Dishion T J
Oregon Social Learning Center, Eugene 97401.
Child Dev. 1990 Jun;61(3):874-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02829.x.
The association between boys' peer relations, their antisocial behavior, academic skill deficit, and family ecology was examined with 2 cohorts of boys and their families (N = 206) who were interviewed, observed in the home, and assessed in school. Group comparisons revealed that rejected boys experienced poorer family management practices (i.e., monitoring and discipline practices), showed more family stress, were of lower socioeconomic status, and displayed more behavioral and academic problems than did their average peers. Correlational analyses provided similar results and showed good replication across the 2 cohorts. The hypothesis was tested that the effect of poor parent discipline on peer rejection was mediated by the boys' antisocial behavior and academic skill deficits. Structural equation analyses indicated that the mediated effect model provided a better fit to the data than did the direct effect model. The findings were discussed in relation to the need for longitudinally examining the role of parenting processes and child behavior in peer rejection at different points in development.
通过对两组男孩及其家庭(N = 206)进行访谈、家庭观察和学校评估,研究了男孩的同伴关系、反社会行为、学业技能缺陷与家庭生态之间的关联。组间比较显示,被拒绝的男孩经历了较差的家庭管理方式(即监督和纪律措施),表现出更多的家庭压力,社会经济地位较低,并且比他们的普通同伴表现出更多的行为和学业问题。相关分析得出了类似的结果,并且在两组中得到了很好的重复。对以下假设进行了检验:不良的父母管教对同伴拒绝的影响是由男孩的反社会行为和学业技能缺陷介导的。结构方程分析表明,中介效应模型比直接效应模型更能拟合数据。结合纵向研究育儿过程和儿童行为在不同发展阶段的同伴拒绝中的作用的必要性,对研究结果进行了讨论。