Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Sep;78(3):484-93. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.03.1328. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
The differential diagnosis between benign and malignant polyps of the gallbladder (GB) is often challenging.
To evaluate whether contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CEH-EUS) might be an accurate method for discriminating malignant GB polyps from benign polyps.
Observational study.
Tertiary care medical center.
Ninety-three patients with GB polyps larger than 10 mm in diameter that were detected by conventional EUS underwent CEH-EUS for evaluation of microvasculature.
CEH-EUS was performed using a radial echoendoscope and the extended pure harmonic detection mode.
The abilities of conventional EUS and CEH-EUS to diagnose malignant polyp were compared. Two blinded reviewers classified the perfusion images into 3 categories: diffuse enhancement, perfusion defect, or nonenhancement. The vessel images were categorized as having a regular spotty vessel, an irregular vessel, or no vessels.
An irregular vessel pattern determined by CEH-EUS aided in the diagnosis of malignant polyps with a sensitivity and specificity of 90.3% and 96.6%, respectively. The presence of perfusion defects, determined by CEH-EUS, was calculated to diagnose malignant polyps with a sensitivity and specificity of 90.3% and 94.9%, respectively. Based on the definitely determined diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity for CEH-EUS were 93.5% and 93.2% versus 90.0% and 91.1% for conventional EUS. In 8 cases, management changed after CEH-EUS.
A tertiary medical center with a limited number of patients.
The presence of irregular intratumoral vessels or perfusion defects seen on CEH-EUS may be sensitive and accurate predictors of malignant GB polyps. CEH-EUS offers slightly improved diagnostic accuracy compared with EUS.
胆囊(GB)良恶性息肉的鉴别诊断往往具有挑战性。
评估对比增强谐波超声内镜(CEH-EUS)是否可作为鉴别恶性 GB 息肉与良性息肉的准确方法。
观察性研究。
三级护理医疗中心。
93 例直径大于 10mm 的 GB 息肉患者,经常规 EUS 检测,行 CEH-EUS 评估微血管。
CEH-EUS 使用径向超声内镜和扩展纯谐波检测模式进行。
比较常规 EUS 和 CEH-EUS 诊断恶性息肉的能力。两名盲法审阅者将灌注图像分为 3 类:弥漫增强、灌注缺损或无增强。血管图像分为规则点状血管、不规则血管或无血管。
CEH-EUS 确定的不规则血管模式有助于诊断恶性息肉,其敏感性和特异性分别为 90.3%和 96.6%。CEH-EUS 确定的灌注缺损存在,诊断恶性息肉的敏感性和特异性分别为 90.3%和 94.9%。基于明确的诊断,CEH-EUS 的敏感性和特异性分别为 93.5%和 93.2%,而常规 EUS 分别为 90.0%和 91.1%。在 8 例中,CEH-EUS 后改变了治疗方案。
仅在一家有一定数量患者的三级医疗中心进行。
CEH-EUS 上观察到的不规则肿瘤内血管或灌注缺损可能是恶性 GB 息肉的敏感和准确预测因子。CEH-EUS 与 EUS 相比,提供了略高的诊断准确性。