• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

做出决策:一个积极主动的伦理框架。

Making the call: a proactive ethics framework.

作者信息

Pavlish Carol, Brown-Saltzman Katherine, Fine Alyssa, Jakel Patricia

机构信息

University of California Los Angeles School of Nursing, 700 Tiverton Avenue, Factor 4-238, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA,

出版信息

HEC Forum. 2013 Sep;25(3):269-83. doi: 10.1007/s10730-013-9213-5.

DOI:10.1007/s10730-013-9213-5
PMID:23644780
Abstract

This manuscript proposes a proactive framework for preventing or mitigating disruptive ethical conflicts that often result from delayed or avoided conversations about the ethics of care. Four components of the framework are explained and illustrated with evidenced-based actions. Clinical implications of adopting a prevention-based, system-wide ethics framework are discussed. While some aspects of ethically-difficult situations are unique, system patterns allow some issues to occur repeatedly--often with lingering effects such as healthcare providers' disengagement and moral distress (McAndrew et al. Journal of Trauma Nursing 18(4):221-230, 2011), compromised inter-professional relationships (Rosenstein and O'Daniel American Journal of Nursing, 105(1):54-64, 2005), weakened ethical climates (Pauly et al. HEC Forum 24:1-11, 2012), and patient safety concerns (Cimiotti et al. American Journal of Infection Control 40:486-490, 2012). This work offers healthcare providers and clinical ethicists a framework for developing a comprehensive set of proactive, ethics-specific, and evidence-based strategies for mitigating ethical conflicts. Furthermore, the framework aims to encourage innovative research and novel ways of collaborating to reduce such conflicts and the moral distress that often results.

摘要

本手稿提出了一个积极主动的框架,用于预防或缓解因护理伦理方面的对话延迟或回避而经常引发的破坏性伦理冲突。该框架的四个组成部分通过循证行动进行了解释和说明。讨论了采用基于预防的全系统伦理框架的临床意义。虽然伦理困境的某些方面是独特的,但系统模式会使一些问题反复出现——往往会产生长期影响,如医疗服务提供者的脱离和道德困扰(麦克安德鲁等人,《创伤护理杂志》18(4):221 - 230,2011年)、跨专业关系受损(罗森斯坦和奥丹尼尔,《美国护理杂志》,105(1):54 - 64,2005年)、伦理氛围削弱(保利等人,《HEC论坛》24:1 - 11,2012年)以及患者安全问题(西米奥蒂等人,《美国感染控制杂志》40:486 - 490,2012年)。这项工作为医疗服务提供者和临床伦理学家提供了一个框架,用于制定一套全面的、积极主动的、针对伦理问题的循证策略,以缓解伦理冲突。此外,该框架旨在鼓励创新研究和新颖的合作方式,以减少此类冲突以及经常由此产生的道德困扰。

相似文献

1
Making the call: a proactive ethics framework.做出决策:一个积极主动的伦理框架。
HEC Forum. 2013 Sep;25(3):269-83. doi: 10.1007/s10730-013-9213-5.
2
Nursing priorities, actions, and regrets for ethical situations in clinical practice.临床实践中伦理情境的护理重点、行动和遗憾。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2011 Dec;43(4):385-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01422.x. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
3
Ethical quandaries posing as conflicts of interest.伦理困境伪装成利益冲突。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Jun;36(6):328-32. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.034710.
4
Living with conflicts-ethical dilemmas and moral distress in the health care system.在医疗系统中与冲突共存——伦理困境与道德困扰
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Mar;58(6):1075-84. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00279-x.
5
A culture of avoidance: voices from inside ethically difficult clinical situations.一种回避的文化:来自道德困境临床情境内部的声音。
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2015 Apr;19(2):159-65. doi: 10.1188/15.CJON.19-02AP.
6
Neglected ends: clinical ethics consultation and the prospects for closure.被忽视的结局:临床伦理咨询与解决的前景。
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(1):29-36. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.974770.
7
Political and interpersonal aspects of ethics consultation.伦理咨询的政治与人际因素
Theor Med. 1992 Mar;13(1):31-44. doi: 10.1007/BF00489218.
8
Ethics consultation as moral engagement.作为道德参与的伦理咨询
Bioethics. 1991 Jan;5(1):44-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1991.tb00143.x.
9
Doctors' and nurses' perceptions of ethical problems in end-of-life decisions.医生和护士对临终决策中伦理问题的看法。
J Adv Nurs. 2001 Mar;33(6):707-15. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01710.x.
10
What triggers requests for ethics consultations?是什么引发了伦理咨询请求?
J Med Ethics. 2001 Apr;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i24-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.suppl_1.i24.

引用本文的文献

1
When Healthcare Professionals Disagree: Finding the Right Balance.当医疗专业人员意见不一致时:找到正确的平衡。
Malays J Med Sci. 2024 Aug;31(4):223-227. doi: 10.21315/mjms2024.31.4.19. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
2
Pediatric Interprofessional ICU Ethics Rounds: A Single-Center Study.儿科跨专业 ICU 伦理查房:一项单中心研究。
Hosp Pediatr. 2021 Apr;11(4):411-416. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-001248. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
3
Proactive Ethical Design for Neuroengineering, Assistive and Rehabilitation Technologies: the Cybathlon Lesson.主动式神经工程学、辅助和康复技术的伦理设计:Cybathlon 的经验教训。

本文引用的文献

1
Nurses' responses to ethical challenges in oncology practice: an ethnographic study.护士对肿瘤学实践中伦理挑战的应对:一项人种志研究。
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2012 Dec;16(6):592-600. doi: 10.1188/12.CJON.592-600.
2
Nurse staffing, burnout, and health care-associated infection.护士人员配备、倦怠和与医疗保健相关的感染。
Am J Infect Control. 2012 Aug;40(6):486-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.02.029.
3
Consequences of clinical situations that cause critical care nurses to experience moral distress.导致重症监护护士经历道德困境的临床情况的后果。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Nov 14;14(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0325-z.
Nurs Ethics. 2012 Jul;19(4):479-87. doi: 10.1177/0969733011429342. Epub 2012 May 22.
4
Moral distress: tensions as springboards for action.道德困扰:将紧张局势作为行动的跳板。
HEC Forum. 2012 Mar;24(1):51-62. doi: 10.1007/s10730-012-9180-2.
5
Empirical research on moral distress: issues, challenges, and opportunities.道德困扰的实证研究:问题、挑战与机遇。
HEC Forum. 2012 Mar;24(1):39-49. doi: 10.1007/s10730-012-9177-x.
6
Framing the issues: moral distress in health care.阐述问题:医疗保健中的道德困扰
HEC Forum. 2012 Mar;24(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s10730-012-9176-y.
7
Moral distress and the contemporary plight of health professionals.道德困扰与医疗专业人员的当代困境。
HEC Forum. 2012 Mar;24(1):27-38. doi: 10.1007/s10730-012-9179-8.
8
Preventive ethics: addressing ethics quality gaps on a systems level.预防性伦理:在系统层面解决伦理质量差距问题。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012 Mar;38(3):103-11. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(12)38014-8.
9
Professional nursing burnout and irrational thinking: a replication study.专业护士职业倦怠与非理性思维:一项重复研究
J Nurses Staff Dev. 2012 Jan-Feb;28(1):2-8. doi: 10.1097/NND.0b013e318240a65a.
10
An educational intervention to increase "speaking-up" behaviors in nurses and improve patient safety.一项旨在增加护士“主动发声”行为并提高患者安全的教育干预措施。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2012 Apr-Jun;27(2):154-60. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0b013e318241d9ff.