Suppr超能文献

水凝胶系统中细胞加载方法的比较。

Comparison of cell-loading methods in hydrogel systems.

机构信息

Department of Biomaterials, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.

出版信息

J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014 Apr;102(4):935-46. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34784. Epub 2013 May 22.

Abstract

Bone regenerative medicine, based on the combined use of cells and scaffolds, represents a promising strategy in bone regeneration. Hydrogels have attracted huge interests for application as a scaffold for minimally invasive surgery. Collagen and oligo(poly(ethylene glycol)fumarate) (OPF) hydrogels are the representatives of two main categories of hydrogels, that is, natural- and synthetic-based hydrogels. With these the optimal cell-loading (i.e., cell distribution inside the hydrogels) method was assessed. The cell behavior of both bone marrow- and adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM- and AT-MSCs) in three loading methods, which are dispersed (i.e., homogeneous cell encapsulation, D), sandwich (i.e., cells located in between two hydrogel layers, S), and spheroid (i.e., cell pellets encapsulation, Sp) loading in two hydrogel systems (i.e., collagen and OPF), was compared. The results suggested that the cell behavior was influenced by the hydrogel type, meaning cells cultured in collagen hydrogels had higher proliferation and osteogenic differentiation capacity than in OPF hydrogels. In addition, AT-MSCs exhibited higher proliferation and osteogenic properties compared to BM-MSCs. However, no difference was observed for mineralization among the three loading methods, which did not approve the hypothesis that S and Sp loading would increase osteogenic capacity compared to D loading. In conclusion, D and Sp loading represents two promising cell loading methods for injectable bone substitute materials that allow application of minimally invasive surgery for cell-based regenerative treatment.

摘要

基于细胞和支架联合使用的骨再生医学代表了骨再生的一种很有前途的策略。水凝胶因其作为微创手术支架的应用而受到极大关注。胶原蛋白和聚(聚乙二醇)琥珀酸酯(OPF)水凝胶是两种主要水凝胶类别的代表,即天然和合成水凝胶。使用这些水凝胶来评估最佳的细胞负载(即细胞在水凝胶内的分布)方法。骨髓和脂肪组织来源间充质干细胞(BM-MSCs 和 AT-MSCs)在三种加载方法(即分散(即均匀细胞包封,D)、夹层(即细胞位于两层水凝胶之间,S)和球体(即细胞球包封,Sp))在两种水凝胶系统(即胶原蛋白和 OPF)中的细胞行为进行了比较。结果表明,细胞行为受水凝胶类型的影响,即在胶原蛋白水凝胶中培养的细胞比在 OPF 水凝胶中具有更高的增殖和成骨分化能力。此外,与 BM-MSCs 相比,AT-MSCs 表现出更高的增殖和成骨特性。然而,三种加载方法之间的矿化没有差异,这也不支持 S 和 Sp 加载比 D 加载会增加成骨能力的假设。总之,D 和 Sp 加载是两种有前途的细胞负载方法,可用于可注射骨替代材料,允许应用微创手术进行基于细胞的再生治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验