Suppr超能文献

髋膝关节置换的医疗服务成本与利用

Cost and utilization of healthcare services for hip and knee replacement.

机构信息

C-K Consulting Associates, LLC, St. Helena Island, SC, USA.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2013 Jul;16(7):888-96. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.802695. Epub 2013 May 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Describe resource utilization and costs for total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) for the 90 days before hospitalization for surgery, the hospital event, and the 90 and 360 days after hospitalization for surgery with emphasis on 90 days after hospitalization.

METHODS

A large insurance database was used to identify outpatient and summarized hospital resource use and payments (insurer perspective) for THR and TKR. A second large US database provided hospital details (charge description master level) of inpatient services, costs, and charges (hospital perspective) for a different sample of THR and TKR patients. Included patients were ≥45 years old, had no hospitalization record within 1 year before surgery, and THR length of stay (LOS) of 2-8 days or TKR LOS 2-6 days.

RESULTS

There were 22 618 THR and 50 686 TKR patients in the insurance database and 81 635 THR and 158 990 TKR in the hospital database. Average age was ∼66 years for THR and TKR patients. Median LOS was 4 days (both surgeries). Hospital costs (hospital perspective) were $17 588 in US dollars (USD) and $16 267 (USD) for THR and TKR, respectively. Reimbursement for hospital services (insurer perspective) were $22 967 (USD) and $21 583 (USD) for THR and TKR, respectively. In 90 days post-surgery, THR and TKR total payments were $3827 (USD) and $4237 (USD), respectively. Payments for the first 90 days post-surgery were 57.5% of the 360-day post-period for THR-related payments and 59.9% for TKR-related payments.

CONCLUSION

Payers considering use of episode-of-care payment models for THR and TKR may wish to concentrate efforts on the 90 days post-discharge.

LIMITATIONS

While this study used large samples of subjects, generalisability of the results may be limited since the samples were not randomized samples of THR and TKR patients. It is noteworthy that patients in the hospital sample are not the same as those in the insurer sample. Selection of hip-related and knee-related procedures and associated costs was based on qualitative review. Payers may use different billing codes or aggregate costs differently.

摘要

目的

描述全髋关节置换术(THR)和全膝关节置换术(TKR)住院前 90 天、住院期间和术后 90 天和 360 天的资源利用和成本,重点关注住院后 90 天。

方法

使用大型保险数据库确定 THR 和 TKR 的门诊和汇总医院资源利用和支付情况(保险公司视角)。第二个大型美国数据库提供了不同样本的 THR 和 TKR 患者的住院服务、成本和费用的医院详细信息(费用描述主级)。纳入的患者年龄≥45 岁,在手术前 1 年内无住院记录,THR 住院时间(LOS)为 2-8 天,TKR LOS 为 2-6 天。

结果

保险数据库中有 22618 例 THR 和 50686 例 TKR 患者,医院数据库中有 81635 例 THR 和 158990 例 TKR。THR 和 TKR 患者的平均年龄约为 66 岁。中位 LOS 为 4 天(两种手术)。医院成本(医院视角)分别为 17588 美元(美元)和 16267 美元(美元),用于 THR 和 TKR。医院服务的报销(保险公司视角)分别为 22967 美元(美元)和 21583 美元(美元),用于 THR 和 TKR。手术后 90 天,THR 和 TKR 的总支出分别为 3827 美元(美元)和 4237 美元(美元)。手术后 90 天的支出占 360 天的 57.5%,THR 相关支出占 59.9%,TKR 相关支出占 59.9%。

结论

考虑对 THR 和 TKR 使用病例支付模式的支付方可能希望将重点放在出院后 90 天。

局限性

尽管本研究使用了大量的受试者样本,但由于 THR 和 TKR 患者样本不是随机样本,结果的普遍性可能有限。值得注意的是,医院样本中的患者与保险公司样本中的患者不同。髋关节和膝关节相关程序及相关费用的选择基于定性审查。支付方可能使用不同的计费代码或汇总成本方式不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验