• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌筛查中与粪便免疫化学检测结果假阳性相关的因素。

Factors associated with false fecal immunochemical test results in colorectal cancer screening.

作者信息

Wang Shu-Yuan, Dong Xue-Tao, Yuan Zhen, Jin Lei-Xin, Gao Wei-Feng, Han You-Kui, Ni Ke-Min, Liu Zhao-Ce, Wang Jun-Ying, Wei Xiao-Meng, Su Xiao-Min, Peng Xi, Zhang Chun-Ze

机构信息

School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin 300121, China.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Apr 15;17(4):101487. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i4.101487.

DOI:10.4251/wjgo.v17.i4.101487
PMID:40235883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11995355/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Certain subgroups are at an increased risk of false fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results; however, related studies are limited, and the available evidence is conflicting.

AIM

To evaluate factors associated with false-positive and false-negative FIT results.

METHODS

This retrospective study was based on the database of the Tianjin Colorectal Cancer Screening Program from 2012 to 2020. A total of 4129947 residents aged 40-74 years completed at least one FIT. Of these, 24890 asymptomatic participants who underwent colonoscopy examinations and completed lifestyle questionnaires were included in the analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify the factors associated with false FIT results.

RESULTS

Among the overall screening population, 88687 (2.15%) participants tested positive for FIT. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FIT for advanced neoplasms were 58.2%, 44.8%, 9.7%, and 91.3%, respectively. Older age, female sex, smoking, alcohol consumption, higher body mass index, and hemorrhoids were significantly associated with increased odds of false-positive and lower odds of false-negative FIT results. Moreover, features of high-grade dysplasia or villous for advanced adenoma and the presence of cancer were also associated with lower odds of false-negative results, while irregular exercise and diverticulum were associated with higher odds of false-positive results.

CONCLUSION

FIT results may be inaccurate in certain subgroups. Our results provide important evidence for further individualization of screening strategies.

摘要

背景

某些亚组人群出现粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)结果假阳性的风险增加;然而,相关研究有限,现有证据相互矛盾。

目的

评估与FIT假阳性和假阴性结果相关的因素。

方法

这项回顾性研究基于2012年至2020年天津市结直肠癌筛查项目的数据库。共有4129947名40 - 74岁的居民完成了至少一次FIT。其中,24890名无症状参与者接受了结肠镜检查并完成了生活方式问卷,纳入分析。采用多变量逻辑回归分析确定与FIT假结果相关的因素。

结果

在整个筛查人群中,88687名(2.15%)参与者FIT检测呈阳性。FIT对晚期肿瘤的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为58.2%、44.8%、9.7%和91.3%。年龄较大、女性、吸烟、饮酒、较高的体重指数和痔疮与FIT假阳性几率增加及假阴性几率降低显著相关。此外,高级别上皮内瘤变或晚期腺瘤的绒毛状特征以及癌症的存在也与假阴性结果几率降低相关,而不定期运动和憩室与假阳性结果几率增加相关。

结论

FIT结果在某些亚组中可能不准确。我们的结果为进一步个体化筛查策略提供了重要证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe8/11995355/cda99b7c19fa/101487-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe8/11995355/cda99b7c19fa/101487-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe8/11995355/cda99b7c19fa/101487-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors associated with false fecal immunochemical test results in colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查中与粪便免疫化学检测结果假阳性相关的因素。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Apr 15;17(4):101487. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i4.101487.
2
Factors associated with false-positive and false-negative fecal immunochemical test results for colorectal cancer screening.与结直肠癌筛查用粪便免疫化学检测结果假阳性和假阴性相关的因素。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):596-607. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
3
Risk Factors for False Fecal Immunochemical Test Results in Colorectal Cancer Screening.结直肠癌筛查中粪便免疫化学检测结果假阳性的危险因素
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017 Feb;51(2):151-159. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000588.
4
[Efficacy comparison among high risk factors questionnaire and Asia-Pacific colorectal screening score and their combinations with fecal immunochemical test in screening advanced colorectal tumor].[高危因素问卷与亚太地区结直肠癌筛查评分及其与粪便免疫化学检测联合应用在筛查进展期结直肠癌中的效果比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jul 25;25(7):612-620. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20211127-00478.
5
Predictive Modeling of Colonoscopic Findings in a Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.基于粪便免疫化学试验的结直肠癌筛查计划中结肠镜检查结果的预测模型。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Jul;67(7):2842-2848. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07160-6. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
6
Colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical testing: a community-based, cross-sectional study in average-risk individuals in Nigeria.粪便免疫化学检测在尼日利亚普通风险人群中的结直肠癌筛查:一项基于社区的横断面研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Jul;10(7):e1012-e1022. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00121-8.
7
Participant-Related Risk Factors for False-Positive and False-Negative Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.参与者相关的粪便免疫化学检测在结直肠癌筛查中的假阳性和假阴性的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec;113(12):1778-1787. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0212-7. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
8
Risk factors for false positive and for false negative test results in screening with fecal occult blood testing.粪便潜血检测筛查中假阳性和假阴性检测结果的危险因素。
Int J Cancer. 2013 Nov 15;133(10):2408-14. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28242. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
9
Fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: an evidence-based analysis.用于结直肠癌筛查的粪便潜血试验:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(10):1-40. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
10
[Participation rate and detection of colorectal neoplasms based on multi-round fecal immunochemical testing for colorectal cancer screening in the Chinese population].[基于多轮粪便免疫化学检测的中国人群结直肠癌筛查中结直肠肿瘤的参与率及检测情况]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2023 Dec 23;45(12):1041-1050. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20230221-00073.

本文引用的文献

1
Stool and blood biomarkers for colorectal cancer management: an update on screening and disease monitoring.粪便和血液生物标志物在结直肠癌管理中的应用:筛查和疾病监测的最新进展。
Mol Cancer. 2024 Nov 19;23(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12943-024-02174-w.
2
Utilization of colorectal cancer screening tests: a systematic review and time trend analysis of nationally representative data.结直肠癌筛查测试的应用:基于全国代表性数据的系统评价和时间趋势分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Aug 21;75:102783. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102783. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Long-term effects of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: 21-year follow-up of the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening randomised controlled trial.
单次乙状结肠镜筛查对结直肠癌发病率和死亡率的长期影响:英国乙状结肠镜筛查随机对照试验 21 年随访结果。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Sep;9(9):811-824. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00190-0. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
4
Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Sensitivity; A Five Year Audit.粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)的敏感性:一项为期五年的审计
Br J Biomed Sci. 2024 May 29;81:12862. doi: 10.3389/bjbs.2024.12862. eCollection 2024.
5
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Risk Stratification for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Post-Polypectomy Surveillance: Expert Review.AGA 临床实践更新:结直肠癌筛查和息肉切除术后监测的风险分层:专家综述。
Gastroenterology. 2023 Nov;165(5):1280-1291. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.06.033. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
6
The accuracy of the FIT in detecting advanced neoplasm is highest in young people aged 40 to 49 years: an analysis based on sex and age.基于性别和年龄的分析显示,在 40 至 49 岁的年轻人中,粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)检测晚期肿瘤的准确性最高。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jun 26;38(1):178. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04470-1.
7
The comparison of risk factors for colorectal neoplasms at different anatomical sites.不同解剖部位结直肠肿瘤发病危险因素的比较。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jan 31;38(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04296-3.
8
Colorectal Cancer Screening With High Risk-Factor Questionnaire and Fecal Immunochemical Tests Among 5, 947, 986 Asymptomatic Population: A Population-Based Study.基于5947986名无症状人群的高风险因素问卷和粪便免疫化学检测进行结直肠癌筛查:一项基于人群的研究。
Front Oncol. 2022 May 30;12:893183. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.893183. eCollection 2022.
9
Role of demographics in noninvasive testing for colorectal cancer screening: do targeted cut-off values improve detection?人口统计学在结直肠癌筛查非侵入性检测中的作用:靶向临界值能否提高检测率?
Minerva Gastroenterol (Torino). 2023 Dec;69(4):459-469. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5985.22.03124-2. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
10
Factors associated with positive predictive value of preliminary screening in a two-step screening strategy for colorectal neoplasms in China.中国结直肠肿瘤两步筛查策略中初筛阳性预测值的相关因素。
Discov Oncol. 2022 Jan 8;13(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s12672-022-00463-8.