University Hospitals KU Leuven, Abdominal Surgery, Leuven, Belgium.
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):655-62. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70126-8. Epub 2013 May 2.
Postoperative pancreatic fistula is the leading cause of death and morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, the best reconstruction method to reduce occurrence of fistula is debated. We did a multicentre, randomised superiority trial to compare the outcomes of different reconstructive techniques in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours.
Patients aged 18-85 years with confirmed or suspected neoplasms of the pancreas, distal bile duct, ampulla vateri, duodenum, or periampullary tumours were eligible for inclusion. An internet-based platform was used to randomly assign patients to either pancreaticojejunostomy or pancreaticogastrostomy as reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy, using permuted blocks with six patients per block. Within each centre the randomisation was stratified on the pancreatic duct diameter (≤3 mm vs >3 mm) measured at the time of surgery. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of clinical postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade B or C) as defined by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula. The study was not masked and analyses were done by intention to treat. Patient follow-up was closed 2 months after discharge from the hospital. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00830778.
Between June, 2009, and August, 2012, we randomly allocated 167 patients to receive pancreaticojejunostomy and 162 to receive pancreaticogastrostomy. 33 (19.8%) patients in the pancreaticojejunostomy group and 13 (8.0%) in the pancreaticogastrostomy group had clinical postoperative pancreatic fistula (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.38-6.17; p=0.002). The overall incidence of postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the groups (99 in the pancreaticojejunostomy group vs 100 in the pancreaticogastrostomy group), although more events in the pancreaticojejunostomy group were of grade ≥3a than in the pancreaticogastrostomy group (39 vs 35).
In patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head or periampullary tumours, pancreaticogastrostomy is more efficient than pancreaticojejunostomy in reducing the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula.
Funding Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices, Belgium.
胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘是导致死亡和发病的主要原因。然而,减少瘘管发生的最佳重建方法仍存在争议。我们进行了一项多中心、随机优势试验,以比较不同重建技术在胰头或壶腹周围肿瘤行胰十二指肠切除术后患者中的结果。
年龄在 18-85 岁之间、经证实或疑似胰腺、远端胆管、 Vater 壶腹、十二指肠或壶腹周围肿瘤的患者有资格入组。使用基于互联网的平台,采用区组随机化方法,每个区组包含 6 例患者,将患者随机分配至胰肠吻合或胰胃吻合术作为胰十二指肠切除术后的重建方法。在每个中心内,根据术中测量的胰管直径(≤3mm 与>3mm)进行分层随机化。主要终点为术后临床胰瘘(国际胰腺瘘研究组定义为 B 级或 C 级)的发生情况。该研究未设盲,分析采用意向治疗。患者随访在出院后 2 个月结束。本研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT00830778。
2009 年 6 月至 2012 年 8 月,我们随机分配 167 例患者接受胰肠吻合术,162 例患者接受胰胃吻合术。在胰肠吻合术组中有 33 例(19.8%)患者和胰胃吻合术组中有 13 例(8.0%)患者发生术后临床胰瘘(OR 2.86,95%CI 1.38-6.17;p=0.002)。两组术后并发症的总体发生率无显著差异(胰肠吻合术组 99 例,胰胃吻合术组 100 例),但胰肠吻合术组≥3a 级事件多于胰胃吻合术组(39 例比 35 例)。
在因胰腺头部或壶腹周围肿瘤而行胰十二指肠切除术的患者中,与胰肠吻合术相比,胰胃吻合术可更有效地降低术后胰瘘的发生率。
比利时强生医疗器材公司资助。