Department of Psychiatry.
Department of Psychology.
Psychol Assess. 2013 Sep;25(3):780-795. doi: 10.1037/a0032542. Epub 2013 May 6.
Three decades of research demonstrate that individual differences in subjective response (SR) to acute alcohol effects predict heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems. However, the SR patterns conferring the greatest risk remain under debate. Morean and Corbin (2010) highlighted that extant SR measures commonly have limitations within the following areas: assessment of a comprehensive range of effects, assessment of effects over the complete course of a drinking episode, and/or psychometric validation. Furthermore, the consistent pairing of certain SR measures and theoretical models has made integration of findings difficult. To address these issues, we developed the Subjective Effects of Alcohol Scale (SEAS), a novel, psychometrically sound SR measure for use in alcohol administration studies. Pilot data ensured that the SEAS comprised a comprehensive range of effects that varied in terms of valence and arousal and were perceived as plausible effects of drinking. For validation purposes, the SEAS was included in a 2-site, placebo-controlled, alcohol administration study (N = 215). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses identified a 14-item, 4-factor model categorizing effects into affective quadrants (high/low arousal positive; high/low arousal negative). SEAS scores evidenced the following: (a) scalar measurement invariance by limb of the blood alcohol curve (BAC) and beverage condition; (b) good internal consistency; (c) convergence/divergence with extant SR measures, alcohol expectancies, and alcohol use; and (d) concurrent/incremental utility in accounting for alcohol-related outcomes, highlighting the novel high arousal negative and low arousal.
三十年来的研究表明,个体对急性酒精作用的主观反应(SR)差异预测了重度饮酒和与酒精相关的问题。然而,赋予最大风险的 SR 模式仍存在争议。Morean 和 Corbin(2010 年)强调,现有的 SR 测量方法通常在以下几个方面存在局限性:全面评估影响、评估整个饮酒过程中的影响,和/或心理测量验证。此外,某些 SR 测量方法和理论模型的一致配对使得难以整合研究结果。为了解决这些问题,我们开发了主观酒精效应量表(SEAS),这是一种新颖的、心理测量上可靠的 SR 测量方法,可用于酒精给药研究。初步数据确保了 SEAS 包括一系列广泛的影响,这些影响在效价和唤醒方面有所不同,并且被认为是饮酒的合理影响。为了验证目的,SEAS 被纳入了一项 2 个地点、安慰剂对照的酒精给药研究(N=215)。探索性和验证性因素分析确定了一个 14 项、4 因素模型,将影响分为情感象限(高/低唤醒积极;高/低唤醒消极)。SEAS 得分表现出以下特征:(a)通过 BAC 和饮料条件的肢体的标量测量不变性;(b)良好的内部一致性;(c)与现有的 SR 测量方法、酒精期望和酒精使用的收敛/发散;以及(d)在解释与酒精相关的结果方面的同时/增量效用,突出了新颖的高唤醒负性和低唤醒负性。