Suppr超能文献

看见人类:两种去人性化形式相关的独特且重叠的神经特征。

Seeing human: distinct and overlapping neural signatures associated with two forms of dehumanization.

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2013 Oct 1;79:313-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.109. Epub 2013 May 5.

Abstract

The process of dehumanization, or thinking of others as less than human, is a phenomenon with significant societal implications. According to Haslam's (2006) model, two concepts of humanness derive from comparing humans with either animals or machines: individuals may be dehumanized by likening them to either animals or machines, or humanized by emphasizing differences from animals or machines. Recent work in cognitive neuroscience emphasizes understanding cognitive processes in terms of interactions between distributed cortical networks. It has been found that reasoning about internal mental states is associated with activation of the default mode network (DMN) and deactivation of the task positive network (TPN); whereas reasoning about mechanical processes produces the opposite pattern. We conducted two neuroimaging studies. The first examined the neural bases of dehumanization and its relation to these two brain networks, using images and voice-over social narratives which either implicitly contrasted or implicitly likened humans to either animals or machines. The second study addressed a discrepancy between findings from the first study and prior work on the neural correlates of dehumanization: using a design similar to prior work we examined neural responses to pictures of humans, animals and machines, presented without any social context. In both studies, human and humanizing conditions were associated with relatively high activity in the DMN and relatively low activity in the TPN. However, the non-human and dehumanizing conditions deviated in different ways: they demonstrated more marked changes either in the DMN or in the TPN. Notably, differences between the animal dehumanizing and humanizing conditions were most evident in regions associated with mechanistic reasoning, not in the mentalizing network. Conjunction analysis of contrasts from both paradigms revealed that only one region was consistently more active when participants saw human, a medial parietal region regarded as the central hub of the DMN. These findings provide a neural basis for Haslam's distinction between two types of dehumanization, and suggest that the DMN and TPN play opposing roles in creating a sense of moral concern.

摘要

去人性化的过程,即将他人视为不如人类,是一种具有重要社会意义的现象。根据哈斯拉姆(Haslam)的(2006)模型,两种人性概念源于将人与动物或机器进行比较:可以通过将人与动物或机器进行比较来将其去人性化,也可以通过强调人与动物或机器的差异来将其人性化。认知神经科学的最新研究强调了根据分布式皮质网络之间的相互作用来理解认知过程。已经发现,关于内部心理状态的推理与默认模式网络(DMN)的激活和任务积极网络(TPN)的去激活有关;而关于机械过程的推理则产生相反的模式。我们进行了两项神经影像学研究。第一项研究使用图像和旁白社会叙述来检验去人性化的神经基础及其与这两个大脑网络的关系,这些叙述要么隐含地将人与动物或机器进行对比,要么将人与动物或机器进行比较。第二项研究解决了第一个研究中的发现与之前关于去人性化的神经相关性的研究之间的差异:我们使用与之前的研究类似的设计,检查了人类、动物和机器的图片在没有任何社会背景的情况下呈现时对神经的反应。在这两项研究中,人与人性化条件与 DMN 的相对高活动和 TPN 的相对低活动相关。然而,非人类和去人性化条件以不同的方式偏离:它们在 DMN 或 TPN 中表现出更明显的变化。值得注意的是,动物去人性化和人性化条件之间的差异在与机械推理相关的区域最为明显,而不是在心理化网络中。来自两个范式的对比的联合分析表明,只有一个区域在参与者看到人类时始终更加活跃,该区域是被认为是 DMN 的中央枢纽的内侧顶叶区域。这些发现为哈斯拉姆(Haslam)区分两种去人性化类型提供了神经基础,并表明 DMN 和 TPN 在产生道德关注感方面发挥了相反的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验