Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013 Aug;52(8):1492-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket164. Epub 2013 May 6.
The objectives of the study are to describe the Spondyloarthritis Caught Early (SPACE) cohort, present the performance of various SpA classification criteria and compare patients fulfilling the imaging arm with patients fulfilling the clinical arm of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society (ASAS) axSpA criteria on demographics, presence of SpA features and level of disease activity.
Patients with back pain (≥3 months but ≤2 years, onset <45 years) visiting the rheumatology outpatient clinic of the Leiden University Medical Center were included in the SPACE cohort. Patients were classified according to the modified New York (mNY), ESSG, Amor and ASAS axSpA criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of criteria were tested against a rheumatologist's diagnosis.
In total, 157 patients were included; 92 patients fulfilled any criteria, 11 fulfilled the mNY (sensitivity 16.9%, specificity 100%), 68 the ESSG (sensitivity 64.6%, specificity 71.7%), 48 the Amor (sensitivity 47.7%, specificity 81.5%) and 60 the ASAS axSpA criteria (sensitivity 84.6%, specificity 94.6%). Of those 60 patients, 30 fulfilled the imaging arm and 30 the clinical arm. Patients in the imaging arm are statistically significantly more often male, have a longer symptom duration and less often a positive family history for SpA than patients fulfilling the clinical arm. Patients in both arms are very similar regarding all other SpA features and level of disease activity.
The inclusion criteria of the SPACE cohort yield the same high numbers of SpA patients compared with referral strategies like inflammatory back pain, HLA-B27+ or sacroiliitis, yet are easier to apply. The ASAS axSpA criteria outperformed the other criteria; 38.2% fulfilled the ASAS axSpA criteria. Patients fulfilling the clinical arm of the ASAS axSpA reflect a group of patients similar to those fulfilling the imaging arm.
本研究旨在描述 Spondyloarthritis Caught Early(SPACE)队列,介绍各种 SpA 分类标准的表现,并比较符合 ASAS 中轴型 SpA 标准影像学标准和临床标准的患者在人口统计学特征、SpA 特征和疾病活动水平方面的差异。
我们将莱顿大学医学中心风湿病门诊就诊的背痛(≥3 个月但≤2 年,发病年龄<45 岁)患者纳入 SPACE 队列。患者根据改良纽约(mNY)、ESSG、 Amor 和 ASAS 中轴型 SpA 标准进行分类。我们测试了标准对风湿病医生诊断的敏感性和特异性。
共纳入 157 例患者;92 例符合任何标准,11 例符合 mNY(敏感性 16.9%,特异性 100%),68 例符合 ESSG(敏感性 64.6%,特异性 71.7%),48 例符合 Amor(敏感性 47.7%,特异性 81.5%)和 60 例符合 ASAS 中轴型 SpA 标准(敏感性 84.6%,特异性 94.6%)。在这 60 例患者中,30 例符合影像学标准,30 例符合临床标准。影像学组患者的性别、症状持续时间和阳性 SpA 家族史明显多于临床组患者。两组患者在其他 SpA 特征和疾病活动水平方面非常相似。
与炎症性背痛、HLA-B27+或骶髂关节炎等转诊策略相比,SPACE 队列的纳入标准产生了同样多的 SpA 患者,但更容易实施。ASAS 中轴型 SpA 标准的表现优于其他标准;38.2%的患者符合 ASAS 中轴型 SpA 标准。符合 ASAS 中轴型 SpA 临床标准的患者反映了一组与符合影像学标准的患者相似的患者。