Suppr超能文献

开放性腹部创伤患者一期腹部闭合失败的预测因素。

Predictors of failed primary abdominal closure in the trauma patient with an open abdomen.

作者信息

Beale Evan W, Janis Jeffrey E, Minei Joseph P, Elliott Alan C, Phelan Herb A

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Division of Burns/Trauma/Critical Care, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas TX 75390-9132, USA.

出版信息

South Med J. 2013 May;106(5):327-31. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31829243ed.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We sought to characterize risk factors for failed closure after damage-control laparotomy and to examine the impact of two broad categories of open abdomen-management technique on rates of fascial approximation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed (January 2006-December 2008) all trauma patients with an open abdomen after damage-control laparotomy. Patients with definitive abdominal closure before discharge were classified as successful closure (SC) and those discharged with a planned ventral hernia were classified as failed closure (FC). Univariate stepwise logistical analyses were conducted to identify covariates related to resuscitation volumes and injury severity that were associated with FC. Surgical techniques were dichotomized as fascial based or vacuum based and compared with chi square.

RESULTS

Sixty-two subjects met final eligibility (SC 44, FC 18). SC and FC were similar, with the exception of, respectively, initial base excess (-8.0 ± 4.2 vs -11.4 ± 4.9; P = 0.009), injury severity score (ISS; 29.0 ± 15.2 vs 20.6 ± 12.1; P = 0.04), and frequency of penetrating injury (47.7% vs 77.8%; P = 0.03). Stepwise regression showed significant associations between failed closure and increasing Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (odds ratio [OR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.11), worsening base excess on arrival (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.93), and lower ISS (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-1.00). Fascial-based versus vacuum-based management techniques had no effect on closure rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Volume of blood transfused, crystalloid given, and open abdomen management technique were not related to closure rates; however, worsened base excess on arrival, penetrating trauma, higher Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index, and a lower ISS were associated with FC. The latter was true despite an association also being found between FC and lower ISS scores, reflecting the propensity of ISS to underestimate injury burden after penetrating injury.

摘要

背景

我们试图确定损伤控制剖腹术后关闭失败的危险因素,并研究两大类开放性腹部管理技术对筋膜缝合率的影响。

方法

我们回顾性分析了(2006年1月至2008年12月)所有损伤控制剖腹术后有开放性腹部的创伤患者。出院前进行确定性腹部关闭的患者被分类为成功关闭(SC),而计划有腹侧疝出院的患者被分类为关闭失败(FC)。进行单变量逐步逻辑分析以确定与复苏量和损伤严重程度相关的协变量,这些协变量与FC相关。手术技术分为基于筋膜的或基于负压的,并进行卡方比较。

结果

62名受试者符合最终入选标准(SC 44例,FC 18例)。SC组和FC组相似,分别在初始碱剩余(-8.0±4.2对-11.4±4.9;P = 0.009)、损伤严重程度评分(ISS;29.0±15.2对20.6±12.1;P = 0.04)和穿透伤频率(47.7%对77.8%;P = 0.03)方面存在差异。逐步回归显示关闭失败与穿透性腹部创伤指数增加(比值比[OR] 1.06,95%置信区间[CI] 1.01 - 1.11)、入院时碱剩余恶化(OR 0.79,95% CI 0.66 - 0.93)和较低的ISS(OR 0.94,95% CI 0.89 - 1.00)之间存在显著关联。基于筋膜的与基于负压的管理技术对关闭率没有影响。

结论

输血量、晶体液输入量和开放性腹部管理技术与关闭率无关;然而,入院时碱剩余恶化、穿透性创伤、较高的穿透性腹部创伤指数和较低的ISS与FC相关。尽管在FC与较低的ISS评分之间也发现了关联,但后者仍然成立,这反映了ISS在低估穿透伤后损伤负担方面的倾向。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验