Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 Apr;64(4):353-9. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.64.4.353. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
Intravenous lipid emulsion has been used to treat systemic toxicity of local anesthetics. The goals of this in vitro study were to determine the ability of two lipid emulsions (Intralipid® and Lipofundin® MCT/LCT) to reverse toxic dose local anesthetic-induced vasodilation in isolated rat aortas.
Isolated endothelium-denuded aortas were suspended for isometric tension recording. Vasodilation was induced by bupivacaine (3 × 10(-4) M), ropivacaine (10(-3) M), lidocaine (3 × 10(-3) M), or mepivacaine (7 × 10(-3) M) after precontraction with 60 mM KCl. Intralipid® and Lipofundin® MCT/LCT were then added to generate concentration-response curves. We also assessed vasoconstriction induced by 60 mM KCl, 60 mM KCl with 3 × 10(-4) M bupivacaine, and 60 mM KCl with 3 × 10(-4) M bupivacaine plus 1.39% lipid emulsion (Intralipid® or Lipofundin® MCT/LCT).
The two lipid emulsions reversed vasodilation induced by bupivacaine, ropivacaine, and lidocaine but had no effect on vasodilation induced by mepivacaine. Lipofundin® MCT/LCT was more effective than Intralipid® in reversing bupivacaine-induced vasodilation. The magnitude of lipid emulsion-mediated reversal of vasodilation induced by high-dose local anesthetics was as follows (from highest to lowest): 3 × 10(-4) M bupivacaine-induced vasodilation, 10(-3) M ropivacaine-induced vasodilation, and 3 × 10(-3) M lidocaine-induced vasodilation.
Lipofundin® MCT/LCT-mediated reversal of bupivacaine-induced vasodilation was greater than that of Intralipid®; however, the two lipid emulsions equally reversed vasodilation induced by ropivacaine and lidocaine. The magnitude of lipid emulsion-mediated reversal of vasodilation appears to be correlated with the lipid solubility of the local anesthetic.
静脉内脂肪乳剂已被用于治疗局部麻醉剂的全身毒性。本体外研究的目的是确定两种脂肪乳剂(Intralipid®和 Lipofundin®MCT/LCT)逆转分离大鼠主动脉中中毒剂量局部麻醉剂诱导的血管扩张的能力。
分离去内皮的主动脉用于等长张力记录。通过 60mM KCl 预收缩后,用布比卡因(3×10(-4)M)、罗哌卡因(10(-3)M)、利多卡因(3×10(-3)M)或甲哌卡因(7×10(-3)M)诱导血管扩张。然后加入 Intralipid®和 Lipofundin®MCT/LCT 以生成浓度反应曲线。我们还评估了 60mM KCl、60mM KCl 加 3×10(-4)M 布比卡因和 60mM KCl 加 3×10(-4)M 布比卡因加 1.39%脂肪乳剂(Intralipid®或 Lipofundin®MCT/LCT)诱导的血管收缩。
两种脂肪乳剂均逆转了布比卡因、罗哌卡因和利多卡因诱导的血管扩张,但对甲哌卡因诱导的血管扩张无影响。与 Intralipid®相比,Lipofundin®MCT/LCT 更有效地逆转布比卡因诱导的血管扩张。高剂量局部麻醉剂诱导的血管扩张的脂肪乳剂介导的逆转程度如下(从高到低):3×10(-4)M 布比卡因诱导的血管扩张、10(-3)M 罗哌卡因诱导的血管扩张和 3×10(-3)M 利多卡因诱导的血管扩张。
Lipofundin®MCT/LCT 介导的布比卡因诱导的血管扩张的逆转大于 Intralipid®;然而,两种脂肪乳剂均能逆转罗哌卡因和利多卡因诱导的血管扩张。脂肪乳剂介导的血管扩张逆转的程度似乎与局部麻醉剂的脂溶性相关。