Al-Hashimi Sara, Zaman Mahvash, Waterworth Paul, Bilal Haris
School of Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Aug;17(2):392-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt184. Epub 2013 May 3.
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: Does the use of thiopental provide added cerebral protection during deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA)? Altogether, more than 62 papers were found using the reported search, of which 7 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. Four of the seven papers used thiopental alongside other neuroprotective methods and agents. The methods included the use of ice packs to the head and core systemic hypothermia. Agents used alongside thiopental included nicardipine and mannitol. Thiopental was found to have the ability to lower oxygen consumption, where oxygen consumption was measured using the phosphocreatinine and adenosine triphosphate ratio. The neuroprotective effect of thiopental was evaluated by assessing the electrical activity of the brain during circulatory arrest, by which it was shown to be advantageous. However, other trials suggested that adding thiopental during circulatory arrest did not provide any extra protection to the brain. The timing of thiopental administration is of importance in order to gain positive outcomes, as it's ability to lower the cerebral energy state may result in unfavourable results if added before hypothermic circulatory arrest, where this may lead to an ischaemic event. We conclude that the use of thiopental during deep hypothermic circulatory arrest is beneficial, but if administered too early, it may replete the cerebral energy state before arrest and prove to be detrimental.
根据结构化方案撰写了一篇心脏外科领域的最佳证据主题文章。所探讨的问题是:在深度低温循环停搏(DHCA)期间使用硫喷妥钠是否能提供额外的脑保护作用?通过所报道的检索方式,总共找到了62多篇论文,其中7篇代表了回答该临床问题的最佳证据。现将这些论文的作者、期刊、出版日期、国家、所研究的患者群体、研究类型、相关结局和结果制成表格。7篇论文中有4篇在使用其他神经保护方法和药物的同时使用了硫喷妥钠。这些方法包括对头使用冰袋和进行全身低温。与硫喷妥钠一起使用的药物包括尼卡地平甘露醇。发现硫喷妥钠有降低氧消耗的能力,氧消耗是通过磷酸肌酸和三磷酸腺苷的比率来测量的。硫喷妥钠的神经保护作用是通过评估循环停搏期间大脑的电活动来评估的,结果表明其具有优势。然而,其他试验表明,在循环停搏期间添加硫喷妥钠并不能为大脑提供任何额外的保护。硫喷妥钠给药的时机对于获得积极结果很重要,因为其降低脑能量状态的能力如果在低温循环停搏之前添加可能会导致不利结果,这可能会引发缺血事件。我们得出结论,在深度低温循环停搏期间使用硫喷妥钠是有益的,但如果给药过早,它可能会在停搏前补充脑能量状态,结果证明是有害的。