Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road, Northeast Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013 Sep;101(3):255-69. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.03.023. Epub 2013 May 4.
To provide a systematic overview of the added value of novel circulating and genetic biomarkers in predicting type 2 diabetes (T2DM).
We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (January 2000 to September 2012) for studies that reported a measure of improvement in the performance of T2DM risk prediction models subsequent to adding novel biomarkers to traditional risk factors. We extracted data on study methods and metrics of incremental predictive value of novel biomarkers.
We included 34 publications from 30 studies. All studies reported a change in the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, which was modest, ranging from -0.004 to 0.1, with claims of statistically significant improvements in eleven studies. The net reclassification index was evaluated in 11 studies, and ranged from -2.2% to 10.2% after inclusion of genetic markers in six studies (statistically significant in two cases), and from -0.5% to 27.5% after inclusion of non-genetic markers in five studies (non-significant in two studies). The integrated discrimination index (0-2.04) was reported in eight studies, being statistically significant in five of these.
Currently known novel circulating and genetic biomarkers do not substantially improve T2DM risk prediction above and beyond the ability of traditional risk factors.
系统综述新型循环和遗传生物标志物在预测 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)方面的附加值。
我们检索了 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE(2000 年 1 月至 2012 年 9 月),以寻找报告在将新型生物标志物添加到传统危险因素后,T2DM 风险预测模型性能得到改善的研究。我们提取了关于研究方法和新型生物标志物增量预测价值指标的数据。
我们纳入了 30 项研究中的 34 篇文献。所有研究均报告了受试者工作特征曲线下面积的变化,幅度较小,范围在-0.004 至 0.1 之间,有 11 项研究声称具有统计学意义的改善。11 项研究评估了净重新分类指数,在 6 项研究中纳入遗传标记后,范围为-2.2%至 10.2%(其中 2 项具有统计学意义),在 5 项研究中纳入非遗传标记后,范围为-0.5%至 27.5%(其中 2 项无统计学意义)。8 项研究报告了综合判别指数(0-2.04),其中 5 项具有统计学意义。
目前已知的新型循环和遗传生物标志物并不能在传统危险因素之外显著改善 T2DM 的风险预测。