Suppr超能文献

基于序贯法实验的半数致死剂量(LD50)区间估计。

Interval estimation of the LD50 based on an up-and-down experiment.

作者信息

Choi S C

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23298-0032.

出版信息

Biometrics. 1990 Jun;46(2):485-92.

PMID:2364133
Abstract

It is well known that an up-and-down method can be more efficient than fixed-sample methods in estimating the LD50 of a quantal response curve. A problem that has not been addressed by many is that of obtaining a confidence interval for the LD50 from the up-and-down method. Dixon and Mood (1948, Journal of the American Statistical Association 43, 109-126) proposed a confidence interval using a maximum likelihood approach, but not much is known about its properties. In this paper, a new confidence interval for the LD50 based on turning points is obtained, which uses the concept of phi-mixing. Simulation results indicate that the coverage probabilities of both methods tend to be less than the nominal level unless the sample size is large. Even so, when the tolerance distribution is normal, the proposed confidence interval is found to be superior to Dixon's interval in terms of the coverage, the width, and stability. The advantages of the method do not appear to hold in the presence of nonnormal tolerance distribution.

摘要

众所周知,在估计剂量反应曲线的半数致死剂量(LD50)时,序贯法可能比固定样本量法更有效。许多人尚未解决的一个问题是如何从序贯法中获得LD50的置信区间。迪克森和穆德(1948年,《美国统计协会杂志》43卷,第109 - 126页)提出了一种基于最大似然法的置信区间,但对其性质了解不多。在本文中,基于转折点得到了一种新的LD50置信区间,该区间使用了φ混合的概念。模拟结果表明,除非样本量很大,两种方法的覆盖概率往往都低于名义水平。即便如此,当耐受分布为正态时,所提出的置信区间在覆盖范围、区间宽度和稳定性方面均优于迪克森区间。在非正态耐受分布的情况下,该方法的优势似乎并不成立。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验