Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA,
Hernia. 2013 Oct;17(5):627-32. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1092-9. Epub 2013 May 9.
Open and laparoscopic approaches to ventral hernia repair are generally exclusive of each other. However, select patients with difficult hernias may benefit from combined open/laparoscopic hybrid techniques to avoid dissection of large subcutaneous flaps.
Seven patients underwent combined laparoscopic and open approaches for ventral hernia repair. Records were reviewed for technical details, demographics, hernia and mesh characteristics, and postoperative outcomes.
Two hybrid techniques were used: (1) initial laparoscopic approach converted to open adhesiolysis followed by totally laparoscopic mesh fixation and (2) open repair and adhesiolysis with laparoscopic-assisted mesh fixation. In the first approach, after conversion to open adhesiolysis, mesh with four quadrant sutures was placed intraabdominally. Pneumoperitoneum was re-established, and the mesh was fixed laparoscopically with sutures and tacks in standard fashion. For the second hybrid approach, after hernia reduction and adhesiolysis, mesh was anchored with sutures placed at 3-4 cm intervals with a Reverdin needle and further secured posteriorly with a hernia tacker over 180° circumference. Prior to tying the contralateral transfascial sutures, two 5-mm laparoscopic ports were placed lateral to the mesh under direct vision on the opposite side. Once the facial sutures were tied, pneumoperitoneum was established, and the contralateral side of mesh was tacked laparoscopically. Mean patient age was 65 years and BMI 38. Mean defect size was 10.6 cm × 8.3 cm and mean mesh size was 25 cm × 19 cm. Operative time was 318 min (210-405 min). Hospital stay was 5 days (4-7 days). Morbidity was 57 % including one deep wound infection and a chronic sinus requiring reoperation. There were no hernia recurrences with average follow-up of 15 months (3-63 months).
Hybrid laparoscopic and open techniques may be used in obese patients with difficult incisional hernias requiring open adhesiolysis. Further studies need to be done to better delineate hernia characteristics of patients that may benefit from this approach.
开放和腹腔镜方法通常彼此排斥用于腹疝修补术。然而,对于一些具有复杂疝的患者,采用联合开放/腹腔镜杂交技术可能会避免分离大的皮下皮瓣,从而受益于此。
对 7 例接受腹腔镜和开放联合方法治疗腹疝的患者进行了回顾性研究。记录了手术技术细节、人口统计学、疝和网片特征以及术后结果。
使用了两种杂交技术:(1)初始腹腔镜方法转为开放粘连松解,然后完全腹腔镜下固定网片;(2)开放修补和粘连松解,腹腔镜辅助网片固定。在第一种方法中,转为开放粘连松解后,将带有四个象限缝线的网片放置在腹腔内。重新建立气腹,然后用缝线和缝合钉钉固定网片,采用标准方式固定。对于第二种杂交方法,疝复位和粘连松解后,用缝线每隔 3-4cm 在网片上缝合,用 Reverdind 针将缝线穿过网片,然后用疝修补钉在 180°圆周上固定网片的后缘。在结扎对侧跨筋膜缝线之前,在直视下在网片的对侧侧面放置两个 5mm 的腹腔镜端口。一旦结扎对面的缝线,就建立气腹,并在腹腔镜下固定网片的对侧。患者平均年龄为 65 岁,BMI 为 38。平均缺损大小为 10.6cm×8.3cm,平均网片大小为 25cm×19cm。手术时间为 318 分钟(210-405 分钟)。住院时间为 5 天(4-7 天)。并发症发生率为 57%,包括一例深部伤口感染和一例需要再次手术的慢性窦道。平均随访 15 个月(3-63 个月),无疝复发。
对于需要开放粘连松解的肥胖且具有复杂切口疝的患者,可采用腹腔镜与开放杂交技术。需要进一步的研究来更好地确定可能受益于这种方法的患者的疝特征。