Suppr超能文献

基于消融线上起搏捕获损失指导肺静脉隔离的获益:一项前瞻性的 2 中心随机试验结果。

Benefit of pulmonary vein isolation guided by loss of pace capture on the ablation line: results from a prospective 2-center randomized trial.

机构信息

Department for Cardiac Electrophysiology, University Heart Center, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jul 2;62(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.059. Epub 2013 May 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to determine if an additional procedural endpoint of unexcitability (UE) to pacing along the ablation line reduces recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial tachycardia (AT) after radiofrequency catheter ablation.

BACKGROUND

AF/AT recurrence is common after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

METHODS

We included 102 patients from 2 centers (age 63 ± 10 years; 33 women; left atrium 38 ± 7 mm; left ventricular ejection fraction 61 ± 6%) with symptomatic paroxysmal AF. A 3-dimensional mapping system and circumferential mapping catheter were used in all patients for PVI. In group 1 (n = 50), the procedural endpoint was bidirectional block across the ablation line. In group 2 (n = 52), additional UE to bipolar pacing at an output of 10 mA and 2-ms pulse width was required. The primary endpoint was freedom from any AF/AT (>30 s) after discontinuation of antiarrhythmic drugs.

RESULTS

Procedural endpoints were successfully achieved in all patients. Procedure duration was significantly longer in group 2 (185 ± 58 min vs. 139 ± 57 min; p < 0.001); however, fluoroscopy times were not different (23 ± 9 min vs. 23 ± 9 min; p = 0.49). After a follow-up of 12 months in all patients, 26 patients (52%) in group 1 versus 43 (82.7%) in group 2 were free from any AF/AT (p = 0.001) after a single procedure. No major complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of pacing to ensure UE along the PVI line markedly improved near-term single-procedure success, compared with demonstration of bidirectional block alone. This additional endpoint significantly improved patient outcomes after PVI. (Unexcitability Along the Ablation as an Endpoint for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation; NCT01724437).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定消融线旁的不应激(UE)作为附加程序终点是否可以降低射频导管消融后心房颤动(AF)或心房扑动(AT)的复发率。

背景

肺静脉隔离(PVI)后 AF/AT 复发较为常见。

方法

我们纳入了来自 2 个中心的 102 名患者(年龄 63±10 岁;33 名女性;左心房 38±7mm;左心室射血分数 61±6%),这些患者患有有症状的阵发性 AF。所有患者均使用三维标测系统和环状标测导管进行 PVI。在第 1 组(n=50)中,程序终点为消融线的双向阻滞。在第 2 组(n=52)中,需要在双极起搏时施加 10mA 的输出和 2ms 的脉冲宽度,以达到 UE。主要终点为停用抗心律失常药物后无任何 AF/AT(>30s)。

结果

所有患者均成功达到了程序终点。第 2 组的手术时间明显长于第 1 组(185±58min 比 139±57min;p<0.001);然而,透视时间无差异(23±9min 比 23±9min;p=0.49)。所有患者随访 12 个月后,第 1 组有 26 名患者(52%),第 2 组有 43 名患者(82.7%)在单次手术后无任何 AF/AT(p=0.001)。无重大并发症发生。

结论

与单独显示双向阻滞相比,在 PVI 线上使用起搏确保 UE 可显著提高单次手术的近期成功率。这一附加终点显著改善了 PVI 后的患者预后。(UE 作为心房颤动消融的终点;NCT01724437)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验