Department of Operative Dentistry, Nihon University School of Dentistry, Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 May-Jul;71(3-4):820-7. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2012.734405.
To determine the localized wear and flexural properties of flowable resin composites for posterior lesions compared with universal resin composites produced by the same manufacturers.
Ten specimens of each of three flowable resins, G-ænial Universal Flo, G-ænial Flo and Clearfil Majesty Flow, and the corresponding resin composite materials, Kalore and Clearfil Majesty Esthetics, were prepared in custom fixtures and subjected to 400,000 wear machine cycles to simulate localized wear. The total maximum depth and volume loss of the wear facets was calculated for each specimen using a profilometer. A three-point bending test was performed to determine the flexural strength, modulus of elasticity and resilience. Values were statistically compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test.
The wear depth ranged from 58.3-126.9 m and the volumetric loss ranged from 0.019-0.049 mm(3), with significant differences observed between restorative materials. The wear depth of G-ænial Universal Flo was significantly smaller than those of the other resin composites tested. The flexural strengths and elastic modulus ranged from 90.5-135.1 MPa and from 4.7-7.6 GPa, respectively. A significantly greater flexural strength and higher elastic modulus was found for G-ænial Universal Flo than the other composites.
The wear and mechanical properties of the flowable resin composites tested suggested improved performance compared with universal resin composites.
与同制造商生产的通用型树脂复合材料相比,确定用于后牙缺损的流动性树脂复合材料的局部磨损和弯曲性能。
在定制的夹具中制备三种流动性树脂(G-ænial Universal Flo、G-ænial Flo 和 Clearfil Majesty Flow)和相应的树脂复合材料(Kalore 和 Clearfil Majesty Esthetics)的每个材料各 10 个试件,并对其进行 400,000 次磨损机循环以模拟局部磨损。使用轮廓仪计算每个试件的磨损面的总最大深度和体积损失。进行三点弯曲试验以确定弯曲强度、弹性模量和弹性。使用单向方差分析(ANOVA),然后使用 Tukey 的Honestly Significant Difference(HSD)检验对值进行统计比较。
磨损深度范围为 58.3-126.9μm,体积损失范围为 0.019-0.049mm3,各修复材料之间存在显著差异。G-ænial Universal Flo 的磨损深度明显小于其他测试的树脂复合材料。弯曲强度和弹性模量范围分别为 90.5-135.1MPa 和 4.7-7.6GPa。与其他复合材料相比,G-ænial Universal Flo 的弯曲强度和弹性模量显著更高。
测试的流动性树脂复合材料的磨损和机械性能表明其性能优于通用型树脂复合材料。