Liu Hongjie, Li Jianhua, Ha Toan, Li Jian
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.
Soc Netw. 2012 Oct 16;1(2):13-21. doi: 10.4236/sn.2012.12002.
BACKGROUND: One of the key assumptions in respondent-driven sampling (RDS) analysis, called "random selection assumption," is that respondents randomly recruit their peers from their personal networks. The objective of this study was to verify this assumption in the empirical data of egocentric networks. METHODS: We conducted an egocentric network study among young drug users in China, in which RDS was used to recruit this hard-to-reach population. If the random recruitment assumption holds, the RDS-estimated population proportions should be similar to the actual population proportions. Following this logic, we first calculated the population proportions of five visible variables (gender, age, education, marital status, and drug use mode) among the total drug-use alters from which the RDS sample was drawn, and then estimated the RDS-adjusted population proportions and their 95% confidence intervals in the RDS sample. Theoretically, if the random recruitment assumption holds, the 95% confidence intervals estimated in the RDS sample should include the population proportions calculated in the total drug-use alters. RESULTS: The evaluation of the RDS sample indicated its success in reaching the convergence of RDS compositions and including a broad cross-section of the hidden population. Findings demonstrate that the random selection assumption holds for three group traits, but not for two others. Specifically, egos randomly recruited subjects in different age groups, marital status, or drug use modes from their network alters, but not in gender and education levels. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the occurrence of non-random recruitment, indicating that the recruitment of subjects in this RDS study was not completely at random. Future studies are needed to assess the extent to which the population proportion estimates can be biased when the violation of the assumption occurs in some group traits in RDS samples.
背景:应答驱动抽样(RDS)分析中的一个关键假设,即“随机选择假设”,是指受访者从其个人网络中随机招募同龄人。本研究的目的是在自我中心网络的实证数据中验证这一假设。 方法:我们在中国年轻吸毒者中开展了一项自我中心网络研究,其中使用RDS来招募这一难以接触到的人群。如果随机招募假设成立,RDS估计的人群比例应与实际人群比例相似。按照这一逻辑,我们首先计算了RDS样本所抽取的全部吸毒关联者中五个可见变量(性别、年龄、教育程度、婚姻状况和吸毒方式)的人群比例,然后估计了RDS样本中经RDS调整后的人群比例及其95%置信区间。从理论上讲,如果随机招募假设成立,RDS样本中估计的95%置信区间应包括在全部吸毒关联者中计算出的人群比例。 结果:对RDS样本的评估表明其成功实现了RDS构成的收敛,并涵盖了隐藏人群的广泛横截面。研究结果表明,随机选择假设对三个群体特征成立,但对另外两个特征不成立。具体而言,自我中心者从其网络关联者中随机招募不同年龄组、婚姻状况或吸毒方式的受试者,但在性别和教育程度方面并非如此。 结论:本研究证明了非随机招募的存在,表明该RDS研究中受试者的招募并非完全随机。未来需要开展研究,以评估当RDS样本中的某些群体特征出现假设违背情况时,人群比例估计可能产生的偏差程度。
Am J Epidemiol. 2018-1-1
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013-7-17
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2019-3-21
Am J Epidemiol. 2018-1-1
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2015-1
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2016-4
Sociol Methodol. 2010-8
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010-3-29
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2009-10
Stat Med. 2009-7-30
Int J Drug Policy. 2008-6