Gallo Mark, Rinaldo Vince
Department of Biology, Niagara University, NY 14109.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2012 Dec 3;13(2):142-9. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v13i2.493. Print 2012.
An analysis of critical reading styles of freshmen and senior biology students was compared to that of biology faculty members through the use of highlighting a primary research article. Sentence-by-sentence comparisons were made within each group and the data were analyzed; the composite picture from each group was then compared to the other groups. There appears to be a close agreement of what is deemed important content as judged by faculty but less agreement by seniors and even less agreement by freshmen regarding the value of each line of the text. The results imply that experts in a field appear able to discriminate what is important and valuable in the primary literature and that the novice appears to develop some degree of scientific literacy during his or her undergraduate career.
通过对一篇主要研究文章进行标注,对新生和高年级生物学专业学生的批判性阅读风格与生物学教师的批判性阅读风格进行了分析比较。在每组内部进行逐句比较并分析数据;然后将每组的综合情况与其他组进行比较。由教师判断,对于什么是重要内容似乎有高度一致性,但高年级学生的一致性较低,而新生对于文本每行内容的价值的一致性更低。结果表明,该领域的专家似乎能够辨别专业文献中重要和有价值的内容,并且新手在其本科学习期间似乎能培养出一定程度的科学素养。