Hageman Michiel G J S, Guitton Thierry G, Ring David
J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Jun;38(6):1202-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.02.032. Epub 2013 May 4.
To address the factors that surgeons use to decide between 2 options for treatment when the evidence is inconclusive.
We tested the null hypothesis that the factors surgeons use do not vary by training, demographics, and practice. A total of 337 surgeons rated the importance of 7 factors when deciding between treatment and following the natural history of the disease and 12 factors when deciding between 2 operative treatments using a 5-point Likert scale between "very important" and "very unimportant."
According to the percentages of statements rated very important or somewhat important, the most popular factors influencing recommendations when evidence is inconclusive between treatment and following the natural course of the illness were "works in my hands," "familiarity with the treatment," and "what my mentor taught me." The most important factors when evidence shows no difference between 2 surgeries were "fewer complications," "quicker recovery," "burns fewer bridges," "works in my hands" and "familiarity with the procedure." Europeans rated "works in my hands" and "cheapest/most resourceful" of significantly greater importance and "what others are doing," "highest reimbursement," and "shorter procedure" of significantly lower importance than surgeons in the United States. Observers with fewer than 10 years in independent practice rated "what my mentor taught me," "what others are doing" and "highest reimbursement" of significantly lower importance compared to observers with 10 or more years in independent practice.
Surgeons deciding between 2 treatment options, when the evidence is inconclusive, fall back to factors that relate to their perspective and reflect their culture and circumstances, more so than factors related to the patient's perspective, although this may be different for younger surgeons.
Hand surgeons might benefit from consensus fallback preferences when evidence is inconclusive. It is possible that falling back to personal comfort makes us vulnerable to unhelpful commercial and societal influences.
探讨在证据不确凿时,外科医生在两种治疗方案之间做出决策所依据的因素。
我们检验了零假设,即外科医生所依据的因素不会因培训、人口统计学特征和执业情况而有所不同。共有337名外科医生使用从“非常重要”到“非常不重要”的5级李克特量表,对在决定是进行治疗还是任由疾病自然发展时7个因素的重要性,以及在决定两种手术治疗方案时12个因素的重要性进行了评分。
根据被评为非常重要或有些重要的陈述所占百分比,在治疗与任由疾病自然发展之间证据不确凿时,影响建议的最常见因素是“我做起来顺手”“熟悉该治疗方法”以及“我的导师教给我的”。当证据显示两种手术没有差异时,最重要的因素是“并发症更少”“恢复更快”“留有余地”“我做起来顺手”以及“熟悉该手术”。与美国外科医生相比,欧洲人认为“我做起来顺手”和“最便宜/资源消耗最少”的重要性显著更高,而“其他人的做法”“报销额度最高”和“手术时间更短”的重要性显著更低。独立执业年限少于10年的观察者认为,与独立执业年限为10年或更长时间的观察者相比,“我的导师教给我的”“其他人的做法”和“报销额度最高”的重要性显著更低。
在证据不确凿时,外科医生在两种治疗方案之间做出决策时,更多地依据与他们自身观点相关、反映其文化和环境的因素,而非与患者观点相关的因素,不过年轻外科医生可能有所不同。
当证据不确凿时,手外科医生或许能从达成共识的备用偏好中受益。依靠个人偏好可能会使我们容易受到无益的商业和社会影响。