Suppr超能文献

双排和单排缝线锚钉修复手术治疗止点性跟腱炎的生物力学特性。

Biomechanical properties of double- and single-row suture anchor repair for surgical treatment of insertional Achilles tendinopathy.

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Trauma Center Murnau, Murnau, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1642-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546513487061. Epub 2013 May 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Because of intratendinous ossifications, retrocalcaneal bursitis, or intratendinous necrosis commonly found in insertional tendinosis, it is often necessary to detach the tendon partially or entirely from its tendon-to-bone junction.

HYPOTHESIS

Double-row repair for insertional Achilles tendinopathy will generate an increased contact area and demonstrate higher biomechanical stability.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Eighteen cadaver Achilles tendons were split longitudinally and detached, exposing the calcaneus; an ostectomy was performed and the tendon was reattached to the calcaneus in 1 of 2 ways: 2 suture anchors (single row) or a 4-anchor (double row) construct. Footprint area measurements over time, displacement after cyclic loading (2000 cycles), and final load to failure were measured.

RESULTS

The double-row refixation technique was statistically superior to the single-row technique in footprint area measurement initially and 5 minutes after repair (P = .009 and P = .01, respectively) but not after 24 hours (P = .713). The double-row construct demonstrated significantly improved measures for peak load (433.9 ± 84.3 N vs 212.0 ± 49.7 N; P = .042), load at yield (354.7 ± 106.2 N vs 198.7 ± 39.5 N; P = .01), and slope (51.8 ± 9.9 N/mm vs 66.7 ± 16.2 N/mm; P = .021). Cyclic loading did not demonstrate significant differences between the 2 constructs.

CONCLUSION

Double-row construct for reinsertion of a completely detached Achilles tendon using proximal and distal rows resulted in significantly larger contact area initially and 5 minutes after repair and led to significantly higher peak load to failure on destructive testing.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In treatment for insertional Achilles tendinosis, the tendon often has to be detached and anatomically reattached to its insertion at the calcaneus. To our knowledge there is a lack of biomechanical studies supporting either a number or a pattern of suture anchor fixation. Because the stresses going across the insertion site of the Achilles tendon are significant during rehabilitation and weightbearing activities, it is imperative to have a strong construct that allows satisfactory healing during the early postoperative process.

摘要

背景

由于插入性跟腱病中常见的腱内骨化、跟腱囊炎或腱内坏死,通常需要将肌腱部分或全部从其肌腱-骨连接处分离。

假设

对于插入性跟腱病,双排修复将产生更大的接触面积,并表现出更高的生物力学稳定性。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。

方法

18 个尸体跟腱被纵向劈开并分离,暴露跟骨;进行跟骨切除术,将肌腱以 2 种方式重新附着在跟骨上:2 个缝线锚钉(单排)或 4 个锚钉(双排)结构。测量随时间变化的足迹面积、循环加载后的位移(2000 次循环)和最终失效载荷。

结果

双排固定技术在初始时和修复后 5 分钟时的足迹面积测量值均明显优于单排技术(P=0.009 和 P=0.01),但在 24 小时后(P=0.713)无显著差异。双排结构在峰值载荷(433.9±84.3N 与 212.0±49.7N;P=0.042)、屈服载荷(354.7±106.2N 与 198.7±39.5N;P=0.01)和斜率(51.8±9.9N/mm 与 66.7±16.2N/mm;P=0.021)方面均有显著改善。循环加载在两种结构之间没有显著差异。

结论

使用近端和远端排重新插入完全分离的跟腱的双排结构,在初始时和修复后 5 分钟时产生的接触面积明显更大,在破坏性试验中导致峰值失效载荷显著增加。

临床意义

在治疗插入性跟腱病时,通常需要将肌腱分离并解剖性地重新附着在跟骨的附着处。据我们所知,缺乏支持缝线锚钉固定数量或模式的生物力学研究。由于在康复和负重活动过程中,穿过跟腱附着处的应力很大,因此必须有一个坚固的结构,以便在术后早期恢复过程中获得满意的愈合。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验