• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

米那普仑与帕罗西汀治疗日本抑郁症患者的双盲对照研究。

Double-blind, comparative study of milnacipran and paroxetine in Japanese patients with major depression.

机构信息

International University of Health and Welfare, Tochigi.

出版信息

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:555-65. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S42915. Epub 2013 Apr 26.

DOI:10.2147/NDT.S42915
PMID:23650446
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3640608/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

A double-blind, parallel-group, controlled study was performed to investigate if milnacipran was noninferior to paroxetine in terms of improvement in symptoms of depression in Japanese patients with major depressive disorders in a fixed-dose design. The efficacy and safety of milnacipran 200 mg/day were also assessed in comparison with those at the standard dose of 100 mg/day.

RESULTS

Changes in 17-item Hamilton depression rating scale (HAM-D) total score (mean ± standard deviation) for group M1 (milnacipran 100 mg/day), group M2 (milnacipran 200 mg/day), and group PX (paroxetine 30 or 40 mg/day) were -12.9 ± 5.8, -12.8 ± 6.1, and -13.1 ± 6.2, respectively, and the estimated differences in total score for group PX (Dunnett's 95% simultaneous confidence interval) were 0.1 (-1.1 to 1.3) for group M1 and 0.3 (-0.9 to 1.5) for group M2. The noninferiority of groups M1 and M2 to group PX was thus confirmed, because the upper confidence limit of differences between groups M1 and PX and between groups M2 and PX was less than 2.0. The estimated mean difference of change in HAM-D total score (95% confidence interval) between groups M2 and M1 was 0.2 (-0.9 to 1.2), indicating a comparable change in total score for both groups. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was 71.7% for group M1, 68.8% for group M2, and 69.3% for group PX, indicating no significant difference between the three groups.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that milnacipran 100 mg/day and 200 mg/day is not inferior to paroxetine in terms of efficacy and safety.

摘要

背景与方法

一项双盲、平行组、对照研究旨在以固定剂量设计,调查米那普仑是否在改善日本重性抑郁障碍患者的抑郁症状方面不劣于帕罗西汀。还评估了米那普仑 200mg/天的疗效和安全性与 100mg/天的标准剂量相比。

结果

组 M1(米那普仑 100mg/天)、组 M2(米那普仑 200mg/天)和组 PX(帕罗西汀 30 或 40mg/天)的 17 项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D)总分变化(平均值±标准差)分别为-12.9±5.8、-12.8±6.1 和-13.1±6.2,组 PX 的总分估计差值(Dunnett 的 95%同时置信区间)分别为 0.1(-1.1 至 1.3)和 0.3(-0.9 至 1.5)。因此,证实了组 M1 和 M2 对组 PX 的非劣效性,因为组 M1 和 PX 之间以及组 M2 和 PX 之间差异的置信上限小于 2.0。组 M2 和 M1 之间 HAM-D 总分变化的估计平均差值(95%置信区间)为 0.2(-0.9 至 1.2),表明两组总分的变化相当。组 M1 的治疗相关不良事件发生率为 71.7%,组 M2 为 68.8%,组 PX 为 69.3%,三组间无显著差异。

结论

这些结果表明,米那普仑 100mg/天和 200mg/天在疗效和安全性方面不劣于帕罗西汀。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b3/3640608/653f18c576b3/ndt-9-555f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b3/3640608/db13db48aec9/ndt-9-555f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b3/3640608/ca38f01d3bc5/ndt-9-555f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b3/3640608/fc7a0febadd2/ndt-9-555f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b3/3640608/1cdf3744255a/ndt-9-555f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b3/3640608/151db90e82b4/ndt-9-555f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b3/3640608/653f18c576b3/ndt-9-555f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b3/3640608/db13db48aec9/ndt-9-555f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b3/3640608/ca38f01d3bc5/ndt-9-555f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b3/3640608/fc7a0febadd2/ndt-9-555f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b3/3640608/1cdf3744255a/ndt-9-555f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b3/3640608/151db90e82b4/ndt-9-555f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b3/3640608/653f18c576b3/ndt-9-555f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Double-blind, comparative study of milnacipran and paroxetine in Japanese patients with major depression.米那普仑与帕罗西汀治疗日本抑郁症患者的双盲对照研究。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:555-65. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S42915. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
2
Effect of high-dose milnacipran in patients with depression.米那普仑高剂量治疗抑郁症的效果。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2007;3(5):699-702.
3
Long-term efficacy and safety of milnacipran compared to clomipramine in patients with major depression.米那普明与氯米帕明治疗重度抑郁症患者的长期疗效及安全性比较
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997 Dec;96(6):497-504. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb09953.x.
4
Comparison of efficacy and safety of milnacipran and fluoxetine in Korean patients with major depression.米那普明与氟西汀治疗韩国重度抑郁症患者的疗效及安全性比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Sep;21(9):1369-75. doi: 10.1185/030079905X59166.
5
Duloxetine in the acute and long-term treatment of major depressive disorder: a placebo- and paroxetine-controlled trial.度洛西汀用于重度抑郁症的急性和长期治疗:一项安慰剂及帕罗西汀对照试验
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004 Dec;14(6):457-70. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2004.01.002.
6
Comparison of Hypericum extract WS 5570 and paroxetine in ongoing treatment after recovery from an episode of moderate to severe depression: results from a randomized multicenter study.金丝桃提取物 WS 5570 与帕罗西汀用于中重度抑郁症发作恢复后的持续治疗比较:一项随机多中心研究的结果
Pharmacopsychiatry. 2006 Nov;39(6):213-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-951388.
7
A double-blind comparison of the efficacy and safety of milnacipran and fluoxetine in depressed inpatients.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1998 May;13(3):121-8. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199805000-00005.
8
Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence.恢复性研究329:帕罗西汀和丙咪嗪治疗青少年重度抑郁症的疗效与危害。
BMJ. 2015 Sep 16;351:h4320. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4320.
9
Mirtazapine compared with paroxetine in major depression.米氮平与帕罗西汀治疗重度抑郁症的比较。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2000 Sep;61(9):656-63. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v61n0911.
10
Duloxetine in the treatment of depression: a double-blind placebo-controlled comparison with paroxetine.度洛西汀治疗抑郁症:与帕罗西汀的双盲安慰剂对照比较。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004 Aug;24(4):389-99. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000132448.65972.d9.

本文引用的文献

1
Milnacipran and venlafaxine at flexible doses (up to 200 mg/day) in the outpatient treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder: a 24-week randomized, double-blind exploratory study.米那普仑与文拉法辛在门诊治疗中对成人中重度抑郁障碍的灵活剂量(最高 200mg/天):一项为期 24 周的随机、双盲探索性研究。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010 Apr 7;6:71-9.
2
Effect of high-dose milnacipran in patients with depression.米那普仑高剂量治疗抑郁症的效果。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2007;3(5):699-702.
3
Remission rates with milnacipran 100 mg/day and 150 mg/day in the long-term treatment of major depression.
米那普明100毫克/天和150毫克/天用于重度抑郁症长期治疗的缓解率。
Clin Drug Investig. 2006;26(3):135-42. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200626030-00003.
4
SNRIs: their pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and tolerability in comparison with other classes of antidepressants.5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂:与其他类抗抑郁药相比,它们的药理学、临床疗效及耐受性
CNS Spectr. 2005 Sep;10(9):732-47. doi: 10.1017/s1092852900019726.
5
Post-treatment emergent adverse events in depressed patients following treatment with milnacipran and paroxetine.米那普明和帕罗西汀治疗后抑郁症患者出现的治疗后新发不良事件。
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2004 Dec;19(8):585-6. doi: 10.1002/hup.644.
6
A comparative study of milnacipran and paroxetine in outpatients with major depression.米那普明与帕罗西汀治疗门诊重性抑郁症患者的对照研究。
J Affect Disord. 2004 Dec;83(2-3):233-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2004.07.002.
7
Controlled comparison of two different doses of milnacipran in major depressive outpatients.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004 Nov;19(6):343-6. doi: 10.1097/00004850-200411000-00005.
8
A comparative study of milnacipran and imipramine in the treatment of major depressive disorder.米那普明与丙咪嗪治疗重度抑郁症的比较研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Jun;20(6):855-60. doi: 10.1185/030079904125003719.
9
A randomised, double-blind comparison of milnacipran and imipramine in the treatment of depression.米那普明与丙咪嗪治疗抑郁症的随机双盲对照研究
J Affect Disord. 2002 Oct;72(1):21-31. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(01)00422-0.
10
Neurochemical and behavioural characterization of milnacipran, a serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor in rats.米那普明(一种5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂)在大鼠体内的神经化学和行为学特征
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002 Jul;162(3):323-32. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1111-5. Epub 2002 Jun 12.