021 Feb 27;19(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12960-021-00566-3.
3
Key constituents for integration of care for children assisted with long-term home ventilation: a European study.

本文引用的文献

1
Disease management projects and the Chronic Care Model in action: baseline qualitative research.疾病管理项目和慢性病照护模式的实践:基线定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 May 11;12:114. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-114.
2
Interprofessional collaboration: one or multiple realities?跨专业协作:一种还是多种现实情况?
J Interprof Care. 2012 Jul;26(4):256-8. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2011.652785. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
3
A scoping review to improve conceptual clarity of interprofessional interventions.一项范围综述,旨在提高跨专业干预措施的概念清晰度。
长期家庭通气治疗儿童的整合护理关键要素:一项欧洲研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Feb 15;20(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-1979-4.
4
Children's complex care needs: a systematic concept analysis of multidisciplinary language.儿童复杂护理需求:多学科语言的系统概念分析。
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Nov;177(11):1641-1652. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3216-9. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
5
From simplicity towards complexity: the Italian multidimensional approach to obesity.从简单到复杂:意大利对肥胖症的多维研究方法。
Eat Weight Disord. 2014;19(3):387-94. doi: 10.1007/s40519-013-0097-9. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
J Interprof Care. 2011 May;25(3):167-74. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2010.529960. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
4
Unmet health care needs among CSHCN with neurologic conditions.具有神经疾病的儿童期慢性病患者的未满足医疗需求。
Pediatrics. 2009 Dec;124 Suppl 4:S343-51. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1255D.
5
SWOT analysis of a pediatric rehabilitation programme: a participatory evaluation fostering quality improvement.一项儿科康复计划的SWOT分析:促进质量改进的参与式评估
Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(16):1373-81. doi: 10.1080/09638280802532696.
6
Evidence on the Chronic Care Model in the new millennium.新千年中慢性病照护模式的相关证据。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):75-85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.75.
7
Evaluating patient care communication in integrated care settings: application of a mixed method approach in cerebral palsy programs.评估综合医疗环境中的患者护理沟通:混合方法在脑瘫项目中的应用。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2009 Feb;21(1):58-65. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn053. Epub 2008 Dec 5.
8
Evaluating quality of patient care communication in integrated care settings: a mixed method approach.评估综合医疗环境中患者护理沟通的质量:一种混合方法。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Oct;19(5):281-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm029. Epub 2007 Jul 31.
9
Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives.规划与研究患者护理的改善:理论视角的运用
Milbank Q. 2007;85(1):93-138. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00478.x.
10
Understanding the complexity of redesigning care around the clinical microsystem.理解围绕临床微观系统重新设计护理的复杂性。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Dec;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i10-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015859.