Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 24;8(4):e62172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062172. Print 2013.
Bone is able to react to changing mechanical demands by adapting its internal microstructure through bone forming and resorbing cells. This process is called bone modeling and remodeling. It is evident that changes in mechanical demands at the organ level must be interpreted at the tissue level where bone (re)modeling takes place. Although assumed for a long time, the relationship between the locations of bone formation and resorption and the local mechanical environment is still under debate. The lack of suitable imaging modalities for measuring bone formation and resorption in vivo has made it difficult to assess the mechanoregulation of bone three-dimensionally by experiment. Using in vivo micro-computed tomography and high resolution finite element analysis in living mice, we show that bone formation most likely occurs at sites of high local mechanical strain (p<0.0001) and resorption at sites of low local mechanical strain (p<0.0001). Furthermore, the probability of bone resorption decreases exponentially with increasing mechanical stimulus (R(2) = 0.99) whereas the probability of bone formation follows an exponential growth function to a maximum value (R(2) = 0.99). Moreover, resorption is more strictly controlled than formation in loaded animals, and ovariectomy increases the amount of non-targeted resorption. Our experimental assessment of mechanoregulation at the tissue level does not show any evidence of a lazy zone and suggests that around 80% of all (re)modeling can be linked to the mechanical micro-environment. These findings disclose how mechanical stimuli at the tissue level contribute to the regulation of bone adaptation at the organ level.
骨骼能够通过成骨细胞和破骨细胞来改变其内部微观结构,从而对不断变化的机械需求做出反应。这个过程被称为骨重建。显然,器官水平的机械需求变化必须在发生骨(重建)的组织水平上进行解释。尽管长期以来一直假设,但骨形成和吸收的位置与局部机械环境之间的关系仍存在争议。缺乏合适的成像方式来测量体内的骨形成和吸收,使得通过实验来评估骨的三维机械调节变得困难。通过在活鼠体内使用微计算机断层扫描和高分辨率有限元分析,我们发现骨形成最可能发生在局部机械应变高的部位(p<0.0001),而骨吸收发生在局部机械应变低的部位(p<0.0001)。此外,骨吸收的概率随着机械刺激的增加呈指数下降(R²=0.99),而骨形成的概率则遵循指数增长函数至最大值(R²=0.99)。此外,在负荷动物中,吸收比形成受到更严格的控制,卵巢切除术会增加非靶向吸收的量。我们在组织水平上对机械调节的实验评估没有显示出任何懒惰区的证据,并表明大约 80%的(重建)都可以与机械微环境联系起来。这些发现揭示了组织水平的机械刺激如何有助于调节器官水平的骨骼适应。