Hsieh Chia-Chen, Chen Chi-An, Hsiao Fei-Hsiu, Shun Shiow-Ching
Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Apr;23(7-8):985-94. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12232. Epub 2013 May 8.
To compare quality of life and its related factors, which include sexual activity, sleep problems, depression, anxiety and attachment styles in close relationships, between gynaecological cancer survivors and noncancer women.
The majority of studies focus on examining the relationships between the late-treatment side effects and quality of life in gynaecological cancer survivors. As a result, there is insufficient information about what are the correlations between psychosocial factors and quality of life in gynaecological cancer survivors.
Cross-sectional study.
The quality of life of the 85 gynaecological cancer patients who had completed active treatments for at least six months was compared with the 85 age-matched women without cancer history. Measures included SF-12 Health Surveys, Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale, Beck Depression Inventory-II, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Sexual Activity Questionnaire and Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised.
There were no significant differences in the quality of life between gynaecological cancer survivors and noncancer women. However, higher attachment-related anxiety in close relationship was the main factor associated with the lower physical quality of life in the gynaecological cancer survivor group. In contrast, older ages were correlated with lower physical quality of life in noncancer women. Anxiety level was the main factor associated with lower mental quality of life for both groups.
Different from noncancer women, the psychosocial factor of insecure attachment in close relationships was the main factor associated with physical quality of life for gynaecological cancer survivors. Anxiety status was the common factor correlated with mental quality of life for cancer and noncancer women.
Developing psychosocial interventions focusing on secure attachment in close relationships and anxiety management could improve physical and mental components of quality of life among gynaecological cancer survivors.
比较妇科癌症幸存者与非癌症女性之间的生活质量及其相关因素,这些因素包括性活动、睡眠问题、抑郁、焦虑以及亲密关系中的依恋风格。
大多数研究集中于探讨妇科癌症幸存者的后期治疗副作用与生活质量之间的关系。因此,关于妇科癌症幸存者心理社会因素与生活质量之间的相关性信息不足。
横断面研究。
将85名已完成至少六个月积极治疗的妇科癌症患者的生活质量与85名年龄匹配且无癌症病史的女性进行比较。测量指标包括SF-12健康调查、医学结局研究睡眠量表、贝克抑郁量表第二版、状态-特质焦虑量表、性活动问卷以及亲密关系经历修订版。
妇科癌症幸存者与非癌症女性在生活质量方面无显著差异。然而,亲密关系中较高的依恋相关焦虑是妇科癌症幸存者组身体生活质量较低的主要相关因素。相比之下,年龄较大与非癌症女性较低的身体生活质量相关。焦虑水平是两组心理生活质量较低的主要相关因素。
与非癌症女性不同,亲密关系中不安全依恋的心理社会因素是妇科癌症幸存者身体生活质量的主要相关因素。焦虑状态是癌症和非癌症女性心理生活质量的共同相关因素。
开展侧重于亲密关系中安全依恋和焦虑管理的心理社会干预措施,可改善妇科癌症幸存者生活质量的身体和心理方面。