Suppr超能文献

使用激素管理奶牛的繁殖力:兽医从业者的临床和伦理信念。

Using hormones to manage dairy cow fertility: the clinical and ethical beliefs of veterinary practitioners.

机构信息

Population Health and Welfare Group, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, United Kingdom. mailto:

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Apr 26;8(4):e62993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062993. Print 2013.

Abstract

In the face of a steady decline in dairy cow fertility over several decades, using hormones to assist reproduction has become common. In the European Union, hormones are prescription-only medicines, giving veterinary practitioners a central role in their deployment. This study explored the clinical and ethical beliefs of practitioners, and provides data on their current prescribing practices. During 2011, 93 practitioners working in England completed a questionnaire (95% response rate). Of the 714 non-organic farms they attended, only 4 farms (0.6%) never used hormones to assist the insemination of lactating dairy cows. Practitioners agreed (>80%) that hormones improve fertility and farm businesses profitability. They also agreed (>80%) that if farmers are able to tackle management issues contributing to poor oestrus expression, then over a five year period these outcomes would both improve, relative to using hormones instead. If management issues are addressed instead of prescribing hormones, practitioners envisaged a less favourable outcome for veterinary practices profitability (p<0.01), but an improvement in genetic selection for fertility (p<0.01) and overall cow welfare (p<0.01). On farms making no efforts to address underlying management problems, long-term routine use at the start of breeding for timing artificial insemination or inducing oestrus was judged "unacceptable" by 69% and 48% of practitioners, respectively. In contrast, practitioners agreed (≥ 90%) that both these types of use are acceptable, provided a period of time has been allowed to elapse during which the cow is observed for natural oestrus. Issues discussed include: weighing quality versus length of cow life, fiscal factors, legal obligations, and balancing the interests of all stakeholders, including the increasing societal demand for food. This research fosters debate and critical appraisal, contributes to veterinary ethics, and encourages the pro-active development of professional codes of conduct.

摘要

面对几十年来奶牛生育率持续下降的局面,使用激素来辅助繁殖已经变得很普遍。在欧盟,激素是处方药物,这使得兽医从业者在其使用中扮演着核心角色。本研究探讨了从业者的临床和伦理信念,并提供了他们当前处方实践的数据。2011 年期间,在英格兰工作的 93 名从业者完成了一份问卷(响应率为 95%)。在他们所服务的 714 家非有机农场中,只有 4 家(0.6%)从未使用激素来辅助泌乳奶牛的授精。从业者一致(>80%)认为激素可以提高繁殖率和农场的盈利能力。他们还一致(>80%)认为,如果农民能够解决导致发情表现不佳的管理问题,那么在五年内,与使用激素相比,这些结果都会得到改善。如果解决管理问题而不是开激素处方,从业者预计兽医业务盈利能力会下降(p<0.01),但在生育力的遗传选择方面会有所改善(p<0.01),整体奶牛福利也会有所提高(p<0.01)。在没有努力解决潜在管理问题的农场中,69%和 48%的从业者分别认为在配种开始时为了人工授精的时间或诱导发情而长期常规使用是“不可接受的”。相比之下,从业者一致(≥90%)认为,只要给奶牛留出观察自然发情的时间,这两种用途都是可以接受的。讨论的问题包括:权衡奶牛生命的质量和长度、财务因素、法律义务以及平衡所有利益相关者的利益,包括日益增长的社会对食品的需求。这项研究促进了辩论和批判性评估,有助于兽医伦理,并鼓励积极制定专业行为准则。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/932f/3637166/2f355f8289f6/pone.0062993.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验