Department of Specialist, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine.
Respir Care. 2013 Dec;58(12):2053-60. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02225. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
The outcomes of patients admitted to a respiratory ICU (RICU) have been evaluated in the past, but no study has considered the influence of location prior to RICU admission.
We analyzed prospectively collected data from 326 consecutive patients admitted to a 7-bed RICU. The primary end points were survival and severity of morbidity-related complications, evaluated according to the patient's location prior to RICU admission. Three admission pathways were considered: step-down for patients transferred from the ICUs of our hospital; step-up for patients coming from our respiratory wards or other medical wards; and directly for patients coming from the emergency department. The secondary end point was the potential influence of several risk factors for morbidity and mortality.
Of the 326 subjects, 92 (28%) died. Overall, subjects admitted in a step-up process had a significantly higher mortality (P < .001) than subjects in the other groups. The mortality rate was 64% for subjects admitted from respiratory ward, 43% for those from medical wards, and 18% for subjects from both ICU and emergency department (respiratory ward vs medical ward P = .04, respiratory ward vs emergency department P < .001, respiratory ward vs ICU P < .001, medical ward vs emergency department P < .001, and medical ward vs ICU P < .001). Subjects admitted from a respiratory ward had a lower albumin level, and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II was significantly higher in subjects following a step-up admission. About 30% of the subjects admitted from a respiratory ward received noninvasive ventilation as a "ceiling treatment." The highest odds ratios related to survival were subject location prior to RICU admission and female sex. Lack of use of noninvasive ventilation, younger age, female sex, higher albumin level, lower Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, higher Barthel score, and absence of chronic heart failure were also statistically associated with a lower risk of death.
The pathway of admission to a RICU is a determinant of outcome. Patients following a step-up pattern are more likely to die. Other major determinants of survival are age, nutritional status and female sex.
过去已经评估了入住呼吸重症监护病房(RICU)的患者的结局,但尚无研究考虑入住 RICU 前的位置对结局的影响。
我们前瞻性分析了连续入住我院 7 张床位的 RICU 的 326 例患者的数据。主要终点是根据患者入住 RICU 前的位置评估的生存和与发病率相关的并发症的严重程度。考虑了三种入院途径:从我院 ICU 转入的患者为下转途径;从呼吸病房或其他内科病房转来的患者为上转途径;从急诊科直接转来的患者为直接途径。次要终点是发病率和死亡率的几个危险因素的潜在影响。
326 例患者中,92 例(28%)死亡。总体而言,上转途径入院的患者死亡率明显更高(P<0.001)。来自呼吸病房的患者死亡率为 64%,来自内科病房的患者死亡率为 43%,来自 ICU 和急诊科的患者死亡率为 18%(呼吸病房与内科病房比较,P=0.04;呼吸病房与急诊科比较,P<0.001;呼吸病房与 ICU 比较,P<0.001;内科病房与急诊科比较,P<0.001;内科病房与 ICU 比较,P<0.001)。来自呼吸病房的患者白蛋白水平较低,Simplified Acute Physiology Score II 评分明显较高。约 30%来自呼吸病房的患者接受了无创通气作为“天花板治疗”。与生存相关的最高比值比与患者入住 RICU 前的位置和性别有关。未使用无创通气、年龄较小、女性、白蛋白水平较高、Simplified Acute Physiology Score II 评分较低、Barthel 评分较高和无慢性心力衰竭也是与死亡风险降低相关的统计学因素。
入住 RICU 的途径是结局的决定因素。采用上转模式的患者更有可能死亡。生存的其他主要决定因素是年龄、营养状况和性别。