Becker Stefanie I
School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Jul;75(5):845-61. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0433-1.
Visual search is typically faster when the target from the previous trial is repeated than when it changes. This priming effect is commonly attributed to a selection bias for the target feature value or against the nontarget feature value that carries over to the next trial. By contrast, according to a relational account, what is primed in visual search is the target-nontarget relationship-namely, the feature that the target has in relation to the features in the nontarget context (e.g., larger, darker, redder)-and switch costs occur only when the target-nontarget relations reverse across trials. Here, the relational account was tested against current feature-based views in three eye movement experiments that used different shape search tasks (e.g., geometrical figures varying in the number of corners). For all tested shapes, reversing the target-nontarget relationships produced switch costs of the same magnitude as directly switching the target and nontarget features across trials ("full-switch"). In particular, changing only the nontargets produced large switch costs, even when the target feature was always repeated across trials. By contrast, no switch costs were observed when both the target and nontarget features changed, such that the coarse target-nontarget relations remained constant across trials. These results support the relational account over feature-based accounts of priming and indicate that a target's shape can be encoded relative to the shapes in the nontarget context.
在前一次试验中的目标重复出现时,视觉搜索通常比目标发生变化时更快。这种启动效应通常归因于对目标特征值的选择偏差或对非目标特征值的偏差,这种偏差会延续到下一次试验。相比之下,根据一种关系性解释,在视觉搜索中被启动的是目标与非目标的关系,即目标相对于非目标背景中的特征所具有的特征(例如,更大、更暗、更红),并且只有当目标与非目标的关系在不同试验中发生反转时才会出现切换成本。在此,在三个眼动实验中,针对当前基于特征的观点对关系性解释进行了测试,这些实验使用了不同的形状搜索任务(例如,角的数量不同的几何图形)。对于所有测试的形状,反转目标与非目标的关系所产生的切换成本与在不同试验中直接切换目标和非目标特征(“完全切换”)所产生的切换成本大小相同。特别是,仅改变非目标会产生较大的切换成本,即使目标特征在不同试验中总是重复出现。相比之下,当目标和非目标特征都发生变化,使得粗略的目标与非目标关系在不同试验中保持不变时,未观察到切换成本。这些结果支持了关于启动效应的关系性解释而非基于特征的解释,并表明目标的形状可以相对于非目标背景中的形状进行编码。