• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知处理速度的全球发展趋势。

A global developmental trend in cognitive processing speed.

作者信息

Hale S

机构信息

Washington University, Department of Psychology, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899.

出版信息

Child Dev. 1990 Jun;61(3):653-63.

PMID:2364741
Abstract

Children respond more slowly than young adults on a variety of information-processing tasks. The global trend hypothesis posits that processing speed changes as a function of age, and that all component processes change at the same rate. A unique prediction of this hypothesis is that the overall response latencies of children of a particular age should be predictable from the latencies of young adults performing the same tasks--without regard to the specific componential makeup of the task. The current effort tested this prediction by examining the performance of 4 age groups (10-, 12-, 15-, and 19-year-olds) on 4 different tasks (choice reaction time, letter matching, mental rotation, and abstract matching). An analysis that simultaneously examined performance on all 4 tasks provided strong support for the global trend hypothesis. By plotting each child group's performance on all 4 tasks as a function of the young adult group's performance in the corresponding task conditions, precise linear functions were revealed: 10-year-olds were approximately 1.8 times slower than young adults on all tasks, and 12-year-olds were approximately 1.5 times slower, whereas 15-year-olds appeared to process information as fast as young adults.

摘要

在各种信息处理任务中,儿童的反应比年轻人更慢。整体趋势假说认为,处理速度会随着年龄的变化而变化,并且所有组成过程都以相同的速率变化。该假说的一个独特预测是,特定年龄儿童的总体反应潜伏期应该可以根据执行相同任务的年轻人的潜伏期来预测——而不考虑任务的具体组成结构。当前的研究通过考察4个年龄组(10岁、12岁、15岁和19岁)在4种不同任务(选择反应时、字母匹配、心理旋转和抽象匹配)上的表现来检验这一预测。一项同时考察所有4项任务表现的分析为整体趋势假说提供了有力支持。通过将每个儿童组在所有4项任务上的表现绘制为相应任务条件下年轻人组表现的函数,揭示了精确的线性函数:10岁儿童在所有任务上的速度比年轻人慢约1.8倍,12岁儿童慢约1.5倍,而15岁儿童处理信息的速度似乎与年轻人一样快。

相似文献

1
A global developmental trend in cognitive processing speed.认知处理速度的全球发展趋势。
Child Dev. 1990 Jun;61(3):653-63.
2
Age-related differences in reaction time task performance in young children.幼儿反应时任务表现中的年龄相关差异。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Feb;102(2):150-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Mar 24.
3
Children's performance in mental rotation tasks: orientation-free features flatten the slope.儿童在心理旋转任务中的表现:无方向特征使斜率变平缓。
Dev Sci. 2008 Sep;11(5):732-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00723.x.
4
Processing time decreases globally at an exponential rate during childhood and adolescence.在儿童期和青少年期,处理时间以指数速率在全球范围内减少。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1993 Oct;56(2):254-65. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1993.1034.
5
Processing speed in childhood and adolescence: longitudinal models for examining developmental change.儿童期和青少年期的处理速度:用于检验发育变化的纵向模型
Child Dev. 2007 Nov-Dec;78(6):1760-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01088.x.
6
Developmental trends in simple and selective inhibition of compatible and incompatible responses.简单及选择性抑制相容与不相容反应的发展趋势
J Exp Child Psychol. 2004 Mar;87(3):201-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2003.11.003.
7
Age differences in imagery abilities.意象能力的年龄差异。
Child Dev. 1990 Aug;61(4):995-1010.
8
The ability to activate and inhibit speeded responses: separate developmental trends.激活和抑制快速反应的能力:不同的发展趋势。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2000 Apr;75(4):263-90. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1999.2538.
9
Individual differences in infant visual attention: four-month-olds' discrimination and generalization of global and local stimulus properties.婴儿视觉注意力的个体差异:四个月大婴儿对整体和局部刺激属性的辨别与泛化
Child Dev. 1993 Aug;64(4):1191-203.
10
Global-local processing in preschool children.学龄前儿童的全局-局部加工
Child Dev. 1991 Dec;62(6):1258-75.

引用本文的文献

1
The Adaptation of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-5th Edition (WISC-V) for Indonesia: A Pilot Study.《韦氏儿童智力量表第五版(WISC-V)在印度尼西亚的适应性:一项试点研究》
J Intell. 2025 Jun 24;13(7):76. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13070076.
2
Motor network organization in healthy development and chronic tic disorders.健康发育和慢性抽动障碍中的运动网络组织
Brain Commun. 2025 Jun 30;7(4):fcaf260. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf260. eCollection 2025.
3
Children infer the behavioral contexts of unfamiliar foreign songs.儿童能够推断出不熟悉的外国歌曲的行为背景。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Mar;152(3):839-850. doi: 10.1037/xge0001289. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
4
Use of minor donors for living donor liver transplantation and associated ethical issues.使用未成年供体进行活体肝移植及相关伦理问题。
Korean J Transplant. 2021 Sep 30;35(3):161-167. doi: 10.4285/kjt.21.0015.
5
The developmental impact of sex chromosome trisomies on emerging executive functions in young children: Evidence from neurocognitive tests and daily life skills.性染色体三体对幼儿新兴执行功能的发育影响:来自神经认知测试和日常生活技能的证据。
Genes Brain Behav. 2022 Jul;21(6):e12811. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12811. Epub 2022 May 18.
6
Developmental Trajectories of Size Constancy as Implicitly Examined by Simple Reaction Times.通过简单反应时对大小恒常性发展轨迹的隐性考察
Vision (Basel). 2021 Oct 19;5(4):50. doi: 10.3390/vision5040050.
7
Speeding-up while growing-up: Synchronous functional development of motor and non-motor processes across childhood and adolescence.加速成长:儿童期和青春期运动和非运动过程的同步功能发展。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 15;16(9):e0255892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255892. eCollection 2021.
8
Implicit learning of non-verbal regularities by deaf children with cochlear implants: An investigation with a dynamic temporal prediction task.聋童人工耳蜗植入后对非言语规则的内隐学习:一项采用动态时间预测任务的研究。
PLoS One. 2021 May 12;16(5):e0251050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251050. eCollection 2021.
9
Computerized Symbol Digit Modalities Test in a Swiss Pediatric Cohort Part 1: Validation.瑞士儿科队列中的计算机化符号数字模态测试 第1部分:验证
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 22;12:631536. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631536. eCollection 2021.
10
Computerized Symbol Digit Modalities Test in a Swiss Pediatric Cohort - Part 2: Clinical Implementation.瑞士儿科队列中的计算机化符号数字模态测试 - 第2部分:临床应用
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 23;12:631535. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631535. eCollection 2021.