Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Department of Health Economics (iMTA), Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Aug;132(2):353-60.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 May 4.
Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual allergen immunotherapy (SLIT) are safe and effective treatments of allergic rhinitis, but high levels of compliance and persistence are crucial to achieving the desired clinical effects.
Our objective was to assess levels and predictors of compliance and persistence among grass pollen, tree pollen, and house dust mite immunotherapy users in real life and to estimate the costs of premature discontinuation.
We performed a retrospective analysis of a community pharmacy database from The Netherlands containing data from 6486 patients starting immunotherapy for 1 or more of the allergens of interest between 1994 and 2009. Two thousand seven hundred ninety-six patients received SCIT, and 3690 received SLIT. Time to treatment discontinuation was analyzed and included Cox proportional hazard models with time-dependent covariates, where appropriate.
Overall, only 18% of users reached the minimally required duration of treatment of 3 years (SCIT, 23%; SLIT, 7%). Median durations for SCIT and SLIT users were 1.7 and 0.6 years, respectively (P < .001). Other independent predictors of premature discontinuation were prescriber, with patients of general practitioners demonstrating longer persistence than those of allergologists and other medical specialists; single-allergen immunotherapy, lower socioeconomic status; and younger age. Of the persistent patients, 56% were never late in picking up their medication from the pharmacy. Direct medication costs per nonpersistent patient discontinuing in the third year of treatment were €3800, an amount that was largely misspent.
Real-life persistence is better in SCIT users than in SLIT users, although it is low overall. There is an urgent need for further identification of potential barriers and measures that will enhance persistence and compliance.
皮下变应原免疫疗法(SCIT)和舌下变应原免疫疗法(SLIT)是安全有效的过敏性鼻炎治疗方法,但为了达到预期的临床效果,高水平的依从性和持久性至关重要。
我们的目的是评估现实生活中草花粉、树花粉和屋尘螨免疫治疗使用者的依从性和持久性水平及其预测因素,并估算提前停药的成本。
我们对荷兰一家社区药房的数据库进行了回顾性分析,该数据库包含了 1994 年至 2009 年间 6486 例至少接受 1 种感兴趣过敏原免疫治疗的患者数据。2796 例患者接受 SCIT,3690 例患者接受 SLIT。分析了治疗中断时间,并在适当情况下使用包含时间依赖性协变量的 Cox 比例风险模型。
总体而言,只有 18%的使用者达到了至少 3 年的最低治疗时间(SCIT 为 23%,SLIT 为 7%)。SCIT 和 SLIT 使用者的中位治疗时间分别为 1.7 年和 0.6 年(P<0.001)。提前停药的其他独立预测因素包括医生,与过敏学家和其他医学专家相比,全科医生的患者持续时间更长;单一过敏原免疫治疗、较低的社会经济地位;以及年龄较小。在持续治疗的患者中,56%的患者从未在药剂师处延迟取药。在治疗的第 3 年提前停药的非持续治疗患者的直接药物治疗费用为 3800 欧元,这笔费用大部分都浪费了。
现实生活中 SCIT 使用者的持续治疗情况好于 SLIT 使用者,但总体而言仍较低。迫切需要进一步确定潜在障碍和措施,以提高治疗的持久性和依从性。