• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测试视觉觅食中搜索模板的关系解释。

Testing a relational account of search templates in visual foraging.

机构信息

Cognitive Neuroscience of Perception and Action, Department of Psychology, Philipps-University Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 2;13(1):12541. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38362-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-38362-9
PMID:37532742
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10397186/
Abstract

Search templates guide human visual attention toward relevant targets. Templates are often seen as encoding exact target features, but recent studies suggest that templates rather contain "relational properties" (e.g., they facilitate "redder" stimuli instead of specific hues of red). Such relational guidance seems helpful in naturalistic searches where illumination or perspective renders exact feature values unreliable. So far relational guidance has only been demonstrated in rather artificial single-target search tasks with briefly flashed displays. Here, we investigate whether relational guidance also occurs when humans interact with the search environment for longer durations to collect multiple target elements. In a visual foraging task, participants searched for and collected multiple targets among distractors of different relationships to the target colour. Distractors whose colour differed from the environment in the same direction as the targets reduced foraging efficiency to the same amount as distractors whose colour matched the target colour. Distractors that differed by the same colour distance but in the opposite direction of the target colour did not reduce efficiency. These findings provide evidence that search templates encode relational target features in naturalistic search tasks and suggest that attention guidance based on relational features is a common mode in dynamic, real-world search environments.

摘要

搜索模板引导人类视觉注意到相关目标。模板通常被视为编码确切的目标特征,但最近的研究表明,模板反而包含“关系属性”(例如,它们促进“更红”的刺激,而不是特定的红色调)。这种关系引导在自然搜索中很有帮助,在自然搜索中,光照或视角使得确切的特征值不可靠。到目前为止,关系引导仅在具有短暂闪烁显示的相当人为的单一目标搜索任务中得到证明。在这里,我们研究了当人类与搜索环境交互以更长时间收集多个目标元素时,关系引导是否也会发生。在视觉觅食任务中,参与者在与目标颜色具有不同关系的干扰项中搜索和收集多个目标。与目标颜色在同一方向上与环境颜色不同的干扰项会降低觅食效率,与目标颜色匹配的干扰项相同。颜色距离相同但与目标颜色方向相反的干扰项不会降低效率。这些发现为搜索模板在自然搜索任务中编码关系目标特征提供了证据,并表明基于关系特征的注意力引导是动态、真实世界搜索环境中的一种常见模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6d2/10397186/724d7699c0bd/41598_2023_38362_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6d2/10397186/666d432368c3/41598_2023_38362_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6d2/10397186/15cb802a40ce/41598_2023_38362_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6d2/10397186/3395a580969b/41598_2023_38362_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6d2/10397186/9e7724e03d25/41598_2023_38362_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6d2/10397186/eda8a5bce189/41598_2023_38362_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6d2/10397186/724d7699c0bd/41598_2023_38362_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6d2/10397186/666d432368c3/41598_2023_38362_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6d2/10397186/15cb802a40ce/41598_2023_38362_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6d2/10397186/3395a580969b/41598_2023_38362_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6d2/10397186/9e7724e03d25/41598_2023_38362_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6d2/10397186/eda8a5bce189/41598_2023_38362_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6d2/10397186/724d7699c0bd/41598_2023_38362_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Testing a relational account of search templates in visual foraging.测试视觉觅食中搜索模板的关系解释。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 2;13(1):12541. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38362-9.
2
The Preparatory Activation of Guidance Templates for Visual Search and of Target Templates in Non-Search Tasks.视觉搜索中引导模板和非搜索任务中目标模板的预备激活
J Cogn. 2024 Jan 10;7(1):11. doi: 10.5334/joc.341. eCollection 2024.
3
The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.视觉搜索准备过程中目标模板激活过程的时间进程。
J Neurosci. 2018 Oct 31;38(44):9527-9538. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0409-18.2018. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
4
The attentional template in high and low similarity search: Optimal tuning or tuning to relations?高、低相似度搜索中的注意模板:最佳调谐还是调谐关系?
Cognition. 2021 Jul;212:104732. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104732. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
5
Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.混合觅食搜索:搜索多种类型目标的多个实例。
Vision Res. 2016 Feb;119:50-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
6
The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search.目标-干扰物关系在视觉搜索中引导注意和眼睛的作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 May;139(2):247-65. doi: 10.1037/a0018808.
7
Attentional guidance by relative features: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.基于相对特征的注意力引导:行为学和电生理学证据。
Psychophysiology. 2016 Jul;53(7):1074-83. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12645. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
8
Dynamics of visual attention revealed in foraging tasks.视觉注意力在觅食任务中的动态变化。
Cognition. 2020 Jan;194:104032. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104032. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
9
Visual search and foraging compared in a large-scale search task.在一项大规模搜索任务中对视觉搜索和觅食进行比较。
Cogn Process. 2008 May;9(2):121-6. doi: 10.1007/s10339-007-0200-0. Epub 2008 Jan 10.
10
Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.在多个目标类别中进行搜索揭示了视觉工作记忆的灵活性。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Feb;183:108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Attention directs actions in visual foraging.注意力引导视觉觅食中的行动。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 6;15(1):15788. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97986-1.
2
No matter what you do, travel is travel in visual foraging.无论你做什么,旅行都是在进行视觉觅食。
Vision Res. 2024 Nov;224:108491. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2024.108491. Epub 2024 Sep 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Terms of debate: Consensus definitions to guide the scientific discourse on visual distraction.争议术语:指导视觉干扰科学论述的共识定义。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1445-1472. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02820-3. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
2
PyMC: a modern, and comprehensive probabilistic programming framework in Python.PyMC:Python 中一个现代且全面的概率编程框架。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023 Sep 1;9:e1516. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1516. eCollection 2023.
3
Good-enough attentional guidance.良好的注意力引导。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Apr;27(4):391-403. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.01.007. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
4
Target templates and the time course of distractor location learning.目标模板和分心物位置学习的时间进程。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 30;13(1):1672. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25816-9.
5
Attentional Guidance and Match Decisions Rely on Different Template Information During Visual Search.注意引导和匹配决策在视觉搜索中依赖不同的模板信息。
Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;33(1):105-120. doi: 10.1177/09567976211032225. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
6
How feature context alters attentional template switching.特征语境如何改变注意模板转换。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Nov;47(11):1431-1444. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000951. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
7
The attentional template in high and low similarity search: Optimal tuning or tuning to relations?高、低相似度搜索中的注意模板:最佳调谐还是调谐关系?
Cognition. 2021 Jul;212:104732. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104732. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
8
The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis.JASP 进行和报告贝叶斯分析的指南。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Jun;28(3):813-826. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01798-5.
9
Visual Search: How Do We Find What We Are Looking For?视觉搜索:我们如何找到我们正在寻找的东西?
Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2020 Sep 15;6:539-562. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-091718-015048. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
10
Direct evidence for the optimal tuning of attention.直接证据表明注意力的最佳调节。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Jul;46(7):716-728. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000744. Epub 2020 Apr 9.