Kågedal B, Olsson B
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden.
J Chromatogr. 1990 Apr 27;527(1):21-30. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(00)82079-4.
Three ion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatographic methods for the determination of creatinine in serum have been compared. In method 1 a strong cation exchanger was used. In method 2 a reversed-phase column was given strong cation-exchange properties by the addition of N-methyloleoyl taurate to the mobile phase. In method 3 a weak cation exchanger was used. Elution was with a pH gradient in methods 1 and 2, and isocratic elution was used in method 3. The imprecision was similar for the three methods and varied between 0.9 and 2.5% as studied within-day and between 1.4 and 3.2% from day-to-day. The lowest coefficient of variation was obtained around the upper reference limit. Analytical recoveries were quantitative for the three methods. The method with N-methyloleoyl taurate showed no advantages over the conventional strong cation exchanger. With the weak cation exchanger no interferences were detected from compounds investigated, but with the strong cation exchanger a slight interference was obtained with uric acid. We prefer the weak cation-exchange method because of its simplicity, higher throughput and absence of interference from hitherto tested compounds.
比较了三种离子交换高效液相色谱法测定血清肌酐的方法。方法1使用强阳离子交换剂。方法2通过在流动相中添加N-甲基油酰牛磺酸盐,使反相柱具有强阳离子交换性能。方法3使用弱阳离子交换剂。方法1和方法2采用pH梯度洗脱,方法3采用等度洗脱。三种方法的不精密度相似,日内研究时变异在0.9%至2.5%之间,日间变异在1.4%至3.2%之间。在上参考限附近获得最低变异系数。三种方法的分析回收率均为定量。含N-甲基油酰牛磺酸盐的方法与传统强阳离子交换剂相比无优势。使用弱阳离子交换剂时,未检测到所研究化合物的干扰,但使用强阳离子交换剂时,尿酸有轻微干扰。由于其简单性、更高的通量以及迄今测试的化合物无干扰,我们更喜欢弱阳离子交换法。