• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良无牙颌牙槽嵴扩展技术与即刻种植植入:3年随访

Modified edentulous ridge expansion technique and immediate implant placement: a 3-year follow-up.

作者信息

Santagata Mario, Guariniello Luigi, Tartaro Gianpaolo

机构信息

Department of Head and Neck Pathologies, Oral Cavity and Audio-Verbal Communication, University Hospital (AOU) - Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

J Oral Implantol. 2015 Apr;41(2):184-7. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00308. Epub 2013 May 3.

DOI:10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00308
PMID:23641728
Abstract

Restoration of the edentulous alveolar ridge with implants often requires the ridge width to be augmented to allow its placement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the split-crest technique, with subepithelial connective tissue graft used as biological barrier, in patients with narrow ridges, focusing on the status of soft and hard tissues and on implant success rate, at 36 months after implant loading. Thirteen patients (6 males and 7 females), ages 32-68 years (mean 49.4 years) with an atrophic maxillary jaw underwent modified edentulous ridge expansion technique for implant placement. A total of 33 Laser-Lok tapered internal implant, were placed in the maxilla. The following parameters were evaluated: (1) initial ridge width (time t0); (2) ridge width at the time of abutment connection (time t1); four months after implants placement, healing abutments were connected and the prosthetic rehabilitation was initiated, and all patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically with periapical radiograph at intervals of 3-6 months for the first year and annually thereafter for 3 years. The ridge width was measured with a cone beam computed tomography. The initial ridge width ranged from 3.5 mm to 7 mm (mean: 4.67 mm), while at the end of the expansion procedure the width ranged from 6.3 mm to 11.0 mm (mean: 8.2 mm). The width gain of the edentulous ridge ranged from 1.45-4.9 mm (mean: 3.5 mm). Two implants became exposed 1 month after surgery. One implant was lost before loading (3%). The diameter of failed implant was 5.8 mm and length was 10.5 mm. The remaining 32 implants were stable and free of complications at the end of the study. Thus, the implant survival rate was 97%. Because no implant failed after loading, the cumulative survival rate of loaded implants was 100%. The minimally invasive regenerative technique presented here avoids the use of bone graft, secondary surgery for soft tissue augmentation, and mechanical expansion devices. However, the follow-up period for outcome evaluation and exiguous patient's number in this series was limited.

摘要

使用种植体修复无牙牙槽嵴通常需要增加牙槽嵴宽度以利于种植体植入。本研究旨在评估在窄牙槽嵴患者中采用以龈下结缔组织移植作为生物屏障的劈嵴技术,重点关注种植体加载后36个月时软硬组织的状况及种植体成功率。13例患者(6例男性和7例女性),年龄32 - 68岁(平均49.4岁),上颌骨萎缩,接受了改良的无牙嵴扩展技术以植入种植体。共在上颌植入33枚Laser - Lok锥形内部种植体。评估了以下参数:(1)初始牙槽嵴宽度(时间t0);(2)基台连接时的牙槽嵴宽度(时间t1);种植体植入4个月后,连接愈合基台并开始进行修复康复,所有患者在第一年每隔3 - 6个月进行临床和根尖片影像学评估,此后每年评估3年。使用锥形束计算机断层扫描测量牙槽嵴宽度。初始牙槽嵴宽度为3.5毫米至7毫米(平均:4.67毫米),而在扩展程序结束时宽度为6.3毫米至11.0毫米(平均:8.2毫米)。无牙牙槽嵴的宽度增加范围为1.45 - 4.9毫米(平均:3.5毫米)。术后1个月有2枚种植体暴露。1枚种植体在加载前丢失(3%)。失败种植体的直径为5.8毫米,长度为10.5毫米。研究结束时,其余32枚种植体稳定且无并发症。因此,种植体存活率为97%。由于加载后无种植体失败,加载种植体的累积存活率为100%。此处介绍的微创再生技术避免了使用骨移植、软组织增量的二次手术以及机械扩展装置。然而,本系列中用于结果评估的随访期有限且患者数量较少。

相似文献

1
Modified edentulous ridge expansion technique and immediate implant placement: a 3-year follow-up.改良无牙颌牙槽嵴扩展技术与即刻种植植入:3年随访
J Oral Implantol. 2015 Apr;41(2):184-7. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00308. Epub 2013 May 3.
2
Alternative bone expansion technique for implant placement in atrophic edentulous maxilla and mandible.用于在上颌和下颌萎缩无牙颌中植入种植体的替代性骨扩张技术。
J Oral Implantol. 2011 Aug;37(4):463-71. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00028. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
3
Ridge expansion alone or in combination with guided bone regeneration to facilitate implant placement in narrow alveolar ridges: a retrospective study.单纯牙槽嵴扩展或联合引导骨再生以促进在狭窄牙槽嵴中植入种植体:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Feb;26(2):204-11. doi: 10.1111/clr.12317. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
4
Clinical evaluation of split-crest technique with ultrasonic bone surgery for narrow ridge expansion: status of soft and hard tissues and implant success.超声骨刀法劈开颊侧皮质骨技术在牙槽嵴窄小患者扩宽中的临床评价:软硬组织及种植体的稳定性。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Apr;15(2):176-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00340.x. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
5
Definitive CAD/CAM-guided prosthesis for immediate loading of bone-grafted maxilla: a case report.用于即刻种植骨移植上颌骨的确定性计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造引导式修复体:病例报告
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006;8(3):161-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00018.x.
6
Dental implants placed in expanded narrow edentulous ridges with the Extension Crest device. A 1-3-year multicenter follow-up study.使用延伸嵴装置在扩展的狭窄无牙嵴中植入牙种植体。一项为期1至3年的多中心随访研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Jun;17(3):265-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01196.x.
7
One-step surgical placement of Brånemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study.布伦马克种植体的一步式手术植入:一项前瞻性多中心临床研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997 Jul-Aug;12(4):454-62.
8
Ridge expansion and immediate placement with piezosurgery and screw expanders in atrophic maxillary sites: two case reports.萎缩性上颌骨部位使用压电手术和螺钉扩张器进行牙槽嵴扩张及即刻种植:两例病例报告
J Oral Implantol. 2013 Feb;39(1):85-90. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00124. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
9
Augmentation in two stages of atrophic alveolar bone prior to dental rehabilitation: a case report.牙修复前萎缩性牙槽骨两阶段增量:一例报告
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007 Sep 1;8(6):57-63.
10
Vertical alveolar ridge expansion and simultaneous implant placement in posterior maxilla using segmental osteotomy: report of two cases.使用节段性截骨术在上颌后牙区进行垂直牙槽嵴扩展并同期植入种植体:两例报告
J Oral Implantol. 2008;34(6):313-8. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336-34.6.313.

引用本文的文献

1
The efficacy of alveolar ridge split on implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.牙槽嵴劈开术对种植体疗效的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Nov 20;23(1):894. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03643-2.
2
Autogenous Bone and Bioactive Glass around Implants Placed Simultaneously with Ridge Splitting for the Treatment of Horizontal Bony Defects: A Randomised Clinical Trial.种植体植入同期行牙槽嵴劈开术时使用自体骨和生物活性玻璃治疗水平骨缺损:一项随机临床试验
Int J Dent. 2021 Jul 28;2021:2457328. doi: 10.1155/2021/2457328. eCollection 2021.
3
Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Expansion with Split-Crest Technique Compared with Lateral Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic Review.
采用劈嵴技术的上颌牙槽嵴扩展与自体骨块移植的侧方嵴增高术的比较:一项系统评价
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2019 Dec 30;10(4):e2. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2019.10402. eCollection 2019 Oct-Dec.
4
The three-dimensional reconstruction of the jaw with "bone slat technique" in conjunction with third molar removal.采用“骨板技术”结合第三磨牙拔除术对颌骨进行三维重建。
Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2018 Mar 8;8(3):123-130. doi: 10.11138/ads/2017.8.3.123. eCollection 2017 Sep-Dec.
5
Mandibular bone regeneration after bone slat technique.骨板技术后的下颌骨再生
Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017 Jul 3;8(1):39-44. doi: 10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.039. eCollection 2017 Jan-Mar.