Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Parasit Vectors. 2013 May 4;6:137. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-137.
Mosquitoes that bite people outdoors can sustain malaria transmission even where effective indoor interventions such as bednets or indoor residual spraying are already widely used. Outdoor tools may therefore complement current indoor measures and improve control. We developed and evaluated a prototype mosquito control device, the 'Mosquito Landing Box' (MLB), which is baited with human odours and treated with mosquitocidal agents. The findings are used to explore technical options and challenges relevant to luring and killing outdoor-biting malaria vectors in endemic settings.
Field experiments were conducted in Tanzania to assess if wild host-seeking mosquitoes 1) visited the MLBs, 2) stayed long or left shortly after arrival at the device, 3) visited the devices at times when humans were also outdoors, and 4) could be killed by contaminants applied on the devices. Odours suctioned from volunteer-occupied tents were also evaluated as a potential low-cost bait, by comparing baited and unbaited MLBs.
There were significantly more Anopheles arabiensis, An. funestus, Culex and Mansonia mosquitoes visiting baited MLB than unbaited controls (P≤0.028). Increasing sampling frequency from every 120 min to 60 and 30 min led to an increase in vector catches of up to 3.6 fold (P≤0.002), indicating that many mosquitoes visited the device but left shortly afterwards. Outdoor host-seeking activity of malaria vectors peaked between 7:30 and 10:30 pm, and between 4:30 and 6:00 am, matching durations when locals were also outdoors. Maximum mortality of mosquitoes visiting MLBs sprayed or painted with formulations of candidate mosquitocidal agent (pirimiphos-methyl) was 51%. Odours from volunteer occupied tents attracted significantly more mosquitoes to MLBs than controls (P<0.001).
While odour-baited devices such as the MLBs clearly have potential against outdoor-biting mosquitoes in communities where LLINs are used, candidate contaminants must be those that are effective at ultra-low doses even after short contact periods, since important vector species such as An. arabiensis make only brief visits to such devices. Natural human odours suctioned from occupied dwellings could constitute affordable sources of attractants to supplement odour baits for the devices. The killing agents used should be environmentally safe, long lasting, and have different modes of action (other than pyrethroids as used on LLINs), to curb the risk of physiological insecticide resistance.
在已经广泛使用有效室内干预措施(如蚊帐或室内滞留喷洒)的情况下,户外叮咬人的蚊子仍能维持疟疾传播。因此,户外工具可能会补充当前的室内措施并改善控制效果。我们开发并评估了一种名为“蚊子降落盒”(MLB)的原型蚊子控制装置,该装置用人类气味和杀蚊剂诱饵。研究结果用于探索在流行地区诱捕和杀死户外叮咬疟疾媒介的相关技术选择和挑战。
在坦桑尼亚进行了现场实验,以评估野生宿主寻找的蚊子是否 1)访问 MLB,2)在到达装置后停留时间长或短,3)在人类也在户外时访问设备,以及 4)可以通过施加在设备上的污染物杀死。还评估了从志愿者居住的帐篷中抽吸的气味作为一种潜在的低成本诱饵,方法是比较有诱饵和无诱饵的 MLB。
与无诱饵对照相比,有诱饵的 MLB 吸引了更多的阿拉伯按蚊、冈比亚按蚊、库蚊和曼蚊(P≤0.028)。将采样频率从每 120 分钟增加到 60 分钟和 30 分钟,导致蚊子的捕获量增加了高达 3.6 倍(P≤0.002),表明许多蚊子访问了装置,但随后很快离开。疟疾媒介的户外宿主寻找活动在晚上 7:30 至 10:30 之间和凌晨 4:30 至 6:00 之间达到高峰,与当地人外出的时间相匹配。访问 MLB 的蚊子的最大死亡率为 51%,喷洒或涂有候选杀蚊剂(吡虫啉)制剂的 MLB。从志愿者居住的帐篷中抽吸的气味比对照物吸引了更多的蚊子到 MLB(P<0.001)。
虽然像 MLB 这样的气味诱饵装置对在使用 LLIN 的社区中的户外叮咬蚊子显然具有潜力,但候选污染物必须是在短接触时间后即使在超低剂量下也有效的物质,因为重要的媒介物种,如阿拉伯按蚊,只对这些装置进行短暂访问。从居住的住宅中抽吸的天然人类气味可以构成负担得起的引诱剂来源,以补充这些装置的气味诱饵。使用的杀生物剂应该是环境安全的、持久的,并且具有不同的作用模式(不同于在 LLIN 上使用的拟除虫菊酯),以遏制生理杀虫剂抗性的风险。