• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体间威胁与暴力的神经科学

The neuroscience of intergroup threat and violence.

作者信息

Lantos Dorottya, Molenberghs Pascal

机构信息

Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Social Research Institute, University College London, United Kingdom.

ISN Psychology, Institute for Social Neuroscience, Australia.

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Dec;131:77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.025. Epub 2021 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.025
PMID:34534553
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9620594/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic led to a global increase in hate crimes and xenophobia. In these uncertain times, real or imaginary threats can easily lead to intergroup conflict. Here, we integrate social neuroscience findings with classic social psychology theories into a framework to better understand how intergroup threat can lead to violence. The role of moral disengagement, dehumanization, and intergroup schadenfreude in this process are discussed, together with their underlying neural mechanisms. We outline how this framework can inform social scientists and policy makers to help reduce the escalation of intergroup conflict and promote intergroup cooperation. The critical role of the media and public figures in these unprecedented times is highlighted as an important factor to achieve these goals.

摘要

新冠疫情导致全球仇恨犯罪和仇外心理增加。在这些不确定的时期,真实的或想象的威胁很容易引发群体间冲突。在此,我们将社会神经科学的研究结果与经典社会心理学理论整合到一个框架中,以更好地理解群体间威胁如何导致暴力。本文讨论了道德推脱、非人化和群体间幸灾乐祸在此过程中的作用及其潜在的神经机制。我们概述了这个框架如何为社会科学家和政策制定者提供信息,以帮助减少群体间冲突的升级并促进群体间合作。在这些前所未有的时期,媒体和公众人物的关键作用被强调为实现这些目标的一个重要因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46bf/9620594/6ff453014baf/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46bf/9620594/6ff453014baf/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46bf/9620594/6ff453014baf/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
The neuroscience of intergroup threat and violence.群体间威胁与暴力的神经科学
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Dec;131:77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.025. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
2
How Do Pandemic Policies and Communication Shape Intergroup Outcomes? Initial Findings From the COVID-19 Pandemic and Open Questions for Research and Policy.大流行政策和沟通如何塑造群体间结果?COVID-19 大流行的初步发现和研究与政策的开放性问题。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Jul;19(4):694-703. doi: 10.1177/17456916231185298. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
3
Effects of COVID-19 related economic threat on political conservatism, xenophobia, and racial bias in the United States.新冠疫情相关经济威胁对美国政治保守主义、仇外心理和种族偏见的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 18;19(9):e0309766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309766. eCollection 2024.
4
Detection of Hate Speech in COVID-19-Related Tweets in the Arab Region: Deep Learning and Topic Modeling Approach.检测阿拉伯地区与 COVID-19 相关推文的仇恨言论:深度学习和主题建模方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 8;22(12):e22609. doi: 10.2196/22609.
5
Destined to die but not to wage war: how existential threat can contribute to escalation or de-escalation of violent intergroup conflict.命中注定要灭亡,但不能发动战争:生存威胁如何导致暴力的群体间冲突升级或降级。
Am Psychol. 2013 Oct;68(7):543-58. doi: 10.1037/a0033052.
6
The onset of COVID-19, common identity, and intergroup prejudice.新冠疫情的爆发、共同身份认同与群体间偏见。
J Soc Psychol. 2021 Jul 4;161(4):435-451. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2021.1918620. Epub 2021 Jul 11.
7
Racism and Xenophobia in a Pandemic: Interactions of Online and Offline Worlds.大流行中的种族主义和仇外心理:线上与线下世界的互动
Am J Public Health. 2021 May;111(5):773-775. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306230.
8
2020 Syndemic: Convergence of COVID-19, Gender-Based Violence, and Racism Pandemics.2020 年综合征:新冠疫情、性别暴力和种族主义大流行的交汇。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Dec;9(6):2077-2089. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01146-w. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
9
Meta-humanization reduces prejudice, even under high intergroup threat.超人类化能够减少偏见,即便在群体间威胁程度很高的情况下也是如此。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Mar;120(3):651-671. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000259. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
10
Perspectives on xenophobia during epidemics and implications for emergency management.疫情期间仇外心理的视角及其对应急管理的影响。
J Emerg Manag. 2020;18(7):23-29. doi: 10.5055/jem.2020.0521.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding intergroup violence justification: the role of ethnicity and perceived threat in Israeli society.理解群体间暴力的正当性:种族和感知到的威胁在以色列社会中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 18;16:1508324. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1508324. eCollection 2025.
2
Neural synchronization and its impact on intergroup attitudes in dynamic interactions.神经同步及其在动态互动中对群体间态度的影响。
Commun Biol. 2025 Feb 26;8(1):312. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-07776-8.
3
The Dual Effect of COVID-19 on Intergroup Conflict in the Korean Peninsula.

本文引用的文献

1
Fusiform Activity Distinguishes Between Subjects With Low and High Xenophobic Attitudes Toward Refugees.梭状回活动可区分对难民有低仇外态度和高仇外态度的受试者。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2020 Sep 11;14:98. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00098. eCollection 2020.
2
Functional neuroanatomy of racial categorization from visual perception: A meta-analytic study.种族分类的视觉感知功能神经解剖学:一项荟萃分析研究。
Neuroimage. 2020 Aug 15;217:116939. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116939. Epub 2020 May 16.
3
The neural mechanisms of threat and reconciliation efforts between Muslims and non-Muslims.
新冠疫情对朝鲜半岛群体间冲突的双重影响。
J Conflict Resolut. 2022 Nov;66(10):1908-1930. doi: 10.1177/00220027221107088.
4
Exposure to hate speech deteriorates neurocognitive mechanisms of the ability to understand others' pain.接触仇恨言论会损害理解他人痛苦的神经认知机制。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 13;13(1):4127. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31146-1.
5
Neural mechanisms of intergroup exclusion and retaliatory aggression.群体间排斥和报复性攻击的神经机制。
Soc Neurosci. 2022 Aug;17(4):339-351. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2022.2086617. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
穆斯林和非穆斯林之间的威胁和和解努力的神经机制。
Soc Neurosci. 2020 Aug;15(4):420-434. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2020.1754287. Epub 2020 May 4.
4
Racism and discrimination in COVID-19 responses.新冠疫情应对中的种族主义与歧视。
Lancet. 2020 Apr 11;395(10231):1194. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30792-3. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
5
Toward an integrative science of social vision in intergroup bias.在群体间偏见的社会视觉综合科学研究中
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Jul;102:318-326. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 Apr 28.
6
Insights From fMRI Studies Into Ingroup Bias.功能磁共振成像研究对群体内偏见的见解。
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 1;9:1868. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01868. eCollection 2018.
7
Denying humanity: The distinct neural correlates of blatant dehumanization.否认人性:公然去人性化的独特神经关联。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Jul;147(7):1078-1093. doi: 10.1037/xge0000417. Epub 2018 May 31.
8
Neurocognitive Basis of Racial Ingroup Bias in Empathy.共情中内群体种族偏见的神经认知基础。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 May;22(5):400-421. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
9
Lateral orbitofrontal cortex activity is modulated by group membership in situations of justified and unjustified violence.在正当和不正当暴力情境中,眶额外侧皮质活动受群体成员身份的调节。
Soc Neurosci. 2018 Dec;13(6):739-755. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2017.1392342. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
10
Dead salmon and voodoo correlations: should we be sceptical about functional MRI?死三文鱼与巫毒相关性:我们是否应对功能磁共振成像持怀疑态度?
Brain. 2017 Aug 1;140(8):e53. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx180.