University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, USA.
Depress Anxiety. 2013 Jun;30(6):538-45. doi: 10.1002/da.22122. Epub 2013 May 3.
Depression and substance use disorders (SUDs) commonly co-occur, which presents diagnostic challenges in classifying independent major depressive disorder (MDD) versus substance-induced depressive disorder (SIDD). It remains unclear if distinct characteristics and/or patterns in temporal course distinguish MDD-SUD and SIDD to guide these decisions. Further, evidence suggests that a significant portion of individuals with SIDD are later reclassified as having independent MDD. Continued research to improve our understanding of differences between these two and changes in reclassification over time is necessary for diagnostic clarification and to guide clinical decisions when treating depression in the context of SUDs.
The current study compared individuals with MDD-SUD versus SIDD at baseline and examined reclassification of DSM-IV Axis I diagnoses over a 3-year follow up in a large, nationally representative epidemiological sample (n = 2,121).
Findings demonstrated that SIDD was extremely rare at both time points. At baseline, individuals with SIDD were more likely to be non-White, have less education, less likely to have insurance, less likely to have dysthymia or alcohol abuse, and more likely to have drug dependence compared to those with independent MDD. Of individuals with SIDD at Wave 1 who had a depressive episode between Waves 1 and 2, the overwhelming majority (>95%) had an independent MDD, not SIDD, episode. There were no significant group differences in the incidence of other mood disorders or SUDs at Wave 2.
Findings have important etiological and treatment implications for the classification and treatment of depression in the context of SUDs.
抑郁症和物质使用障碍(SUD)通常同时发生,这给独立的重性抑郁症(MDD)与物质诱发的抑郁障碍(SIDD)的分类带来了诊断挑战。目前尚不清楚是否存在不同的特征和/或时间进程模式可以区分 MDD-SUD 和 SIDD,以指导这些决策。此外,有证据表明,相当一部分 SIDD 患者后来被重新归类为独立的 MDD。为了明确诊断并指导 SUD 背景下治疗抑郁症时的临床决策,需要进一步研究以更好地了解这两种疾病之间的差异以及重新分类随时间的变化。
本研究在一个大型的全国代表性流行病学样本(n=2121)中,比较了 MDD-SUD 与 SIDD 患者在基线时的差异,并检查了 DSM-IV 轴 I 诊断在 3 年随访中的重新分类情况。
研究结果表明,在两个时间点 SIDD 都极为罕见。在基线时,与独立的 MDD 患者相比,SIDD 患者更有可能是非裔美国人、受教育程度较低、不太可能有保险、不太可能患有心境恶劣或酒精滥用,而更可能患有药物依赖。在第 1 波时患有 SIDD 的个体中,在第 1 波和第 2 波之间有抑郁发作的个体中,绝大多数(>95%)有独立的 MDD,而不是 SIDD,发作。在第 2 波时,两组在其他心境障碍或 SUD 的发生率上没有显著差异。
这些发现对 SUD 背景下的抑郁分类和治疗具有重要的病因学和治疗意义。