Wilkinson D Allan, Kolar Matthew D
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Brachytherapy. 2013 Jul-Aug;12(4):382-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2013.03.002. Epub 2013 May 7.
To apply failure modes and effects analysis to high-dose-rate treatment planning to identify the most likely and significant sources of error in the process.
We have made a list of 25 failure modes grouped into six categories (imaging, catheter reconstruction, dwell position activity, dose points/normalization, optimization/dose, and evaluation). Each mode was rated on a one to five scale for severity, likelihood of occurrence, and probability of escaping detection. An overall ranking was formed from the product of the three scores. The authors assigned scores independently and the resulting rankings were averaged. We also analyzed 44 reported medical events related to high-dose-rate treatment planning listed on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Web site and compared them with our own rankings.
Failure modes associated with image sets, catheter reconstruction, indexer length, and incorrect dose points had the highest ranking in our analysis (scores higher than 20). The most often cited failure modes in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission reports examined were indexer length (20/44) and incorrect dose points (6/44). Several of our high-ranking modes are not associated with reported events.
It is a useful exercise to identify failure modes locally and analyze the efficacy of the local quality assurance program. Comparison with nationally reported failures can help direct the local analysis, but the absence or small number of reports for failure modes with a high score may be owing to low detectability. Such modes obviously cannot be ignored.
将失效模式与效应分析应用于高剂量率治疗计划,以识别该过程中最可能且显著的误差来源。
我们列出了25种失效模式,分为六类(成像、导管重建、驻留位置活动、剂量点/归一化、优化/剂量和评估)。每种模式在严重程度、发生可能性和未被检测到的概率方面按1至5级进行评分。通过这三个分数的乘积得出总体排名。作者独立打分,然后将得到的排名进行平均。我们还分析了核管理委员会网站上列出的44起与高剂量率治疗计划相关的已报告医疗事件,并将它们与我们自己的排名进行比较。
在我们的分析中,与图像集、导管重建、分度器长度和不正确的剂量点相关的失效模式排名最高(分数高于20)。在所审查的核管理委员会报告中最常被提及的失效模式是分度器长度(20/44)和不正确的剂量点(6/44)。我们的几个高排名模式与已报告事件无关。
识别本地的失效模式并分析本地质量保证计划的有效性是一项有益的工作。与全国范围内报告的故障进行比较有助于指导本地分析,但高分失效模式报告的缺失或数量较少可能是由于检测能力低。此类模式显然不能被忽视。