Suppr超能文献

中国的儿童性虐待:27项研究的荟萃分析

Child sexual abuse in China: a meta-analysis of 27 studies.

作者信息

Ji Kai, Finkelhor David, Dunne Michael

机构信息

University of New Hampshire, 126 Horton Social Science Center, Durham, NH 03824, USA.

出版信息

Child Abuse Negl. 2013 Sep;37(9):613-22. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.03.008. Epub 2013 May 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether Chinese studies of child sexual abuse (CSA) in the general population show lower prevalence rates than other international studies, and whether certain features of these studies may help to account for variation in estimates.

METHODS

A meta-analysis and meta-regression were conducted on 27 studies found in the English and Chinese language peer reviewed journals that involved general populations of students or residents, estimated CSA prior to age 18, and specified rates for males or females individually.

RESULTS

Estimates for Chinese females were lower than the international composites. For total CSA for females, the Chinese pooled estimate was 15.3% (95% CI=12.6-18.0) based on the meta-analysis of 24 studies, lower than the international estimate (Stoltenborgh, van IJzendoorn, Euser, & Bakermans-Kranenburg, 2011) but not significantly. For contact CSA for females, the pooled estimate was 9.5% (95% CI=7.5-11.5), based on 16 studies, significantly lower than the international prevalence. For penetrative CSA for females, the pooled estimate was 1% (95% CI=0.7-1.3), based on 15 studies, significantly lower than the international estimate of 15.1%. Chinese men reported significantly less penetrative CSA but significantly more total CSA than international estimates; while contact CSA reported by Chinese and international males appeared to be roughly equivalent. Chinese CSA prevalence estimates were lower in studies from urban areas and non-mainland areas (Hong Kong and Taiwan), and in surveys with larger and probability samples, multiple sites, face-to-face interview method and when using less widely used instruments.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings to date justify further research into possible cultural and sociological reasons for lower risk of contact and penetrative sexual abuse of girls and less penetrative abuse of boys in China. Future research should examine sociological explanations, including patterns of supervision, sexual socialization and attitudes related to male sexual prowess.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The findings suggest that future general population studies in China should use well validated instruments, avoid face-to-face interview formats and be careful to maintain methodological standards when sampling large populations over multiple sites.

摘要

目的

探讨中国普通人群中儿童性虐待(CSA)研究的患病率是否低于其他国际研究,以及这些研究的某些特征是否有助于解释估计值的差异。

方法

对英文和中文同行评审期刊中找到的27项研究进行荟萃分析和荟萃回归,这些研究涉及学生或居民的普通人群,估计18岁之前的CSA情况,并分别列出男性或女性的患病率。

结果

中国女性的估计患病率低于国际综合数据。对于女性的总体CSA,基于对24项研究的荟萃分析,中国的合并估计患病率为15.3%(95%置信区间=12.6 - 18.0),低于国际估计值(Stoltenborgh、van IJzendoorn、Euser和Bakermans-Kranenburg,2011年),但差异不显著。对于女性的接触性CSA,基于16项研究的合并估计患病率为9.5%(95%置信区间=7.5 - 11.5),显著低于国际患病率。对于女性的插入性CSA,基于15项研究的合并估计患病率为1%(95%置信区间=0.7 - 1.3),显著低于国际估计值15.1%。中国男性报告的插入性CSA显著少于国际估计值,但总体CSA显著多于国际估计值;而中国和国际男性报告的接触性CSA似乎大致相当。在中国城市地区和非大陆地区(香港和台湾)的研究中,以及在样本量更大、采用概率抽样、多地点、面对面访谈方法以及使用不太常用工具的调查中,中国CSA患病率估计值较低。

结论

迄今为止的研究结果证明有必要进一步研究中国女孩遭受接触性和插入性性虐待风险较低以及男孩遭受插入性虐待较少的可能文化和社会学原因。未来的研究应探讨社会学解释,包括监管模式、性社会化以及与男性性能力相关的态度。

实践意义

研究结果表明,中国未来的普通人群研究应使用经过充分验证的工具,避免采用面对面访谈形式,并在对多个地点的大量人群进行抽样时注意保持方法学标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验