Dobson Hilary, Routly Jean Elsie, Smith Robert Frank
Institute of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, England.
Anim Reprod. 2020 Aug 21;17(3):e20200017. doi: 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2020-0017.
The environment contributes to production diseases that in turn badly affect cow performance, fertility and culling. Oestrus intensity is lower in lame cows, and in all cows 26% potential oestrus events are not expressed (to avoid getting pregnant). To understand these trade-offs, we need to know how animals react to their environment and how the environment influences hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) interactions with the hypothalamus-pituitary-ovarian axis (HPO). Neurotransmitters control secretion of GnRH into hypophyseal portal blood. GnRH/LH pulse amplitude and frequency drive oestradiol production, culminating in oestrus behaviour and a precisely-timed GnRH/LH surge, all of which are disrupted by poor environments. Responses to peripheral neuronal agents give clues about mechanisms, but do these drugs alter perception of stimuli, or suppress consequent responses? studies confirm some neuronal interactions between the HPA and HPO; and immuno-histochemistry clarifies the location and sequence of inter-neurone activity within the brain. In both species, exogenous corticoids, ACTH and/or CRH act at the pituitary (reduce LH release by GnRH), and hypothalamus (lower GnRH pulse frequency and delay surge release). This requires inter-neurones as GnRH cells do not have receptors for HPA compounds. There are two (simultaneous, therefore fail-safe?) pathways for CRH suppression of GnRH release via CRH-Receptors: one being the regulation of kisspeptin/dynorphin and other cell types in the hypothalamus, and the other being the direct contact between CRH and GnRH cell terminals in the median eminence. When we domesticate animals, we must provide the best possible environment otherwise animals trade-off with lower production, less intense oestrus behaviour, and impaired fertility. Avoiding life-time peri-parturient problems by managing persistent lactations in cows may be a worthy trade-off on both welfare and economic terms - better than the camouflage use of drugs/hormones/feed additives/intricate technologies? In the long term, getting animals and environment in a more harmonious balance is the ultimate strategy.
环境会引发生产性疾病,进而严重影响奶牛的生产性能、繁殖能力和淘汰率。跛足奶牛的发情强度较低,并且在所有奶牛中,26%的潜在发情事件未表现出来(为了避免怀孕)。为了理解这些权衡取舍,我们需要了解动物如何对其环境做出反应,以及环境如何影响下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴(HPA)与下丘脑-垂体-卵巢轴(HPO)之间的相互作用。神经递质控制促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)分泌进入垂体门脉血。GnRH/LH脉冲幅度和频率驱动雌二醇的产生,最终导致发情行为和精确 timing 的 GnRH/LH 激增,所有这些都会因恶劣环境而受到干扰。对外周神经元介质的反应为机制提供了线索,但这些药物是改变了对刺激的感知,还是抑制了随后的反应呢?研究证实了 HPA 和 HPO 之间的一些神经元相互作用;免疫组织化学阐明了脑内神经元间活动的位置和顺序。在这两个物种中,外源性皮质类固醇、促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)和/或促肾上腺皮质激素释放激素(CRH)作用于垂体(通过 GnRH 减少 LH 释放)和下丘脑(降低 GnRH 脉冲频率并延迟激增释放)。这需要中间神经元,因为 GnRH 细胞没有 HPA 化合物的受体。CRH 通过 CRH 受体抑制 GnRH 释放有两条(同时存在,因此是万无一失的?)途径:一条是调节下丘脑内的 kisspeptin/强啡肽和其他细胞类型,另一条是 CRH 与正中隆起处的 GnRH 细胞终末直接接触。当我们驯化动物时,我们必须提供尽可能好的环境,否则动物会以较低的产量、不太强烈的发情行为和受损的繁殖能力为代价进行权衡。通过管理奶牛的持续泌乳来避免终身围产期问题,从福利和经济角度来看可能是一个值得的权衡——比伪装使用药物/激素/饲料添加剂/复杂技术更好?从长远来看,使动物与环境达到更和谐的平衡是最终策略。