Suppr超能文献

粪便潜血检测筛查中假阳性和假阴性检测结果的危险因素。

Risk factors for false positive and for false negative test results in screening with fecal occult blood testing.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academical Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of research and development, NDDO Institute for Prevention and Early Diagnostic, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Cancer. 2013 Nov 15;133(10):2408-14. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28242. Epub 2013 Jun 25.

Abstract

Differences in the risk of a false negative or a false positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) across subgroups may affect optimal screening strategies. We evaluate whether subgroups are at increased risk of a false positive or a false negative FIT result, whether such variability in risk is related to differences in FIT sensitivity and specificity or to differences in prior CRC risk. Randomly selected, asymptomatic individuals were invited to undergo colonoscopy. Participants were asked to undergo one sample FIT and to complete a risk questionnaire. We identified patient characteristics associated with a false negative and false positive FIT results using logistic regression. We focused on statistically significant differences as well as on variables influencing the false positive or negative risk for which the odds ratio exceeded 1.25. Of the 1,426 screening participants, 1,112 (78%) completed FIT and the questionnaire; 101 (9.1%) had advanced neoplasia. 102 Individuals were FIT positive, 65 (64%) had a false negative FIT result and 66 (65%) a false positive FIT result. Participants at higher age and smokers had a significantly higher risk of a false negative FIT result. Males were at increased risk of a false positive result, so were smokers and regular NSAID users. FIT sensitivity was lower in females. Specificity was lower for males, smokers and regular NSAID users. FIT sensitivity was lower in women. FIT specificity was lower in males, smokers and regular NSAID users. Our results can be used for further evidence based individualization of screening strategies.

摘要

不同亚组粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)假阴性或假阳性的风险差异可能会影响最佳筛查策略。我们评估了亚组是否存在假阳性或假阴性 FIT 结果的风险增加,这种风险的可变性是否与 FIT 敏感性和特异性的差异有关,或者与先前 CRC 风险的差异有关。随机选择无症状个体进行结肠镜检查。要求参与者进行一次 FIT 检测并完成风险问卷。我们使用逻辑回归确定与 FIT 假阴性和假阳性结果相关的患者特征。我们关注具有统计学意义的差异以及影响假阳性或假阴性风险的变量,其优势比超过 1.25。在 1426 名筛查参与者中,1112 名(78%)完成了 FIT 和问卷;101 名(9.1%)患有晚期肿瘤。102 名个体 FIT 阳性,65 名(64%) FIT 假阴性,66 名(65%) FIT 假阳性。年龄较大和吸烟者的 FIT 假阴性结果风险显著增加。男性发生 FIT 假阳性的风险增加,吸烟者和经常使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)的人也是如此。女性的 FIT 敏感性较低。男性、吸烟者和经常使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)的人的 FIT 特异性较低。女性的 FIT 敏感性较低。男性、吸烟者和经常使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)的人的 FIT 特异性较低。我们的研究结果可用于进一步基于证据的个体化筛查策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验