• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜“腹腔内补片下层修补术”加:一种可行的切口疝修补方法。

Laparosocpic "Intraperitoneal Underlay Mesh"-Plus: A Viable Approach for Incisional-Ventral Hernia Repair.

作者信息

Chelala Elie, Jacob Brian

机构信息

Belgian Section of Abdominal Wall Surgery Chirec/Delta-Hospital, Departement of Digestive & Bariatric Surgery, Brussels, Belgium.

International Hernia Collaboration, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NYC Partner, Laparoscopic Surgical Center of New York, New York, NY, United States.

出版信息

J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Jun 18;4:14459. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14459. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/jaws.2025.14459
PMID:40607178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12213473/
Abstract

The current Intraperitoneal Underlay Mesh (IPUM), previously referred to as IPOM (onlay), initially faced several challenges due to design and methodological shortcomings, particularly with the use of a bridging technique without defect closure. These limitations contributed to elevated recurrence rates, mesh bulging, seroma formation, and suboptimal abdominal wall function. Although complications such as adhesions, bowel erosion, fistula formation, and mesh migration were rare, they were mostly associated with non-composite or poorly designed meshes and inadequate fixation. These concerns led to growing skepticism regarding intraperitoneal mesh placement and a shift in preference toward retrorectus mesh positioning. Since 2007, the evolution of IPUM+ techniques-where the "+" denotes primary defect closure combined with the use of advanced composite meshes, has led to significantly improved outcomes. Long-term studies, meta-analyses, and randomized trials have demonstrated better functional results, reduced complications, and broader acceptance among surgeons and patients. These advancements have positioned IPUM+ as a reliable and effective option, especially when long-term outcomes of alternative techniques such as eTEP, ventral TAPP, or robotic approaches remain under long term follow up evaluation. IPUM+ continues to serve as a valuable technique for small to moderate or recurrent ventral hernias when performed by experienced surgeons. Future directions should aim to define its role in personalized hernia care, integrating hybrid methods and emerging technologies for complex repairs.

摘要

当前的腹膜内补片下层修补术(IPUM),以前称为腹膜前补片修补术(IPOM,补片置于腹壁上),最初由于设计和方法上的缺陷面临一些挑战,特别是在使用桥接技术而未关闭缺损时。这些局限性导致复发率升高、补片膨出、血清肿形成以及腹壁功能欠佳。虽然粘连、肠侵蚀、瘘管形成和补片移位等并发症很少见,但大多与非复合补片或设计不佳的补片以及固定不充分有关。这些问题导致人们对腹膜内补片放置的怀疑日益增加,并且更倾向于采用腹直肌后补片放置。自2007年以来,IPUM+技术的发展——其中“+”表示原发性缺损关闭并结合使用先进的复合补片,已带来显著改善的结果。长期研究、荟萃分析和随机试验表明,其功能效果更好、并发症减少,并且在外科医生和患者中得到更广泛的接受。这些进展使IPUM+成为一种可靠且有效的选择,尤其是当诸如完全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术(eTEP)、经腹腹膜前腹腔镜疝修补术(ventral TAPP)或机器人手术等替代技术的长期结果仍在长期随访评估中时。当由经验丰富的外科医生进行操作时,IPUM+对于中小或复发性腹疝仍然是一种有价值的技术。未来的方向应旨在确定其在个性化疝治疗中的作用,整合混合方法和新兴技术用于复杂修补。

相似文献

1
Laparosocpic "Intraperitoneal Underlay Mesh"-Plus: A Viable Approach for Incisional-Ventral Hernia Repair.腹腔镜“腹腔内补片下层修补术”加:一种可行的切口疝修补方法。
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Jun 18;4:14459. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14459. eCollection 2025.
2
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
3
Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias.切口疝的开放手术方法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):CD006438. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006438.pub2.
4
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:有效性的系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1-203, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9140.
5
Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜技术与开放技术用于腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(1):CD001785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001785.
6
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
7
Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.用于预防切口疝及其他伤口并发症的剖腹手术切口闭合方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 3;11(11):CD005661. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005661.pub2.
8
Does prophylactic mesh placement in elective, midline laparotomy reduce the incidence of incisional hernia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.在择期正中剖腹手术中预防性放置补片是否能降低切口疝的发生率?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2017 Apr;161(4):1149-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.036. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
9
Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair.网片修补与非网片修补用于急诊腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD015160. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015160.pub2.
10
Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair Plus and Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Repair Plus of Umbilical and Paraumbilical Hernia.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术联合与腹腔镜腹腔内置片修补术联合治疗脐疝和脐旁疝的对比研究
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Jun 3;4:14663. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14663. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) versus intraperitoneal onlay Mesh (IPOM) for ventral hernia repair - an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与腹膜内补片植入修补术(IPOM)治疗腹疝的比较——一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析
Hernia. 2025 Feb 15;29(1):93. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03271-5.
2
Minimally invasive intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus (IPOM +) repair versus enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (e-TEP) repair for ventral hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创腹腔内补片植入术联合(IPOM+)修补术与增强视野完全腹膜外(e-TEP)修补术治疗腹疝的系统评价和荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):1251-1260. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11377-7. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
3
Comparison of eTEP and IPOM for ventral hernia surgery in the early postoperative period: a retrospective cohort study of a tertiary university centre.对比 eTEP 和 IPOM 在腹疝手术后早期的效果:一所三级大学中心的回顾性队列研究。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2195-2206. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03125-6. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
4
Hybrid intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for incisional hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.杂交经腹补片修补术治疗切口疝:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2055-2067. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03105-w. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
5
Complications unveiled: A detailed case report on mesh migration post-incisional hernia repair.并发症揭示:一例切口疝修补术后补片移位的详细病例报告。
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2024 Aug;121:109976. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109976. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
6
Long-term mesh-related complications from minimally invasive intraperitoneal onlay mesh for small to medium-sized ventral hernias.微创经腹腔内置补片修补术治疗小至中型腹外疝的长期网片相关并发症。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):2019-2026. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10716-y. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
7
Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) with fascial repair (IPOM-plus) for ventral and incisional hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜腹腔内补片修补术(IPOM)联合筋膜修复术(IPOM-plus)治疗腹疝和切口疝:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Apr;28(2):385-400. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02983-4. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
8
Laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA) technique versus intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM plus) for ventral hernia repair: a comparative analysis.腹腔镜下腹直肌前鞘修补术(LIRA)与腹腔内补片加强(IPOM plus)治疗腹壁疝的比较分析。
Hernia. 2024 Feb;28(1):167-177. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02858-0. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
9
Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing ventral hernia repair using minimally-invasive extended totally extraperitoneal repair versus intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair.系统评价和荟萃分析比较了使用微创扩展完全腹膜外修复与腹腔内上置网片修复治疗腹疝的效果。
Pol Przegl Chir. 2023 Feb 17;95(4):1-5. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0016.2728.
10
Patient-reported outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic primary ventral and incisional hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与机器人原发性腹侧和切口疝修补术的患者报告结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2023 Apr;27(2):245-257. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02733-4. Epub 2023 Jan 6.