Pavlish Carol, Brown-Saltzman Katherine, Fine Alyssa, Jakel Patricia
University of California Los Angeles School of Nursing, 700 Tiverton Avenue, Factor 4-238, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA,
HEC Forum. 2013 Sep;25(3):269-83. doi: 10.1007/s10730-013-9213-5.
This manuscript proposes a proactive framework for preventing or mitigating disruptive ethical conflicts that often result from delayed or avoided conversations about the ethics of care. Four components of the framework are explained and illustrated with evidenced-based actions. Clinical implications of adopting a prevention-based, system-wide ethics framework are discussed. While some aspects of ethically-difficult situations are unique, system patterns allow some issues to occur repeatedly--often with lingering effects such as healthcare providers' disengagement and moral distress (McAndrew et al. Journal of Trauma Nursing 18(4):221-230, 2011), compromised inter-professional relationships (Rosenstein and O'Daniel American Journal of Nursing, 105(1):54-64, 2005), weakened ethical climates (Pauly et al. HEC Forum 24:1-11, 2012), and patient safety concerns (Cimiotti et al. American Journal of Infection Control 40:486-490, 2012). This work offers healthcare providers and clinical ethicists a framework for developing a comprehensive set of proactive, ethics-specific, and evidence-based strategies for mitigating ethical conflicts. Furthermore, the framework aims to encourage innovative research and novel ways of collaborating to reduce such conflicts and the moral distress that often results.
本手稿提出了一个积极主动的框架,用于预防或缓解因护理伦理方面的对话延迟或回避而经常引发的破坏性伦理冲突。该框架的四个组成部分通过循证行动进行了解释和说明。讨论了采用基于预防的全系统伦理框架的临床意义。虽然伦理困境的某些方面是独特的,但系统模式会使一些问题反复出现——往往会产生长期影响,如医疗服务提供者的脱离和道德困扰(麦克安德鲁等人,《创伤护理杂志》18(4):221 - 230,2011年)、跨专业关系受损(罗森斯坦和奥丹尼尔,《美国护理杂志》,105(1):54 - 64,2005年)、伦理氛围削弱(保利等人,《HEC论坛》24:1 - 11,2012年)以及患者安全问题(西米奥蒂等人,《美国感染控制杂志》40:486 - 490,2012年)。这项工作为医疗服务提供者和临床伦理学家提供了一个框架,用于制定一套全面的、积极主动的、针对伦理问题的循证策略,以缓解伦理冲突。此外,该框架旨在鼓励创新研究和新颖的合作方式,以减少此类冲突以及经常由此产生的道德困扰。